Trade-Space Exploration Comparison of Parametric Cost Models for Satellite Anomalies with RMSE and RRMSE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31436/iiumej.v26i3.3794Keywords:
Parametric cost mathematical models, satellite anomalies, trade-space exploration, Exponential, Weibull, PoissonAbstract
Satellites are essential for modern communication, navigation, and Earth observation, but their operation in the harsh space environment makes them vulnerable to anomalies and failures, resulting in significant financial losses. This research investigates the relationship between the design life of satellite subsystems and the cost of anomalies, using data from the Seradata database. Three statistical models, Exponential, Weibull, and Poisson distributions, were applied to cost data for four critical subsystems: antenna, payload, power system, and attitude control. Each model was fitted using one-variable (cost only) and two-variable approaches (design life and cost) to evaluate subsystems' behaviour independently and in combination. The performance of each model was assessed using the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and the Relative RMSE (RRMSE). Among all models, the Exponential distribution consistently produced the best results. For instance, the payload subsystem achieved the lowest RMSE and RRMSE of 115.73 and 41.66% in the two-variable case. Similarly, the attitude control subsystem showed strong performance with an RMSE of 110.57 and RRMSE of 40.59%. In contrast, the Poisson distribution yielded the highest errors across most subsystems, with the antenna subsystem reaching an RMSE of 489.87 and RRMSE of 102.65% in the two-variable fitting. The Weibull model demonstrated mixed performance, performing moderately for the payload subsystem (RMSE 186.21, RRMSE 67.03%), but poorly for the power system and antenna subsystems, particularly when two variables were used.
ABSTRAK: Satelit memainkan peranan penting dalam komunikasi moden, navigasi, dan pemerhatian bumi, namun operasinya dalam persekitaran angkasa lepas yang ekstrem menjadikannya terdedah kepada anomali dan kegagalan, sekali gus membawa kepada kerugian kewangan yang besar. Kajian ini mengkaji hubungan antara jangka hayat reka bentuk subsistem satelit dengan kos anomali menggunakan data daripada pangkalan data Seradata. Tiga model statistik iaitu taburan Eksponen, Weibull, dan Poisson telah digunakan pada data kos bagi empat subsistem kritikal: antena, muatan, sistem kuasa, dan kawalan sikap. Setiap model dipadankan menggunakan pendekatan satu pemboleh ubah (kos sahaja) dan dua pemboleh ubah (jangka hayat reka bentuk dan kos) bagi menilai tingkah laku subsistem secara individu dan gabungan. Prestasi setiap model dinilai menggunakan Ralat Punca Min Kuasa Dua (RMSE) dan Relatif RMSE (RRMSE). Antara semua model, taburan Eksponen secara konsisten memberikan dapatan terbaik. Sebagai contoh, dalam subsistem muatan, ia mencapai nilai RMSE dan RRMSE terendah iaitu 115.73 dan 41.66% masing-masing bagi kes dua pemboleh ubah. Begitu juga, subsistem kawalan sikap menunjukkan prestasi kukuh dengan RMSE 110.57 dan RRMSE 40.59%. Sebaliknya, taburan Poisson menghasilkan ralat tertinggi dalam kebanyakan subsistem, dengan subsistem antena mencatatkan RMSE 489.87 dan RRMSE 102.65% dalam padanan dua pemboleh ubah. Model Weibull pula menunjukkan prestasi bercampur, sederhana dalam subsistem muatan (RMSE 186.21, RRMSE 67.03%) tetapi lemah bagi subsistem sistem kuasa dan antena, khususnya apabila dua pemboleh ubah digunakan.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Kodheli, O., et al. (2021). Satellite communications in the new space era: A survey and future challenges. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 23(1), 70–109. https://doi.org/10.1109/comst.2020.3028247.
Shahrul Ariffin, M. A. Z., Abdul Rahim, N., & Mutholib, A. (2025, August 26–27). Trade-space exploration analysis for a system incorporating parametric cost mathematical models: A case study of satellite anomalies. International Conference on Computer and Communication Engineering (ICCCE), Gombak, Kuala Lumpur.
Gao, Y., Yue, L., & Penghui, S. (2021, August). Research status of typical satellite communication systems. 2022 20th International Conference on Optical Communications and Networks (ICOCN). https://doi.org/10.1109/icocn53177.2021.9563909.
Hofner, K., Vahl, A., & Stoll, E. (2018, January). Cost-efficient satellite constellation design by network reliability analysis. 2022 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ram.2018.8463029.
Sakaguchi, K., & Nagatsuma, T. (2022). Impact of space environment on geostationary meteorological satellite data outage. Space Weather, 20(5). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021sw002965.
Jin, W., Sun, B., Li, Z., Zhang, S., & Chen, Z. (2019). Detecting anomalies of satellite power subsystem via stage-training denoising autoencoders. Sensors, 19(14), 3216. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19143216.
Riveiros, A. P., Xing, Y., Bastianello, N., & Johansson, K. H. (2024, June). Real-time anomaly detection and categorization for satellite reaction wheels. 2022 European Control Conference (ECC), 253–260. https://doi.org/10.23919/ecc64448.2024.10591184.
Shen, R., et al. (2024, August). A dynamic channel emulator for CubeSat system test and integration. Proceedings, 2, 129–130. https://doi.org/10.1109/ccece59415.2024.10667238.
Buzulukova, N., & Tsurutani, B. (2022). Space weather: From solar origins to risks and hazards evolving in time. Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspas.2022.1017103.
Poletto, J. (2022). An alternative to the exponential and Weibull reliability models. IEEE Access, 10, 118759–118778. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3219426.
Mahmoudi, E., & Sepahdar, A. (2012). Exponentiated Weibull-Poisson distribution: Model, properties and applications. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 92, 76–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2013.05.005.
Nawaz, M., Haseeb, M., Qamar, S., Hassan, W., & Shahzad, A. (2024). Gene expression programming-based multivariate model for earth infrastructure: Predicting ultimate bearing capacity of rock socketed shafts in layered soil-rock strata. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-024-02061-9.
Mutholib, A., Abdul Rahim, N., Gunawan, T. S., & Ahmarofi, A. A. (2024, July). Performance comparison of data preprocessing methods for trade-space exploration with AI model: Case study of satellite anomalies detection. IEEE 10th International Conference on Smart Instrumentation, Measurement and Application (ICSIMA), 271–275. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSIMA62563.2024.10675571.
Naimi, S., Ayoubi, S., Demattê, J., Zeraatpisheh, M., Amorim, M., & Mello, F. (2021). Spatial prediction of soil surface properties in an arid region using synthetic soil image and machine learning. Geocarto International, 37, 8230–8253. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2021.1996639.
Rahman, N. S. A., & Abdul Rahim, N. (2022). Analysis of reliability prediction and maintainability activities of an earth station system using parallel configurations. WCSE 2022 Spring Event: 2022 9th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Applications, 1647–1655.
Yang, Y., et al. (2022). Mapping crop leaf area index at the parcel level via inverting a radiative transfer model under spatiotemporal constraints: A case study on sugarcane. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 198, 107003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2022.107003.
Li, Y., et al. (2022). An enhanced spatiotemporal fusion method – Implications for DNN based time-series LAI estimation by using Sentinel-2 and MODIS. Field Crops Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2022.108452.
Muhammad W. A., & Abdul Rahim, N. (2023). Operational cost analysis of an earth station system using parallel configuration. 2023 9th International Conference on Computer and Communication Engineering (ICCCE), 388–393.
Aris, W. M. S. W., Abdul Rahim, N., Mansor, M. M., & Rahman, N. S. A. (2024). Operational cost models for an earth station system using 2-parallel and 4-parallel configurations. IIUM Engineering Journal, 25(2), 232–245.
Abdul Rahim, N., Rahman, N. A., Abdoli, S., Rao, S., & Mokhtar, M. I. (2022). Analysis of failure frequency and failure rate of RF/antenna subsystems for an earth station system. NeuroQuantology, 20(10), 8654–8665.
Mutholib, A., Abdul Rahim, N., Gunawan, T. S., & Kartiwi, M. (2025). Trade-space exploration with data preprocessing and machine learning for satellite anomalies reliability classification. IEEE Access.
Abdul Rahim, N. B. A., & Ferris, T. L. J. (2020). A method to establish a trade-space of system requirements and life cycle cost. IEEE Systems Journal, 14(1), 1257–1264.
Rahman, N. S. A., & Abdul Rahim, N. (2023). Sustainable framework for a geostationary satellite control earth station system using parallel configuration. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 30(3), 1498–1508.
Abdul Rahim, N., & Nordin, N. (2020). Reliability model and proposed maintainability activities of earth station system. International Journal of Electrical, Electronics and Data Communication, 5, 20–24.
Denig, W. F., Redmon, R. J., Rodriguez, J. V., & Allen, J. H. (2014). Book review: Satellite anomalies: Benefits of a centralized anomaly database and methods for securely sharing information among satellite operators. Space Weather, 12(8), 528–529. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014sw001100.
Grile, T. M., & Bettinger, R. A. (2022, November). Statistical reliability estimation for satellites operating from 1991–2020 with payload reliability focus. 2022 6th International Conference on System Reliability and Safety (ICSRS), 378–386. https://doi.org/10.1109/icsrs56243.2022.10067366.
Huguenin, M., et al. (2023, October). Statistical sizing of a satellite power subsystem. Proceedings, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/espc59009.2023.10298153.
Wang, B. (2006). Unbiased estimations for the exponential distribution based on step-stress accelerated life-testing data. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 173(2), 1227–1237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2005.04.066.
Bektashi, X., Rexhepi, S., & Limani–Bektashi, N. (2022). Dispersion of count data: A case study of Poisson distribution and its limitations. Asian Journal of Probability and Statistics, 18–28. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajpas/2022/v19i230464.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 IIUM Press

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.








