Surrogate Model-based Optimization of a Biplane Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Wing Using Genetic Algorithm and Response Surface Methodology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31436/iiumej.v27i1.3980Keywords:
Biplane, UAV, Response Surface Method, Aerodynamic Optimization, Genetic AlgorithmAbstract
Multi-wing aerial vehicle designs have existed since the early days of aviation; however, they are not commonly employed in modern designs, as advances in materials technology have enabled the structurally feasible high-aspect-ratio monoplane configurations. Nevertheless, the application has the potential to serve as a solution in the field of mini unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) design, offering the advantage of a smaller wing span. The most popular multi-wing application, the biplane, features two wings mounted in parallel and is typically characterized by the geometric terms decalage, stagger, and gap, which should be optimized during the design process. This study focuses on aerodynamic optimization of a biplane wing to maximize the lift-to-drag ratio (CL/CD) and the CL3/2/CD by optimizing the aforementioned geometric parameters. To this end, the aerodynamic analysis method was initially validated by comparing it with wind-tunnel data for a monoplane wing reported in the literature. The Response Surface Method (RSM) was used to assess the effects of the design parameters and to generate surrogate models for CL/CD and CL3/2/CD. The optimal design was determined using the genetic algorithm. The results indicated that decalage and gap distance primarily determine range improvement, whereas gap and stagger are the primary parameters for improving endurance. The applied optimization approach resulted in improvements of 10.93% in range and 46.63% in endurance relative to the base biplane configuration.
ABSTRAK: Reka bentuk kenderaan udara berbilang sayap telah wujud sejak awal perkembangan penerbangan; namun, ia jarang digunakan dalam reka bentuk moden berikutan kemajuan teknologi bahan yang membolehkan nisbah-aspek-tinggi konfigurasi monosayap lebih berdaya struktur. Namun, aplikasi berbilang sayap berpotensi menjadi penyelesaian reka bentuk kenderaan udara tanpa pemandu bersaiz kecil (mini UAV), khususnya dengan kelebihan bentangan sayap lebih kecil. Konfigurasi berbilang sayap iaitu paling lazim, sayap berkembar (biplane), merujuk kepada dua sayap yang disusun selari dan dicirikan oleh parameter geometri utama seperti sela, aturan, dan jurang, perlu ditentukan secara optimum dalam proses reka bentuk. Kajian ini memfokuskan kepada pengoptimuman aerodinamik sayap berkembar bagi memaksimumkan nisbah angkat kepada seretan (CL/CD) dan CL3/2/CD melalui pemilihan optimum parameter geometri tersebut. Kaedah analisis aerodinamik terlebih dahulu disahkan melalui perbandingan data terowong angin bagi monosayap yang dilaporkan dalam literatur. Kaedah Permukaan Tindak Balas (Response Surface Method, RSM) digunakan bagi menilai kesan parameter reka bentuk dan model pengganti bagi CL/CD dan CL3/2/CD, manakala reka bentuk optimum ditentukan menggunakan algoritma genetik. Keputusan menunjukkan bahawa sela dan jurang merupakan parameter utama dalam peningkatan jarak terbang, manakala jurang dan aturan lebih dominan dalam meningkatkan daya tahan penerbangan. Pendekatan pengoptimuman yang dicadangkan menghasilkan peningkatan sebanyak 10.93% dari segi jarak dan 46.63% dari segi daya tahan berbanding konfigurasi sayap berkembar asas.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Guo T, Feng L, Zhu C, Zhou X, Chen H. (2022) Conceptual Research on a Mono-Biplane Aerodynamics-Driven Morphing Aircraft. Aerospace, 9(7):380. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace9070380.
Nguyen TD, Kashitani M, Taguchi M, Kusunose K. (2022) Effect of Stagger on Low-Speed Performance of Busemann Biplane Airfoil. Aerospace, 9(4):197. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace9040197.
Guo R, Bai Y, Pei X, Lai Z. (2021) Numerical investigation of aerodynamics and wake on biplane airfoils at high angles of attack. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 205:106606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.106606.
Leifsson L, Koziel S, Tesfahunegn YA. (2016) Multiobjective aerodynamic optimization by variable-fidelity models and response surface surrogates. AIAA Journal, 54(2):531–541. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J054128.
Immonen E. (2017) 2D shape optimization under proximity constraints by CFD and response surface methodology. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 41:508–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2016.09.009.
Tang X, Luo J, Liu F. (2017) Aerodynamic shape optimization of a transonic fan by an adjoint-response surface method. Aerospace Science and Technology, 68:26–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2017.05.005.
Aelaei M, Karimian S, Ommi F. (2019) Sensitivity analysis and optimization of delta wing design parameters using CFD-based response surface method. Journal of Applied Fluid Mechanics, 12(6):1885–1903. https://doi.org/10.29252/jafm.12.06.29706.
Tian-tian Z, Mohamed E, Wei H, Zhen-guo W, Derek BI, Lin M, Mohamed P. (2019) Winglet design for vertical axis wind turbines based on a design of experiment and CFD approach. Energy Conversion and Management, 195:712–726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2019.05.055.
Yao X, Liu W, Han W, Li G, Ma Q. (2020) Development of response surface model of endurance time and structural parameter optimization for a tailsitter UAV. Sensors, 20(6):1766. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20061766.
Hariharan K, Jun SL, Foster KK, Man YH, June KM. (2021) A multi-objective airfoil shape optimization study using mesh morphing and response surface method. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 35:1075–1086. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-021-0221-0.
Win SY, Thianwiboon M. (2021) Parametric optimization of NACA 4412 airfoil in ground effect using full factorial design of experiment. Engineering Journal, 25(12):9–19. https://doi.org/10.4186/ej.2021.25.12.9.
Yildirim BY, Tuncer H. (2021) Wing planform optimization using flow solutions and response surface methodology. AIAA Aviation Forum, p.2564. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2021-2564.
Simmons BM. (2023) Evaluation of response surface experiment designs for distributed propulsion aircraft aero-propulsive modelling. AIAA SciTech Forum, p.2551. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2023-2251.
Dam B, Pirasaci T, Kaya M. (2022) Artificial neural network based wing planform aerodynamic optimization. Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology, 94(10):1731–1747. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEAT-10-2021-0311.
Samputh HH, Moey LK, Tai VC, Tan YC. (2024) Investigation of aerodynamic characteristics of swept C-wing configurations at transonic speed using design of experiments and computational fluid dynamics. Aviation, 28(2):72–84. https://doi.org/10.3846/aviation.2024.21495.
Analysis of foils and wings operating at low Reynolds numbers. (2025) Available at: https://aero.us.es/adesign/Slides/Extra/Aerodynamics/Software/XFLR5/XFLR5%20v6.10.02/Guidelines.pdf (Accessed 19 July 2025).
Bastedo WG, Mueller TJ. (1986) Spanwise variation of laminar separation bubbles on wings at low Reynolds number. Journal of Aircraft, 23(9):687–694. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.45363.
Durakovic B. (2017) Design of experiments application, concepts, examples: State of the art. Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences, 5(3):421-439. https://doi.org/10.21533/pen.v5i3.145.
Myers RH, Montgomery DC. (1996) Response Surface Methodology. Taylor and Francis, USA.
Antony J. (2023) Design of Experiments for Engineers and Scientists. Elsevier, UK.
Alin A. (2010) Minitab. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics, 2(6):723–727. https://doi.org/10.1002/wics.113.
Jones R., Cleaver D.J., Gursul I. (2015) Aerodynamics of biplane and tandem wings at low Reynolds numbers. Exp Fluids, 56: 124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-015-1998-3.
Cai Y., Liu G., Zhu X., Tu Q., Hong G. (2019) Aerodynamic interference significance analysis of two-dimensional front wing and rear wing airfoils with stagger and gap variations. Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 32(6): 04019098. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0001090.
?umnu A, Eraslan Y. (2025) Aerodynamic shape optimization of simplified ground vehicle (Ahmed Body) using passive control devices. Mechanics, 31(1):5–14. https://doi.org/10.5755/j02.mech.36452.
Pogosyan MA. (2025) Aircraft Design. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-4599-2.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 IIUM Press

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.








