Qualitative Research Approach for The Conceptual Understanding of Spirituality for Healthcare Service Users: A Methodological Guide

Authors

  • Nurasikin Mohamad Shariff Kulliyyah of nursing

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31436/ijcs.v3i1.131

Keywords:

Conceptual, Grounded Theory, Qualitative, Spiritual

Abstract

This is a methodological paper which addresses the need to conceptualize the characteristics of spirituality from the perspective of healthcare service users by using qualitative approach. The need to provide a conception of spirituality as derived from empirical data lead to the justification of choice for the constructivist grounded theory over other qualitative methodologies. This paper highlights the subjective nature of spirituality that suits with the symbolic interactionist and interpretivist as philosophical paradigm underpin such approach in qualitative inquiry. The implication of applying qualitative approach and constructivist grounded theory is that the empirical work may portray the contextual nature of spirituality for the population of interest, especially when it is arguable non-applicable to global context.

 

References

Lepherd L. Spirituality: Everyone has it, but what is it? Int J Nurs Pract. 2015;21(5):566–574.

McSherry W, Cash K. The language of spirituality: An emerging taxonomy. Int J Nurs Stud. 2004;41(2):151–161.

Hill PC, Pargament KI. Advances in the conceptualization and measurement of religion and spirituality: Implications for physical and mental health research. Psycholog Relig Spiritual. 2008;S(1):3–17.

Nelson JM. Psychology, religion and spirituality. USA: Springer; 2009.

Pesut B, Fowler M, Taylor EJ, Reimer-Kirkham S, Sawatzky R. Conceptualising spirituality and religion for healthcare. J Clin Nurs. 2008 Nov [cited 2014 Aug 7];17(21):2803–2810.

Mcsherry W. The principal components model: a model for advancing spirituality and spiritual care within nursing and health care practice. J Clin Nurs. 2006;15(7):905–917.

Klingemann H, Schï K, Steiner M. What Do You Mean by Spirituality?? Please Draw Me a Picture?! Subst Use Misuse. 2013 [cited 2017 Jun 30];48:1187–1202.

Koenig HG, Dein S, Cook CCH, Powell AE, Eagger S, Koenig HG. Research on religion, spirituality, and mental health: A review. Can J Psychiatry. 2009;54(5):283–291.

Cour P La, Hvidt NC. Research on meaning-making and health in secular society: secular, spiritual and religious existential orientations. Soc Sci Med. 2010;71(7):1292–1299.

Dein S, Cook CCH, Koenig HG. Religion, spirituality, and mental health: Current controversies and future directions. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2012;200(10):852–855.

Reinert KG, Koenig HG. Re-examining definitions of spirituality in nursing research. J Adv Nurs. 2013;69(12):2622–2634.

Weber SR, Pargament KI. The role of religion and spirituality in mental health. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2014;27(5):358–363.

Koenig HG. Concerns about measuring “spirituality” in research. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2008;196(5):349–355.

Park CL. Religiousness/spirituality and health: a meaning systems perspective. J Behav Med. 2007 Aug [cited 2014 May 14];30(4):319–328.

Yousuf RM, Fauzi ARM, Akter SFU, Azarisman SMS, Marzuki OA. Religious and Spiritual Beliefs and Practices in Medicine: An Evaluation in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Malaysia. Ibrahim Med Coll J. 2010;4(1):4–8.

Tabei SZ, Zarei N, Joulaei H. The impact of spirituality on health: a review of literature. Vol. 17, Shiraz E Medical Journal. 2016 [cited 2017 May 5].

Swinton J. Spirituality and mental health care: rediscovering a “forgotten” dimension. London, GBR: Jessica Kingsley Publishers; 2001.

Ahmad M, Khan S. A Model of Spirituality for Ageing Muslims. J Relig Health. 2015;55(3):830–843.

Ho DYF, Ho RTH. Measuring spirituality and spiritual emptiness: Toward ecumenicity and transcultural applicability. Rev Gen Psychol. 2007;11(1):62–74.

Ammerman NT. Spiritual But Not Religious? Beyond Binary Choices in the Study of Religion. J Sci Study Relig. 2013;52(2):258–278.

Fallot RD. Spirituality and religion in recovery: Some current issues. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2007;30(4):261–270.

Swinton J. The meanings of spirituality: a multi-perspective approach to ‘the spiritual.’ In: McSherry W, Ross L, editors. Spiritual Assessment in Healthcare Practice. 1st ed. London: M&K Publishing; 2010. p. 17–35.

Pesut B. A Philosophic Analysis of the Spiritual in Nursing Literature. The University of British Columbia; 2005.

Creswell JW. Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed method approaches. 4th ed. USA: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2014.

Goulding C. Grounded theory?: the missing methodology on the interpretivist agenda. Qual Mark Res An Int J. 1998;1(1):50–57.

Annells M. Grounded Theory Method: Philosophical Perspectives, Paradigm of Inquiry, and Postmodernism. Qual Health Res. 1996;6(3):379–393.

Ritchie J, Lewis J, Nicholls CM, Ormston R. Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. Los Angeles: Sage Publication; 2013.

Carter SM, Little M. Justifying Knowledge, Justifying Method, Taking Action: Epistemologies, Methodologies, and Methods in Qualitative Research. Qual Health Res. 2007;17(10):1316–1328.

Carter MJ, Fuller C. Sympolic interactionism. Sociopedia.isa. 2015;(1):1–17.

Blumer H. Symbolic interactionism: perspective and method. London: University of California Press; 1969.

Aldiabat KM. Philosophical roots of 1. classical grounded theory: Its foundations in symbolic interactionism. Qual Rep. 2011;16(4):1063–1080.

O’Byrne. Introducing sociological theory. England: Pearson education limited; 2011.

Crotty M. The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. Sage; 1998.

Moran D. Introduction to phenomenology. London: Routledge; 2000.

Starks H, Trinidad SB. Choose your method: a comparison of phenomenology, discourse analysis, and grounded theory. Qual Health Re]. 2007 Dec;17(10):1372–1380.

Reissman CK. Narrative analysis. U.S.A: Sage Publications; 1993.

Clandinin DJ, Connelly FM. narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers; 2000.

Thomas G, James D. Reinventing grounded theory: Some questions about theory, ground and discovery. Br Educ Res J. 2006;32(6):767–795.

Lomborg K, Kirkevold M. Truth and validity in grounded theory – a reconsidered realist interpretation of the criteria: fit, work, relevance and modifiability. Nurs Philos . 2003;4(3):189–200.

Artinian B, Giske T, Cone P. Glaserian grounded theory in nursing research: Trusting emergence. New York: Springer Publishing Company; 2009.

Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. U.S.A: AldineTransaction; 1967.

Glaser BG. Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. U.S.A: The sociology press; 1978.

Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative; Grounded theory procedure and techniques. London: Sage; 1990.

Heath H, Cowley S. Developing a grounded theory approach: A comparison of Glaser and Strauss. Int J Nurs Stud. 2004;41(2):141–150.

Mills J, Bonner A, Francis K. The development of constructivist grounded theory. Int J Qual methods. 2008;5(1):25–35.

Glaser BG. Emergence vs forcing basics of grounded theory. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press; 1992.

Breckenridge J, Jones D, Elliott I, Nicol M. Choosing a Methodological Path: Reflections on the Constructivist Turn. Grounded Theory Rev. 2012;11(1).

Nagel DA, Burns VF, Tilley C, Aubin D. When Novice Researchers Adopt Constructivist Grounded Theory: Navigating Less Travelled Paradigmatic and Methodological Paths in PhD Dissertation Work. Int J Dr Stud. 2015;10:365-383.

Charmaz K. “Discovering” chronic illness: using grounded theory. Soc Sci Med . 1990 Jan;30(11):1161–1172.

Simmons OE. Why Classic Grounded Theory. Grounded theory: the philosophy, method, and work of Barney Glaser. 2011;15–30.

Glaser BG. Conceptualization?: On Theory and Theorizing Using Grounded Theory. Int J Qual Methods. 2002;1(2):23–38.

Charmaz K. The search for meanings - Grounded theory. In: Rethinking methods in psychology. London: SAGE Publications; 1996. p. 27–49.

Charmaz K. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. 2006.

Engward H. Understanding Grounded Theory. Nurs Stand. 2013;28(7):37–41.

MacDonald DA, Friedman HL, Brewczynski J, Holland D, Salagame KKK, Mohan KK, et al. Spirituality as a Scientific Construct: Testing Its Universality across Cultures and Languages. 2015 Mar 3;10(3):e0117701.

Downloads

Published

2020-01-31

How to Cite

Shariff, N. M. (2020). Qualitative Research Approach for The Conceptual Understanding of Spirituality for Healthcare Service Users: A Methodological Guide . INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARE SCHOLARS, 3(1), 17–22. https://doi.org/10.31436/ijcs.v3i1.131

Issue

Section

Articles