Bibliometric Analysis of Shared Decision-Making in Healthcare Provision with Integration of Islamic Perspectives
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31436/ijcs.v8i3.504Keywords:
Patient-centered care, Qualitative research, Primary care, Health literacyAbstract
Background: Shared decision-making is a collaborative approach that empowers patients and healthcare providers to make informed decisions, incorporating evidence-based practice and patient input. From an Islamic perspective, the principles of shura, amanah, and maqasid shariah align strongly with the ethical principles of shared decision-making, offering an enriched lens for understanding the moral significance of healthcare.
Methods: This research employed bibliometric analysis to investigate the global research landscape of shared decision-making in healthcare provision and to assess the integration of Islamic perspectives within existing literature. Using Vosviewer, the Bibliometrix R package, and Microsoft Excel, the relevant analysis was done, and visualisations of the data were generated.
Results: The analysis revealed a strong concentration of shared decision-making in healthcare in developed countries, with prominent contributions from authors like Joseph-Williams and Legare. However, there was a limited representation of research from middle- and low-income countries and from Muslim- majority context. The collaboration networks showed gaps in inclusivity and geographical diversity. Journals such as BMJ Open, Health Expectations, and Patient Education and Counseling were identified as leading platforms for shared decision-making publications, reflecting the multidisciplinary nature of the field, which spans areas such as chronic disease management, public health, and patient education. The research provides a comprehensive overview of the shared decision-making research landscape, identifying the strengths, key contributors, and underrepresented areas. Despite the potential benefits of integrating Islamic perspectives into a shared decision-making framework, there is a lack of representation in the current literature.
Conclusion: Strengthening international collaboration and integrating Islamic ethical principles and may enhance the inclusivity and effectiveness of shared decision-making in global healthcare provision.
References
Stacey D, Lewis KB, Smith M, Carley M, Volk R, Douglas EE, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2024 Jan 29;2024(1).
Stiggelbout A, van der weijden T, Wit M, Frosch D, Légaré F, Montori V, et al. Shared decision making: Really putting patients at the centre of healthcare. BMJ. 2012 Jan 27;344:e256.
Montori V, Ruissen M, Hargraves I, Brito J, Kunneman M. Shared decision-making as a method of care. BMJ Evid Based Med. 2022 Dec 2;28:bmjebm-2022.
Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. .
Rahman M, Haque M, Osmani N, Ali I, Sarker MA. Application of Decision Making from Islamic Perspective by Decision Maker. Al Tijarah. 2021 Dec 27;7:42.
Páez G, Forte DN, Gabeiras MDPL. Exploring the Relationship between Shared Decision-Making, Patient-Centered Medicine, and Evidence-Based Medicine. Linacre Quarterly [Internet]. 2021 Aug 1;88(3):272–80. Available from: https://portalcientifico.unav.edu/documentos/63950b2337f90f20be7b8f7d
Marzband R, Zakavi A. A Concept Analysis of Self-Care Based on Islamic Sources. Int J Nurs Knowl. 2015 Dec 1;28.
Padela AI. The essential dimensions of health according to the Maqasid Al-Shari?ah frameworks of Abu Ishaq Al-Shatibi and Jamal-al-Din-?Atiyah.
Abdulahi Hashi A. Clinical Applications of Maqasid al-Shari’ah in Healthcare Services. Malaysian Journal of Medicine and Health Sciences. 2022 Dec 12;18(s19):198–204.
Ward J, Kalsi D, Barnett N, Fulford B, Handa A. Shared decision making in chronic medication use: Scenarios depicting exemplary care. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy. 2019 Apr 1;16.
Liu YQ, Guo YL, Xu J, Geng WJ, Li ZZ, Jia M, et al. Shared Decision-Making in Hemophilic Arthropathy Rehabilitation: A Qualitative Study. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2023;17:249–57.
Truglio-Londrigan M, Slyer JT. Shared Decision-Making for Nursing Practice: An Integrative Review. Open Nurs J [Internet]. 2018 Jan 1 [cited 2025 Nov 23];12(1):1–14. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/org/science/article/pii/S1874434618000387
Jiang Yuyu, Guo Jianlan, Sun Pingping, Chen Zhongyi, Liu Fenglan, Wang Shanshan, et al. Perceptions and experiences of older patients and healthcare professionals regarding shared decision-making in pulmonary rehabilitation: A qualitative study. Clin Rehabil [Internet]. 2021 May 12;35(11):1627–39. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155211010279
Lee PY, Cheong AT, Sazlina SG, Abdul Rashid A, Ong S, Ong S, et al. Barriers of and strategies for shared decision?making implementation in the care of metastatic breast cancer: A qualitative study among patients and healthcare professionals in an Asian country. Health Expectations. 2022 Sep 13;25.
Shamsuddin N, Lee SP, Atan A. An Overview of Children’s Participation in Shared Decision-making in Healthcare Settings. Malaysian Journal of Medicine and Health Sciences. 2023 Sep 11;19:306–16.
Baas J, Schotten M, Plume A, Côté G, Karimi R. Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies. Quantitative Science Studies. 2020 Jan 23;1:1–10.
Aria M. bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. J Informetr. 2017 Nov 1;11:959–975.
Donthu N, Kumar S, Mukherjee D, Pandey N, Lim WM. How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. J Bus Res. 2021 Apr 29;133.
Légaré F, Witteman HO. Shared decision making: examining key elements and barriers to adoption into routine clinical practice. Health Aff [Internet]. 2013;32 2:276–84. Available from: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:39779598
Frosch DL, Moulton BW, Wexler RM, Holmes-Rovner M, Volk RJ, Levin CA. Shared decision making in the United States: policy and implementation activity on multiple fronts. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes [Internet]. 2011 Jan 1 [cited 2025 Nov 23];105(4):305–12. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1865921711001139
Chen W, Zhang H, Xu M, Huang R. Differences in shared decision-making: the East-West divide. BMJ Evid Based Med [Internet]. 2024 Oct 1;29(5):289. Available from: http://ebm.bmj.com/content/29/5/289.abstract
Ismail MA, Midin M. Shared Decision-Making and Role Preference Among Patients With Schizophrenia in Malaysia: A Cross-Sectional Study. Front Psychiatry. 2021 Jul 26;12.
Derrington S, Paquette E, Johnson K. Cross-cultural Interactions and Shared Decision-making. Pediatrics. 2018 Nov 1;142:S187–92.
Walsh K, Aboshady O. Education in shared decision making. MedEdPublish. 2016 Sep 16;5.
Murgic L, Hébert PC, Sovic S, Pavlekovic G. Paternalism and autonomy: views of patients and providers in a transitional (post-communist) country. BMC Med Ethics [Internet]. 2015;16(1):65. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-015-0059-z
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARE SCHOLARS (ISSN: 2600-898X)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
