الدخيل المعاصر على التفسير القرآني وأثره: تفسير المراغي نموذجاً

Contemporary Intrusion to the Qur’anic Interpretation and its Impact: Al-Maraghi’s Tafsir as a Model

Authors

  • Maher bin Ghazali PhD Student In Quran And Sunnah
  • Radwan Jamal Elatrash International Islamic University Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31436/alburhn.v6i3.277

Abstract

The Qur’anic interpretation of al-Maraghi is regarded as one of the contemporary interpretations that focused on elucidating the meanings of the Holy Qur'an while considering the sentiments of the people and society, as it included many digressions that flowed beyond the limits of Tafsir. So, this study aimed to explain the concept of intrusion based on al-Maraghi's interpretation of the Qur’an al-Karim, and then discover the aspects of intrusion in his interpretation. The researchers adopted two approaches to accomplish these objectives: the inductive methodology, to trace the digressions included in al-Maraghi's interpretation, then the analytical methodology to study and discuss the intrusion aspects of al-Maraghi's interpretation, as well as its impact on his interpretation. The study concluded that al-Maraghi lacks a clear understanding of the intrusion in his interpretation; because once he criticizes other interpreters for digressions in their interpretations, he himself commits the same practice. This was evident through his citation from the previous divine books, his detailed analysis while explaining jurisprudential issues, reviewing scientific terminology and issues, and his discussion of social and political issues, which caused him to divert from the main objective of interpretation and opened the avenues for strange opinions contrary to Ijmāʿ, as well as flexibility in amending Quranic terminology. The most significant result of the study is that the main criterion of interpretation is what the predecessors (Salaf) carried out in their interpretations in clarifying the linguistic meaning of the Quranic verses. Additionally, considering the components that interpreters include in their interpretations as an intrusion does not necessarily mean that there are no benefits in it; rather, it may have many advantages, but only within its field and area of expertise.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ʻAbbās, Faḍl Ḥasan. (2005). al-tafsīr asāsyāth wa-ittijāhātuhu. ʻAmmān: Maktabat Dandīs.

_____. (2016). al-tafsīr wa-al-mufassirūn. ʻAmmān: Dār al-Nafāʼis.

Abū Jaʻfar al-Naḥḥās, Aḥmad ibn Muḥammad ibn Ismāʻīl. (1988). Maʻānī al-Qurʼān al-Karīm, taḥqīq: Muḥammad ʻAlī al-Ṣābūnī. Makkah: Jāmiʻat Umm al-Qurá.

al-Biqāʻī, Ibrāhīm ibn ʻUmar. (n.d.). Naẓm al-Durar fī tanāsub al-āyāt wa-al-suwar. Cairo: Dār al-Kitāb al-Islāmī.

al-Bukhārī, Muḥammad ibn Ismāʻīl. (2012). Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī. Cairo: Dār al-taʼṣīl.

al-Dhahabī, Muḥammad Ḥusayn. (2010). al-Tafsīr wa-al-Mufassirūn. Riyāḍh: Wizārat al-Ghumārī, ʻAbd Allāh Muḥammad al-Ṣiddīq. (1986). Bidaʻ al-tafāsīr, Rabāṭ: Dār al-Rashād al-ḥadīthah.

Ibn Ḥayyān, Muḥammad ibn Yūsuf al-Andalusi. (2015). al-Baḥr al-muḥīṭ, (Māhir Ḥabūsh, Ed.). Damascus: Dār al-Risālah al-ʻĀlamīyah.

Ibn Juzayy al-Kalbī, Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad al-Gharnāṭī al-Mālikī. (2013). al-Tasʹhīl li-ʻUlūm al-tanzīl. (Muḥammad ibn Sīdī Mawlāy, Ed.). Kuwait: Dār al-Ḍiyāʼ.

Ibn Qāsim, ʻAbd-al-Raḥmān ibn Muḥammad. (n.d.). Majmūʻ Fatāwá Shaykh al-Islām Aḥmad ibn Taymīyah. Riyāḍh: Majmaʻ al-Malik Fahd li-Ṭibāʻat al-Muṣḥaf al-Sharīf.

Ibn Taymīyah, Aḥmad ibn ʻAbdul Halim. (1972). Muqaddimah fī uṣūl al-tafsīr. (ʻAdnān Zarzūr, Ed.). Damascus: Jāmiʻat Dimashq.

al-Khaṭīb, Aḥmad Saʻd. (2010). Mafātīḥ al-tafsīr. Riyadh: Dār al-Tadmurīyah.

al-Kūrānī, Aḥmad ibn Ismāʻīl al-Shāfiʻī al-Ḥanafī. (2008). al-Kawthar al-jārī ilá Riyāḍ aḥādīth al-Bukhārī. (Aḥmad ʻIzzū ʻInāyat, Ed.). Beirūt: Dār Iḥyāʼ al-Turāth al-ʻArabī.

al-Marāghī, Aḥmad Muṣṭafá. (1946). Tafsīr al-Marāghī. Cairo: Sharikat Maktabat wa-Maṭbaʻat Muṣṭafá al-Bābī al-Ḥalabī wa-Awlāduh bi-Miṣr.

Naʻnāʻah, Ramzī. (1970). al-Isrāʼīlīyāt wa-atharuhā fī kutub al-tafsīr. Damascus: Dār al-Qalam.

al-Najjār, Jamāl Muṣṭafá ʻAbd-al-Ḥamīd. (2007). Uṣūl al-Dukhayyil fī tafsīr āy al-tanzīl. Cairo: Jāmiʻat al-Azhar.

al-Qannawjī, Ṣiddīq ibn Ḥasan al-Bukhārī. (1992). Fatḥ al-Bayān fī Maqāṣid al-Qurʼān. (ʻAbd Allāh ibn Ibrāhīm al-Anṣārī, Ed.). Beirūt: al-Maktabah al-ʻAṣrīyah.

Rashīd Riḍā, Muḥammad. (1947). Tafsīr al-Qurʼān al-Ḥakīm al-mushtahir bi-tafsīr al-Manār. al-Qāhirah: Dār al-Manār.

al-Rūmī, Fahd ibn ʻAbd-al-Raḥmān ibn Sulayān. (1983). Manhaj al-Madrasah al-ʻaqlīyah al-ḥadīthah fī al-tafsīr. Riyadh: Muʼassasat al-Risālah.

______. Taḥrīf al-muṣṭalaḥāt al-Qurʼānīyah wa-atharuhu fī inḥirāf al-tafsīr fī al-qarn al-rābiʻ ʻashar. Riyadh: Maktabat al-Malik Fahd al-Waṭanīyah.

Shaltūt, Maḥmūd. (1981). Tafsīr al-Qurʼān al-Karīm. al-Qāhirah: Dār al-Shurūq.

al-Suyūṭī, ʻAbd al-Raḥmān ibn Abī Bakr al-Shāfiʻī. (n.d.). al-Itqān fī ʻulūm al-Qurʼān. (Muḥammad Abū al-Faḍl Ibrāhīm, Ed.). Riyadh: Wizārat al-Shuʼūn al-Islāmīyah wa-al-Awqāf wa-al-Daʻwah wa-al-Irshād.

Yaʻqūb, Ṭāhir Maḥmūd Muḥammad. (1425H). Asbāb. al-khaṭaʼ fī al-tafsīr. Riyāḍh: Dār Ibn al-Jawzī.

al-Zurqānī, Muḥammad ʻAbd al-ʻAẓīm. (n.d.). Manāhil al-ʻIrfān fī ʻulūm al-Qurʼān. Cairo: Maṭbaʻat ʻĪsá al-Bābī al-Ḥalabī wa-Shurakāh.

Published

2022-12-30

How to Cite

Maher, and Radwan Jamal Elatrash. 2022. “الدخيل المعاصر على التفسير القرآني وأثره: تفسير المراغي نموذجاً: Contemporary Intrusion to the Qur’anic Interpretation and Its Impact: Al-Maraghi’s Tafsir As a Model”. AL-BURHĀN: JOURNAL OF QURʾĀN AND SUNNAH STUDIES 6 (3). Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.:109-27. https://doi.org/10.31436/alburhn.v6i3.277.

Issue

Section

Articles