CFD Analysis of the Effect of a Ball Throttle on the Hydraulic Drive Stability
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31436/iiumej.v27i3.4503Keywords:
hydraulic systems, ball throttle, flow control, CFD (Computational Fluids Dynamics, CAD modellingAbstract
This paper investigates the impact of a ball throttle on the stability of a vehicle's hydraulic drive system. To do so, a simulation model of the hydraulic system was developed in MATLAB/Simulink, and a 3D computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis of the working fluid flow was conducted in SolidWorks Flow Simulation. Additionally, experimental studies were performed on a KI-4815M hydraulic test bench, utilizing SS302 pressure sensors and an Arduino-based data acquisition system. The findings indicate that implementing a ball throttle helps reduce pressure fluctuations and dynamic loads within the hydraulic system. The differences between the CFD results, Simulink simulations, and experimental data do not exceed 5,67% at a load of 700 N. These results confirm the effectiveness of the proposed method for enhancing the stability of hydraulic drives.
ABSTRAK: Kajian ini menyelidiki kesan pendikit bola terhadap kestabilan sistem pemacu hidraulik kenderaan. Bagi mencapai tujuan ini, satu model simulasi sistem hidraulik telah dibangun menggunakan MATLAB/Simulink, manakala analisis dinamik bendalir pengiraan (CFD) 3D bagi aliran bendalir kerja telah dilakukan mengguna pakai simulator SolidWorks Flow. Selain itu, kajian eksperimen telah dilaksanakan pada bangku ujian hidraulik KI-4815M dengan penderia tekanan SS302 serta sistem pemerolehan data berasaskan Arduino. Dapatan kajian menunjukkan bahawa pelaksanaan pendikit bola membantu mengurangkan turun naik tekanan dan beban dinamik dalam sistem hidraulik. Perbezaan antara keputusan CFD, simulasi Simulink, dan data eksperimen tidak melebihi 5.67% pada beban 700 N. Dapatan ini mengesahkan keberkesanan kaedah yang dicadangkan dalam meningkatkan kestabilan pemacu hidraulik.
Downloads
References
Avrunin GA, Gritsai IV, Kirichenko IG, Moroz II, Shcherbak OV (2008) Volumetric hydraulic drive and hydropneumatic automation. KhNADU, Kharkov.
Anderson JD (2017) Computational Fluid Dynamics: The Basics with Applications. McGraw-Hill.
Versteeg H, Malalasekera W (2007) An Introduction to Computational Fluid Dynamics. Pearson.
Domagala M, Fabis-Domagala J (2023) A review of the CFD method in the modeling of flow forces. Energies, 16:6059.
Musa AA, et al. (2021) Advances in CFD-driven design for fluid-particle separation and filtration systems in engineering applications. Iconic Research and Engineering Journals, 5(3):347-365.
Ahmed R, Motin A, Srinivasan C, Zhang Y (2022) CFD analysis of a centrifugal pump controlling a vehicle coolant hydraulic system: A comparison between MRF and transient approaches. SAE Technical Paper.
Tamburrano P, et al. (2019) 2D CFD analysis of servovalve main stage internal leakage. Proceedings of the ASME/BATH 2019 Symposium on Fluid Power and Motion Control, Longboat Key, FL, USA.
Frosina E, Senatore A, Buono D (2015) 3D CFD transient analysis of the forces acting on the spool of a directional valve. Energy Procedia, 81:1090-1101.
Herakovi? N, Duhovnik J, Šimic M (2015) CFD simulation of flow force reduction in hydraulic valves. Tehni?ki Vjesnik, 22(2):453-463.
Wu D, Li S, Wu P (2015) CFD simulation of flow-pressure characteristics of a pressure control valve for automotive fuel supply system. Energy Conversion and Management, 101:658-665.
Yu J, Zhuang J, Yu D (2014) Modeling and analysis of a rotary direct drive servovalve. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 27(5):1064-1074.
Bazsó C, H?s C (2012) A CFD study on the stability of a hydraulic pressure relief valve. Conference on Modeling Fluid Flow (CMFF’12), Budapest, Hungary.
Wang JX, Li FX (2020) Flow analysis and structural optimization of a ball valve focusing on the effects of opening degree. Academic Journal of Manufacturing Engineering, 18(2):76-86.
White FM (2016) Fluid Mechanics. McGraw-Hill.
Çengel Y, Cimbala J (2020) Fluid Mechanics: Fundamentals and Applications. McGraw-Hill.
Menter F (1994) Two-equation turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA Journal, 32(8):1598-1605.
Avtushko VP, et al. (2015) Theory and design of hydraulic-pneumatic drives. Part 1. Two-position hydraulic-pneumatic drives with relay control. BNTU, Minsk.
Šulc B, Jan JA (2002) Non linear modelling and control of hydraulic actuators. Acta Polytech., 42(3):41-47.
Jelali M, Kroll A (2012) Hydraulic Servo-Systems: Modelling, Identification and Control. Springer Science & Business Media.
Petrov VV (1951) On self-oscillations of two-cascade servo mechanisms with relay control. Automation and Telemechanics, 12:1-28.
Khokhlov VA, et al. (1971) Electrohydraulic servo systems. Mashinostroenie, Moscow.
Metlyuk NF, Avtushko VP (1980) Dynamics of pneumatic and hydraulic drives of automobiles. Mashinostroenie, Moscow.
SolidWorks Corporation (2022) Flow Simulation Technical Reference. Dassault Systèmes.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 IIUM Press

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.








