Healthcare Professionals’ Perspectives on The Provision of Sexual and Reproductive Health to Young People in Malaysia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31436/ijcs.v3i1.111Keywords:
healthcare professionals, experiences, perspectives, sexual health services provision, young people, MalaysiaAbstract
Objective: In Malaysia, sexual health issues among young people encompassing premarital sex, the incidence of STI including HIV/AIDS, unintended pregnancy, unsafe abortion and the practice of baby abandonment. Little is known about the provision of sexual health care for young people since it has not been examined in-depth in a Malaysian context. This study aimed to explore the perspectives of healthcare professionals who deliver sexual health services provision to young people within primary healthcare settings which included schools as part of an outreach programme. Methods: This qualitative study used a self-developed topic guide for in-depth interview with twenty-four healthcare professionals of several government health clinics in Malaysia. The aim was to understand healthcare professionals’ experiences of dealing with young people and their views on current sexual health services provision. The interview data were entered into Nvivo and analysed using thematic analysis. Results: The findings show that healthcare professionals regarded the use of the Adolescent Health Screening Form as a cornerstone for all initial interactions between and young people in health clinics. The findings also highlight the problem with an appointment system that includes lack of consultation times, privacy issues and the requirement of parental consent when dealing with unmarried young people. Conclusion: This study had recognized several facility-based obstacles that restricted sexual health services to young people in Malaysia. Their access to and the utilization of sexual health services are dependent on health care system improvement.
References
2. Ministry of Health. Health of Adolescents in Malaysia. World Heal Organ [Internet]. 2012;1–8. Available from: http://www.wpro.who.int/topics/adolescent_health/malaysia_fs.pdf
3. Tong WT, Low WY, Wong YL, Choong SP, Jegasothy R. A Qualitative Exploration of Contraceptive Practice and Decision Making of Malaysian Women Who Had Induced Abortion: A Case Study. Asia Pac J Public Health [Internet]. 2013;1010539513514434-. Available from: http://aph.sagepub.com/cgi/content/long/1010539513514434v1
4. Mutalip SSM, Mohamed R. Sexual education in Malaysia: Accepted or rejected? Iran J Public Health. 2012;41(7):34–9.
5. Sally Griffin. Universal access to sexual and reproductive health services. 2006.
6. Ministry of Health Malaysia. Malaysia’s Health. Malaysia’s Heal. 2008;89–96.
7. Mustafa K, Ibrahim N. Sociodemographic Profile, Contraceptive Practice and Awareness of HIV Infection among Unmarried Postpartum Women in a Tertiary Centre in Malaysia. J Malaysia [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2015 Jun 10]; Available from: http://journals.iium.edu.my/imjm/index.php/eimj/article/view/197
8. Fossey E, Harvey C, McDermott F, Davidson L. Understanding and evaluating qualitative research. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2002;36(6):717–32.
9. Charmaz K. Constructing Grounded Theory Second Edition [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2015 May 26]. 416 p. Available from: http://www.sagepub.com/books/Book235960?subject=L00&productType=Books&sortBy=defaultPubDate desc&fs=1
10. Garton S, Copland F. ‘I like this interview; I get cakes and cats!’: the effect of prior relationships on interview talk. Qual Res [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2015 Jun 8]; Available from: http://qrj.sagepub.com/content/10/5/533.short
11. Snape D, Spencer L. The Foundations of Qualitative Research. Qual Res Pract A Guid Soc Sci students Res. 2003;2–10.
12. Tracy SJ. Qualitative quality: Eight ‘big-tent’ criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qual Inq. 2010;16(10):837–51.
13. Edwards R, Holland Janet, Esin C, Hyden L-C, Hyden M, Squire C, et al. What is qualitative interviewing? [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2016 Nov 18]. Available from: http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/3276/1/complete_proofs.pdf
14. Judith Green & Nicki Thorogood. Qualitative Methods for Health Research. First Edit. Silverman D, editor. SAGE. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: SAGE Publications; 2004. 1-279 p.
15. Kvale S. Doing Interviews [Internet]. Methods. 2007 [cited 2015 May 27]. 160 p. Available from: http://srmo.sagepub.com/view/doing-interviews/SAGE.xml
16. Karnieli-Miller O, Strier R, Pessach L. Power relations in qualitative research. Qual Heal Res [Internet]. 2009;19(2):279–89. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19150890
17. Donovan P. School-based sexuality education: the issues and challenges. Fam Plann Perspect [Internet]. 1998;30(4):188–93. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9711458%5Cnhttps://www.guttmacher.org/sites/default/files/article_files/3018898.pdf
18. MOH Malaysia. National Adolescent Health Plan of Action. 2015;73.
19. Brittain AW, Williams JR, Zapata LB, Pazol K, Romero LM, Weik TS. Youth-Friendly Family Planning Services for Young People: A Systematic Review. Am J Prev Med [Internet]. Elsevier; 2015;49(2):S73–84. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2015.03.019
20. Hadley A. Teenage pregnancy: huge progress ... but more to do. Community Pract. 2014;87(6):44–7.
21. Brewin D, Koren a., Morgan B, Shipley S, Hardy RL. Behind Closed Doors: School Nurses and Sexual Education. J Sch Nurs [Internet]. 2013;30(1):31–41. Available from: http://jsn.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.1177/1059840513484363
22. Chao R, Tseng V. Parenting of Asian. Handbook of parenting: Social conditions and applied parenting. Series Edi. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2002. p. 59–93.
23. Jacobson L, Richardson G, Parry-Langdon N, Donovan C. How do teenagers and primary healthcare providers view each other? An overview of key themes. Br J Gen Pract. 2001;51(471):811–6.
24. Lamb S, Peterson ZD. Adolescent Girls’ Sexual Empowerment: Two Feminists Explore the Concept. Sex Roles. 2012;66(11–12):703–12.
25. Aksu H, Kucuk M, Karaoz B, Oǧurlu N. Knowledge and attitudes of health care providers working in primary health care units concerning emergency contraception. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2010;70(3):179–85.
26. Sevil U, Yanikkerem E, Hatipoglu S. A survey of knowledge, attitudes and practices relating to emergency contraception among health workers in Manisa, Turkey. Midwifery. 2006;22(1):66–77.
27. Farrag, Hayter. A Qualitative Study of Egyptian School Nurses’ Attitudes and Experiences Toward Sex and Relationship Education. J Sch Nurs. 2014;30(1):49–56.
28. Godia PM, Olenja JM, Lavussa J a, Quinney D, Hofman JJ, van den Broek N. Sexual reproductive health service provision to young people in Kenya; health service providers’ experiences. BMC Health Serv Res [Internet]. 2013;13:476. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24229365
29. Mohammad-Alizadeh C. S, Wahlström R, Vahidi R, Nikniaz A, Marions L, Johansson A. Barriers to high-quality primary reproductive health services in an urban area of Iran: views of public health providers. Midwifery. 2009;25(6):721–30.
