Machine Learning and RSM for Strength Forecasting in Sustainable SCGC

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31436/iiumej.v26i3.3730

Keywords:

Response Surface Methodology (RSM), Machine Learning Models, Self-Compacting Geopolymer Concrete (SCGC), Flexural Strength Prediction, Splitting Tensile Strength

Abstract

This research focuses on the predictive modeling of flexural (Ff) and splitting tensile (Ft) strengths in Self-Compacting Geopolymer Concrete (SCGC) to support sustainable mix design optimization. A curated dataset comprising 544 experimental records was utilized to train and evaluate eight supervised machine learning (ML) algorithms. These included Support Vector Machines (SVM), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Random Forests, Gradient Boosting, CN2 Rule Induction, Naïve Bayes, Decision Trees, and Stochastic Gradient Descent. The predictive performance of each model was assessed using multiple statistical metrics, such as RMSE, R², and accuracy percentage. Among the models, SVM and KNN achieved the highest precision, with R² values of 0.99 and RMSE as low as 0.10 MPa. Additionally, statistical techniques were applied to identify influential input variables, confirming the dominant role of binder constituents in determining tensile-related strength. The models demonstrated strong generalization on unseen data and minimal sensitivity to activator dosage or curing age. These results validate the effectiveness of ML-driven tools for SCGC prediction and offer a scalable framework for integrating data analytics into sustainable concrete design and performance optimization.

ABSTRAK: Kajian ini memfokuskan kepada pemodelan ramalan bagi kekuatan lenturan (Ff) dan tegangan belahan (Ft) dalam Konkrit Geopolimer Pemadat Kendiri (SCGC) bagi menyokong pengoptimuman reka bentuk campuran mampan. Satu set data terpilih yang merangkumi 544 rekod eksperimen telah digunakan bagi melatih dan menilai lapan algoritma pembelajaran mesin (ML) terselia. Algoritma tersebut termasuk Mesin Sokongan Vektor (SVM), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Rawak Forests, Gradient Boosting, CN2 Rule Induction, Naïve Bayes, Pokok Keputusan, dan Stochastic Gradient Descent. Prestasi ramalan setiap model dinilai menggunakan pelbagai metrik statistik seperti RMSE, R², dan peratusan ketepatan. Antara model tersebut, SVM dan KNN mencapai ketepatan tertinggi dengan nilai R² sebanyak 0.99 dan RMSE serendah 0.10 MPa. Tambahan, teknik statistik turut digunakan bagi mengenal pasti pemboleh ubah input berpengaruh, sekali gus mengesahkan peranan dominan konstituen pengikat dalam menentukan kekuatan berkaitan tegangan. Model yang dibangunkan menunjukkan keupayaan generalisasi yang kukuh terhadap data baharu serta kepekaan minimum terhadap dos pengaktif atau umur pengerasan. Dapatan ini mengesahkan keberkesanan alat berasaskan ML bagi meramal SCGC dan menawarkan kerangka boleh skala bagi mengintegrasikan analitik data ke dalam reka bentuk konkrit mampan serta pengoptimuman prestasi.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Heshmati, M., Sheikh, M. N., & Hadi, M. N. S. (2025). A comprehensive review of the fresh and hardened characteristics of self-compacting geopolymer concrete. Journal of Sustainable Cement-Based Materials, 14(4), 816–835. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650373.2025.2461182

Gopalakrishna, B., & Pasla, D. (2024). Study of Ambient Cured Fly Ash-GGBS-Metakaolin-Based Geopolymers Mortar. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, 440. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-7464-1_3

Shahrokh, S., Armaghan, S., & Danandeh, A. M. (2025). Service Life Prediction and Life Cycle Assessment of Pozzolanic Concretes. 54(4), 29–36. 10.22034/ceej.2024.61027.2338

Inqiad, W. Bin, Siddique, M. S., Alarifi, S. S., Butt, M. J., Najeh, T., & Gamil, Y. (2023). Comparative analysis of various machine learning algorithms to predict 28-day compressive strength of Self-compacting concrete. Heliyon, 9(11). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22036

Sukontasukkul, P., Intarabut, D., Phoo-ngernkham, T., Suksiripattanapong, C., Zhang, H., & Chindaprasirt, P. (2023). Self-compacting steel fibers reinforced geopolymer: Study on mechanical properties and durability against acid and chloride attacks. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2023.e02298

Sun, C., Wang, K., Liu, Q., Wang, P., & Pan, F. (2023). Machine-Learning-Based Comprehensive Properties Prediction and Mixture Design Optimization of Ultra-High-Performance Concrete. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(21). https://doi.org/10.3390/su152115338

Ahmad, A., Ahmad, W., Chaiyasarn, K., Ostrowski, K. A., Aslam, F., Zajdel, P., & Joyklad, P. (2021). Prediction of geopolymer concrete compressive strength using novel machine learning algorithms. Polymers, 13(19). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13193389

Saha, P., Sapkota, S. C., Das, S., & Kwatra, N. (2024). Prediction of fresh and hardened properties of self-compacting concrete using ensemble soft learning techniques. Multiscale and Multidisciplinary Modeling Experiments and Design, 7(5), 4923–4945. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41939-024-00423-5

de-Prado-Gil, J., Palencia, C., Silva-Monteiro, N., & Martínez-García, R. (2022). To predict the compressive strength of self compacting concrete with recycled aggregates utilizing ensemble machine learning models. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01046

Biswas, R., Kumar, M., Singh, R. K., Alzara, M., El Sayed, S. B. A., Abdelmongy, M., Yosri, A. M., & Yousef, S. E. A. S. (2023). A novel integrated approach of RUNge Kutta optimizer and ANN for estimating compressive strength of self-compacting concrete. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2023.e02163

Dong, B., Zhao, S., Zhang, Y., Zhang, Y., Yu, Y., & Yang, J. (2025). Physics-based probabilistic analysis of corrosion initiation in alkali-activated slag concrete assisted by machine learning. Construction and Building Materials, 471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.140661

Iqbal, M., Nazar, S., Yang, J., & Mahmoud, H. A. (2025). Integrated machine learning and response surface methodology for comprehensive rheological characterization of low-carbon binders. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2025.e04475

Parhi, S. K., Dwibedy, S., & Panigrahi, S. K. (2024). AI-driven critical parameter optimization of sustainable self-compacting geopolymer concrete. Journal of Building Engineering, 86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.108923

Aneja, S., Sharma, A., Gupta, R., & Yoo, D. Y. (2021). Bayesian regularized artificial neural network model to predict strength characteristics of fly-ash and bottom-ash based geopolymer concrete. Materials, 14(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14071729

Jiang, H., Liu, G., Alyami, H., Alharbi, A., Jameel, M., & Khadimallah, M. A. (2022). Intelligence decision mechanism for prediction of compressive strength of self-compaction green concrete via neural network. Journal of Cleaner Production, 340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130580

Mazumder, E. A., & Prasad Meesaraganda, L. V. (2023). Probabilistic Estimation for Mechanical Properties of Self-Compacting Geopolymer Concrete Using Machine Learning Technique. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 48(10). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-023-07866-x

Aliabdo, A. A., Abd Elmoaty, A. E. M., & Salem, H. A. (2016). Effect of water addition, plasticizer and alkaline solution constitution on fly ash based geopolymer concrete performance. Construction and Building Materials, 121, 694–703. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2016.06.062

Phoo-Ngernkham, T., Phiangphimai, C., Damrongwiriyanupap, N., Hanjitsuwan, S., Thumrongvut, J., & Chindaprasirt, P. (2018). A Mix Design Procedure for Alkali-Activated High-Calcium Fly Ash Concrete Cured at Ambient Temperature. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2460403

Arun, B. R., Srishaila, J. M., S, M. K., Algur, V., K, K., & Tanu, H. (2024). Prediction of machine learning application in the development of novel sustainable self-compacting geopolymer concrete. Research on Engineering Structures and Materials, x(xxxx), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.17515/resm2024.354ma0716rs

Lavanya, G., & Jegan, J. (2015). Durability Study on High Calcium Fly Ash Based Geopolymer Concrete. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/731056

Deilami, S., Aslani, F., & Elchalakani, M. (2019). An experimental study on the durability and strength of SCC incorporating FA, GGBS and MS. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Structures and Buildings, 172(5). https://doi.org/10.1680/jstbu.17.00129

Rangan, B., & Hardjito, D. (2005). Studies on fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. Proc. 4th World …, November.

Nishanth, L., & Patil, D. N. N. (2022). Experimental evaluation on workability and strength characteristics of self-consolidating geopolymer concrete based on GGBFS, flyash and alccofine. Materials Today: Proceedings, 59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.10.200

Vijaya Prasad, B., Paul Daniel, A. P., Anand, N., & Yadav, S. K. (2022). Strength and microstructure behaviour of high calcium fly ash based sustainable geo polymer concrete. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.1108/JEDT-03-2021-0178

Alam, M. F., Shubham, K., Kumar, S., & Srivastava, A. K. L. (2024). Enhancing high-strength self-compacting concrete properties through Nano-silica: analysis and prediction of mechanical strengths. Journal of Building Pathology and Rehabilitation, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41024-024-00386-7

Tho-In, T., Sata, V., Chindaprasirt, P., & Jaturapitakkul, C. (2012). Pervious high-calcium fly ash geopolymer concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.12.028

Bheel, N., Awoyera, P., Tafsirojjaman, T., Hamah Sor, N., & sohu, S. (2021). Synergic effect of metakaolin and groundnut shell ash on the behavior of fly ash-based self-compacting geopolymer concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125327

Pirhadi, N., Tang, X., Yang, Q., & Kang, F. (2019). A new equation to evaluate liquefaction triggering using the response surface method and parametric sensitivity analysis. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11010112

Fontanari, T., Fróes, T. C., & Recamonde-Mendoza, M. (2022). Cross-validation Strategies for Balanced and Imbalanced Datasets. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 13653 LNAI. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21686-2_43

Li, Z., Pei, T., Ying, W., Srubar III, W. V., Zhang, R., Yoon, J., Ye, H., Dabo, I., & Radli?ska, A. (2024). Simulation-Based Transfer Learning for Concrete Strength Prediction. In Rilem Bookseries (Vol. 48). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-53389-1_98

Shaikhina, T., & Khovanova, N. A. (2017). Handling limited datasets with neural networks in medical applications: A small-data approach. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 75, 51–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2016.12.003

Arthi, K., Sankaradass, V., Parveen, N., & Muralidharan, J. (2023). Methods of cross-validation and bootstrapping. In Toward Artificial General Intelligence: Deep Learning, Neural Networks, Generative AI. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111323749-007

Hong, J.-S., Lee, J., & Sim, M. K. (2024). Concise rule induction algorithm based on one-sided maximum decision tree approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121365

Wickramasinghe, I., & Kalutarage, H. (2021). Naive Bayes: applications, variations and vulnerabilities: a review of literature with code snippets for implementation. Soft Computing, 25(3), 2277–2293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-05297-6

Jin, Z., Hei, T. G., & Jin, K. (2024). Application of support vector machines for categorizing biological and medical data. Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering, 13105. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3026871

Saha, A., Yadav, R. K., & Dwivedi, R. K. (2024). Efficient Convergence Analysis of Stochastic Gradient Descent for Large-Scale Optimization. 2024 International Conference on Optimization Computing and Wireless Communication, ICOCWC 2024. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICOCWC60930.2024.10470675

Liang, C., Xia, S., & Chen, Z. (2019). Improvement k-Nearest Neighbor Classification Algorithm Based on Reference Points. Jisuanji Gongcheng/Computer Engineering, 45(2). https://doi.org/10.19678/j.issn.1000-3428.0049901

Rutkowski, L., Jaworski, M., & Duda, P. (2020). Decision Trees in Data Stream Mining. In Studies in Big Data (Vol. 56). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13962-9_3

Tran, T. T., Phan, N. Q., & Huynh, H. X. (2025). Random Forest Model Parameters Optimization. In Communications in Computer and Information Science: Vol. 2191 CCIS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-9616-8_19

Podder, S., & Mukherjee, S. (2024). RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY (RSM) AS A TOOL IN PHARMACEUTICAL FORMULATION DEVELOPMENT. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, 17(11), 18–25. https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2024v17i11.52149

Mahmoodi, V., & Sargolzaei, J. (2014). Optimization of photocatalytic degradation of naphthalene using nano-TiO2/UV system: statistical analysis by a response surface methodology. Desalination and Water Treatment, 52(34–36). https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2013.861774

Onyelowe, K. C., Kamchoom, V., Hanandeh, S., Ebid, A. M., Llamuca Llamuca, J. L., Cayán Martínez, J. C., Rose, E., Awoyera, P., & Avudaiappan, S. (2025). Predicting the strengths of basalt fiber reinforced concrete mixed with fly ash using AML and Hoffman and Gardener techniques. Scientific Reports, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-96420-w

Paleari, L., Movedi, E., Zoli, M., Burato, A., Cecconi, I., Errahouly, J., Pecollo, E., Sorvillo, C., & Confalonieri, R. (2021). Sensitivity analysis using Morris: Just screening or an effective ranking method? Ecological Modelling, 455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2021.109648

Hoffman, F. O., & Gardner, R. H. (1983). Evaluation of uncertainties in radiological assessment models. Radiological Assessment: A Textbook on Environmental Dose Analysis.

Wu, Y., & Liu, S. (2014). A suggestion for computing objective function in model calibration. Ecological Informatics, 24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2014.08.002

Robeson, S. M., & Willmott, C. J. (2023). Decomposition of the mean absolute error (MAE) into systematic and unsystematic components. Plos One, 18(2 February). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279774

Chicco, D., Warrens, M. J., & Jurman, G. (2021). The coefficient of determination R-squared is more informative than SMAPE, MAE, MAPE, MSE and RMSE in regression analysis evaluation. PeerJ Computer Science, 7. https://doi.org/10.7717/PEERJ-CS.623

Willmott, C. J., & Matsuura, K. (2005). Advantages of the mean absolute error (MAE) over the root mean square error (RMSE) in assessing average model performance. Climate Research, 30(1). https://doi.org/10.3354/cr030079

Turney, S. (2022). Coefficient of determination (R2): Calculation and interpretation. Scribbr

Downloads

Published

2025-09-09

How to Cite

Fuqaha, S., Zaki , A., & Nugroho , G. (2025). Machine Learning and RSM for Strength Forecasting in Sustainable SCGC. IIUM Engineering Journal, 26(3), 53–88. https://doi.org/10.31436/iiumej.v26i3.3730

Issue

Section

Civil and Environmental Engineering

Most read articles by the same author(s)