Optimized Type-2 Fuzzy Logic Control for Low-Speed Vehicle Pedal Pressing Automation Using Hybrid Spiral Sine Cosine Algorithm

Azrul Azim Abdullah Hashim; Nor Maniha Abdul Ghani; Salmiah Ahmad; Mohd Ruzaini Hashim; Noor Zirwatul Ahlam Naharuddin; Addie Irawan

doi:10.31436/iiumej.v26i1.3436

Authors

Azrul Azim Abdullah Hashim Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah
Nor Maniha Abdul Ghani Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5568-4663
Salmiah Ahmad University of Doha for Science and Technology https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3345-1812
Mohd Ruzaini Hashim Technical University of Malaysia Malacca https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8228-3865
Noor Zirwatul Ahlam Naharuddin Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9751-6879
Addie Irawan Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5844-8666

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31436/iiumej.v26i1.3436

Keywords:

Fuzzy Logic Controller Type 2, Hybrid Spiral Sine Cosine, Automate Pedal Pressing, Vehicle Speed Control

Abstract

This paper describes the systematic design and experimental analysis of a Fuzzy Logic Controller (FLC) to govern vehicle speed for low-speed driving by adjusting an attached linear actuator that governs the vehicle's pedal. The research investigates two FLC approaches: the standard Type 1 FLC and the advanced Type 2 FLC, both optimized using the Hybrid Spiral Sine Cosine Algorithm (SSCA). The integrated system linking the actuator to the dynamics model of the vehicle shows improved ability in the manner in which control is done. Physical modeling and simulation were done in Simscape MATLAB, which provides an opportunity for modeling and visual description of the actuator system's relationship with the dynamics of the car. The results presented in this paper prove the fact that the analyzed Type 2 FLC optimized by the SSCA method performs better than the traditional Type 1 FLC in terms of the key metrics, with improvements of 32.4242% in overshoot, 0.364 seconds in settling time, and a reduction of 0.002009 in steady-state error at 2 km/h reference speed. This superior performance highlights the potential of the SSCA-optimized Type 2 FLC to automate pedal pressing for vehicle speed control, effectively replacing repetitive pedal actions and reducing driver fatigue, as this mechanism proves capable of controlling vehicle speed with high precision.

ABSTRAK: Kertas kerja ini menerangkan reka bentuk sistematik dan analisis eksperimen Pengawal Logik Kabur (FLC) untuk mengawal kelajuan kenderaan untuk pemanduan berkelajuan rendah dengan melaraskan penggerak linear yang dipasang yang mengawal pedal kenderaan. Penyelidikan ini menyiasat dua pendekatan FLC: FLC Jenis 1 standard dan FLC Jenis 2 lanjutan, kedua-duanya dioptimumkan menggunakan Algoritma Kosinus Sinus Lingkaran Hibrid (SSCA). Sistem bersepadu yang menghubungkan penggerak kepada model dinamik kenderaan menunjukkan keupayaan yang lebih baik dalam cara kawalan dilakukan. Pemodelan dan simulasi fizikal telah dilakukan dalam Simscape MATLAB di mana ia menyediakan peluang pemodelan dan penerangan visual tentang hubungan sistem penggerak dengan dinamik kereta. Keputusan yang dibentangkan dalam kertas kerja ini membuktikan fakta bahawa FLC Jenis 2 yang dianalisis yang dioptimumkan oleh kaedah SSCA menunjukkan prestasi yang lebih baik daripada FLC Jenis 1 tradisional dari segi metrik utama, dengan peningkatan sebanyak 32.4242% dalam overshoot, 0.364 saat dalam masa penyelesaian, dan pengurangan 0.002009 dalam ralat keadaan mantap pada kelajuan rujukan 2 km/j. Prestasi unggul ini menyerlahkan potensi Type 2 FLC yang dioptimumkan SSCA untuk mengautomasikan penekanan pedal untuk kawalan kelajuan kenderaan, menggantikan tindakan pedal berulang dengan berkesan dan mengurangkan keletihan pemandu, kerana mekanisme ini terbukti mampu mengawal kelajuan kenderaan dengan ketepatan tinggi.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Stanton NA, Dunoyer A, Leatherland A. Detection of new in-path targets by drivers using Stop & Go Adaptive Cruise Control. Appl Ergon 2011;42:592–601. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2010.08.016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2010.08.016

Yu L, Wang R. Researches on Adaptive Cruise Control system: A state of the art review. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering 2022;236:211–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/09544070211019254. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09544070211019254

Sankar V. REVIEW ON ADAPTIVE CRUISE CONTROL IN AUTOMOBILES. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering & Robotics Research 2014;3:404–9.

Tjolleng A, Yang J, Jung K. Analysis of Leg Muscle Activities and Foot Angles while Pressing the Accelerator Pedal by Different Foot Postures. Applied Sciences (Switzerland) 2022;12:13025. https://doi.org/10.3390/app122413025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app122413025

Jammes Y, Weber JP, Behr M. Consequences of Car Driving on Foot and Ankle Mobility and Reflexes. Clin Res Foot Ankle 2017;05. https://doi.org/10.4172/2329-910x.1000233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4172/2329-910X.1000233

Idzham MK, Ahmad S, Abdullah M. Deep learning based prediction model of recurrent pedal pressing for low speed. 8th International Conference on Mechatronics Engineering (ICOM 2022), vol. 2022, 2022, p. 63–7. https://doi.org/10.1049/icp.2022.2266. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1049/icp.2022.2266

Isa HM, Ahmad S, Abdullah M, Rahman A, Ghani N, Noor NMM. Modelling of Pedals Pressing Mechanisms for Low Speed Driving in Road Traffic Delay. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 2022;1244:012010. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/1244/1/012010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1244/1/012010

Godjevac J. Comparison between PID and fuzzy control. Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Département d’Informatique, Laboratoire de Microinformatique, Internal Report 1993;93.

Coleman CP, Godbole D. A comparison of robustness: fuzzy logic, PID, and sliding mode control. Proceedings of 1994 IEEE 3rd International Fuzzy Systems Conference, 1994, p. 1654–9 vol.3. https://doi.org/10.1109/FUZZY.1994.343945. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/FUZZY.1994.343945

Kaur A. Comparison between Conventional PID and Fuzzy Logic Controller for Liquid Flow Control: Performance Evaluation of Fuzzy Logic and PID Controller by Using MATLAB/Simulink. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering (IJITEE) 2012:2278–3075.

George T, Ganesan V. Optimal tuning of PID controller in time delay system: a review on various optimization techniques. Chemical Product and Process Modeling 2022;17:1–28. https://doi.org/doi:10.1515/cppm-2020-2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cppm-2020-2001

Hashim AAA, Ghani NMA, Ahmad S, Nasir ANK. System Identification and Control of Linear Electromechanical Actuator Using PI Controller Based Metaheuristic Approach. Applications of Modelling and Simulation 2024;8:213–24.

Wang H, Xu S, Hu H. PID Controller for PMSM Speed Control Based on Improved Quantum Genetic Algorithm Optimization. IEEE Access 2023;11:61091–102. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3284971. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3284971

Dogruer T, Can MS. Design and robustness analysis of fuzzy PID controller for automatic voltage regulator system using genetic algorithm. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control 2022;44:1862–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/01423312211066758. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/01423312211066758

Ghani NMA, Nasir NM, Hashim AAA. Comparative Analysis of Spiral Dynamic Algorithm and Artificial Bee Colony Optimization for Position Control of Flexible Link Manipulators. Journal Europeen Des Systemes Automatises 2024;57:773–9. https://doi.org/10.18280/jesa.570315. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18280/jesa.570315

Mahmoodabadi MJ, Shahangian MM. A New Multi-objective Artificial Bee Colony Algorithm for Optimal Adaptive Robust Controller Design. IETE J Res 2022;68:1251–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/03772063.2019.1644211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03772063.2019.1644211

Yao LJ, Hashim MR, M. O. Tokhi. Artificial Bee Colony Optimization Algorithm with Flexible Manipulator System. International Journal of Electrical Engineering and Applied Sciences (IJEEAS) 2020;3.

Huang M, Tian M, Liu Y, Zhang Y, Zhou J. Parameter optimization of PID controller for water and fertilizer control system based on partial attraction adaptive firefly algorithm. Sci Rep 2022;12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-16425-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-16425-7

Jamshidpour Ehsan and Parameshachari BD and SE and SC-L and RSH and SMH. Modeling and Optimal Control of Power System Frequency Load Controller by Applying Disturbance in the System by a Modified Version of Firefly Algorithm. In: Razmjooy Navid and Ghadimi N and RV, editor. Metaheuristics and Optimization in Computer and Electrical Engineering: Volume 2: Hybrid and Improved Algorithms, Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2023, p. 199–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42685-8_6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42685-8_6

Dhal KG, Das A, Gálvez J. A Novel Fuzzy Logic-Based Improved Cuckoo Search Algorithm. International Journal of Applied Metaheuristic Computing 2022;13:1–29. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijamc.292516. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/IJAMC.292516

Ou X, Wu M, Pu Y, Tu B, Zhang G, Xu Z. Cuckoo search algorithm with fuzzy logic and Gauss–Cauchy for minimizing localization error of WSN. Appl Soft Comput 2022;125:109211. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2022.109211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2022.109211

Pozna C, Precup R-E, Horváth E, Petriu EM. Hybrid Particle Filter–Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm and Application to Fuzzy Controlled Servo Systems. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 2022;30:4286–97. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2022.3146986. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2022.3146986

Sathish Kumar A, Naveen S, Vijayakumar R, Suresh V, Asary AR, Madhu S, et al. An intelligent fuzzy-particle swarm optimization supervisory-based control of robot manipulator for industrial welding applications. Sci Rep 2023;13:8253. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-35189-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-35189-2

Kasruddin Nasir AN, Ahmad MA, Tokhi MO. Hybrid spiral-bacterial foraging algorithm for a fuzzy control design of a flexible manipulator. Journal of Low Frequency Noise Vibration and Active Control 2022;41:340–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/14613484211035646. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14613484211035646

Nasir ANK, Razak AAA, Ismail MTR, Ahmad MA. A Hybrid Spiral-Genetic Algorithm for Global Optimization. Journal of Telecommunication, Electronic and Computer Engineering (JTEC) 2018;10:93–7.

Ghani NMA, Othman A, Hashim AAA, Nasir ANK. Comparative Analysis of PID and Fuzzy Logic Controllers for Position Control in Double-Link Robotic Manipulators. Journal of Intelligent Systems and Control 2023;2:183–96. https://doi.org/10.56578/jisc020401. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56578/jisc020401

Karim MI, Hashim AAA, Ghani NMA. Control of Double Link Flexible Robotic Manipulator System. Journal Europeen Des Systemes Automatises 2022;55:759–63. https://doi.org/10.18280/jesa.550607. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18280/jesa.550607