A CatBoost-Based Framework for Autism Spectrum Disorder Classification from EEG Signals with Blackman–Harris FIR Filtering

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31436/iiumej.v27i3.4522

Keywords:

Autism Spectrum Disorder, Electroencephalography, Blackman–Harris FIR, SVM-RBF, CatBoost

Abstract

Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder marked by impairments in social interaction, communication, and repetitive behavior; early identification remains difficult given its clinical heterogeneity and the subjectivity of conventional diagnosis. This study proposes an EEG-based ASD classification framework combining Blackman–Harris FIR filtering, feature extraction and selection, and machine learning. EEG data were collected from 16 participants (8 ASD, 8 neurotypical) using a 16-channel system, band-pass filtered at 4–40 Hz, segmented into 4-second epochs with 50% overlap, and represented by 176 temporal and spectral features per epoch (11 per channel), followed by fold-specific Mutual Information feature selection. SVM-RBF, CatBoost, LDA, and Gaussian Naive Bayes were evaluated using nested subject-wise 8-fold cross-validation. Based on 7,145 pooled out-of-fold epoch predictions, CatBoost achieved the highest accuracy (99.58%), followed by LDA (97.47%), SVM-RBF (91.60%), and Gaussian Naive Bayes (57.49%). An exploratory paired t-test on fold-wise accuracy showed a nominally significant CatBoost advantage over SVM-RBF (mean difference 8.00 percentage points, ; Cohen’s ). At the participant level, majority voting correctly classified 16/16 participants with CatBoost and LDA, 15/16 with SVM-RBF, and 9/16 with Gaussian Naive Bayes; the 95% CI for 100% accuracy was 79.41–100.00%. These findings support preliminary within-cohort feasibility but not clinical or screening readiness.

ABSTRAK: Gangguan Spektrum Autisme (ASD) adalah gangguan perkembangan neuro yang dicirikan oleh kekurangan interaksi sosial, komunikasi, dan tingkah laku berulang. Pengesanan awal masih sukar disebabkan kepelbagaian klinikal dan sifat subjektif diagnosis konvensional. Kajian ini mencadangkan rangka kerja pengelasan ASD berasaskan EEG yang menggabungkan penapisan Blackman–Harris FIR, pengekstrakan dan pemilihan ciri, serta pembelajaran mesin. Data EEG diperoleh daripada 16 peserta (8 ASD, 8 neurotipikal) menggunakan sistem 16 saluran, ditapis jalur 4–40 Hz, dibahagikan kepada epok 4 saat dengan pertindihan 50%, dan diwakili oleh 176 ciri temporal dan spektral bagi setiap epok (11 setiap saluran), diikuti pemilihan ciri Informasi Bersama khusus bagi setiap lipatan. SVM-RBF, CatBoost, LDA, dan Gaussian Naive Bayes dinilai menggunakan validasi silang 8-lipatan berasaskan subjek. Berdasarkan 7,145 ramalan epok terkumpul luar lipatan, CatBoost mencapai ketepatan tertinggi (99.58%), diikuti LDA (97.47%), SVM-RBF (91.60%), dan Gaussian Naive Bayes (57.49%). Kajian pada ketepatan setiap lipatan bagi ujian-t berpasangan menunjukkan kelebihan nominal yang signifikan bagi CatBoost berbanding SVM-RBF (perbezaan min 8.00 mata peratus, ; Cohen’s ). Pada peringkat peserta, pengelasan undian majoriti adalah betul iaitu 16/16 peserta menggunakan CatBoost dan LDA, 15/16 menggunakan SVM-RBF, dan 9/16 menggunakan Gaussian Naive Bayes; 95% CI bagi ketepatan 100% ialah 79.41–100.00%. Dapatan ini menyokong kebolehlaksanaan awal kohort ini, tetapi bukan kesediaan klinikal atau saringan.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Rogala J, et al. (2023) Enhancing autism spectrum disorder classification in children through the integration of traditional statistics and classical machine learning techniques in EEG analysis. Sci. Rep., 13:21748. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-49048-7

Romero M, et al. (2016) Psychiatric comorbidities in autism spectrum disorder: A comparative study between DSM-IV-TR and DSM-5 diagnosis. Int. J. Clin. Health Psychol., 16(3):266-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2016.03.001

Wantzen P, et al. (2022) EEG resting-state functional connectivity: evidence for an imbalance of external/internal information integration in autism. J. Neurodev. Disord., 14:47. https://doi.org/10.1186/s11689-022-09456-8

Kang J, Xie H, Mao W, Wu J, Li X, Geng X (2023) EEG connectivity diversity differences between children with autism and typically developing children: A comparative study. Bioengineering, 10(9):1030. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10091030

Dissanayake T, Fernando T, Denman S, Sridharan S, Fookes C (2021) Deep learning for patient-independent epileptic seizure prediction using scalp EEG signals. IEEE Sens. J., 21(7):9377-9388. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2021.3057076

Melinda M, Gazali S, Away Y, Rafiki A, Wong WK, Muliyadi M, Rusdiana S (2026) Heavy–light soft-vote fusion of EEG heatmaps for autism spectrum disorder detection. J. Electron. Electromed. Eng. Med. Inform., 8(1):409-429. https://doi.org/10.35882/jeeemi.v8i1.1377

Muliyadi M, Melinda M, Away Y, Gazali S (2025) Comparative analysis of normal and ASD EEG data using Hjorth parameters. 2025 7th International Congress on Human-Computer Interaction, Optimization and Robotic Applications (ICHORA), pp. 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICHORA65333.2025.11017066

Melinda M, Purnamasari PD, Fahmi F, Sinulingga EP, Muliyadi M, Away Y, Yunidar Y, Juwono FH (2025) A comprehensive EEG dataset and performance assessment for autism spectrum disorder. Sci. Rep., 15:34981. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-18934-7

Ding Y, Robinson N, Zhang S, Zeng Q, Guan C (2023) TSception: Capturing temporal dynamics and spatial asymmetry from EEG for emotion recognition. IEEE Trans. Affect. Comput., 14(3):2238-2250. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAFFC.2022.3169001

Pant A, Kumar A (2024) Hanning FIR window filtering analysis for EEG signals. Biomedical Analysis, 1(2):111-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioana.2024.05.003

Pant A, Kumar A, Verma C, Illés Z (2024) Comparative exploration on EEG signal filtering using window control methods. Results Control Optim., 17:100485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rico.2024.100485

Harris FJ (1978) On the use of windows for harmonic analysis with the discrete Fourier transform. Proc. IEEE, 66(1):51-83. https://doi.org/10.1109/PROC.1978.10837

Muliyadi M, Melinda M, Away Y, Gazali S, Rafiki A, Wong WK (2026) Bayesian-optimized Butterworth-PID preprocessing for EEG-based autism spectrum disorder classification. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2026.3709120

Mastropietro A, Feldmann C, Bajorath J (2023) Calculation of exact Shapley values for explaining support vector machine models using the radial basis function kernel. Sci. Rep., 13:19561. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-46930-2

Geeitha S, Ravishankar K, Cho J, Easwaramoorthy SV (2024) Integrating cat boost algorithm with triangulating feature importance to predict survival outcome in recurrent cervical cancer. Sci. Rep., 14:19828. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-67562-0

Prokhorenkova L, Gusev G, Vorobev A, Dorogush AV, Gulin A (2018) CatBoost: unbiased boosting with categorical features. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 31 (NeurIPS 2018), pp. 6638-6648.

Nassir LM, Ramadhan AJ, Al-Sharify NT, Khalaf MI, Ogaili AAF, Jaber AA, Al-Sharify ZT (2025) Robust multi-state EEG cognitive classification via optimized time-domain features and CatBoost. Int. J. Robot. Control Syst., 5(2):968-989. https://doi.org/10.31763/ijrcs.v5i2.1799

Bhaskar N, Borhade RR, Barekar S, Bachute M, Bairagi V (2024) CNN-CatBoost ensemble deep learning model for enhanced disease detection and classification of kidney disease. Indonesian J. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci., 34(1):144-151. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijeecs.v34.i1.pp144-151

Garthwaite PH, Moustafa MW, Elfadaly FG (2024) Locally correct confidence intervals for a binomial proportion: A new criteria for an interval estimator. Scand. J. Stat., 51(1):220-244. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjos.12672

Chicco D, Sichenze A, Jurman G (2025) A simple guide to the use of Student’s t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, Chi-squared test, and Kruskal-Wallis test in biostatistics. BioData Min., 18:56. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13040-025-00465-6

Nariya MK, Mills CE, Sorger PK, Sokolov A (2023) Paired evaluation of machine-learning models characterizes effects of confounders and outliers. Patterns, 4(8):100791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2023.100791

Jafrasteh B, Adeli E, Pohl KM, Kuceyeski A, Sabuncu MR, Zhao Q (2025) Statistical variability in comparing accuracy of neuroimaging based classification models via cross validation. Sci. Rep., 15:28745. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-12026-2

Steinert S, Ruf V, Dzsotjan D, Großmann N, Schmidt A, Kuhn J, Küchemann S (2024) A refined approach for evaluating small datasets via binary classification using machine learning. PLoS ONE, 19(5):e0301276. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0301276

Downloads

Published

2026-09-11

How to Cite

Waladah, B., Melinda, Yunidar, Rafiki, A., Rusdiana, S., & Wong, W. K. (2026). A CatBoost-Based Framework for Autism Spectrum Disorder Classification from EEG Signals with Blackman–Harris FIR Filtering. IIUM Engineering Journal, 27(3), 230–249. https://doi.org/10.31436/iiumej.v27i3.4522

Issue

Section

Electrical, Computer and Communications Engineering