موقف الإمام ابن برَّجان من القراءات القرآنية في تفسيره تنبيه الأفهام: دراسة استقرائية تحليلية

The Position of al-Imām Ibn Barrajān on the Qurʾanic Qirāʾāt in his Tafsīr Tanbīh al-Afhām: An Analytical Inductive Study

Authors

  • Mohamed Abdelmonem Elsayed Khalil Senior Lecturer, Department of Qurʾan and Its Sciences, Faculty of al-Qurʾan and al-Sunnah, Kolej Universiti Islam Perlis (KUIPs), Malaysia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31436/alburhn.v6i2.254

Keywords:

Ibn Barrajān, Tanbīh al-Afhām, Qurʾanic variant Readings, Qurʾanic exegesis, the authority of qirāʾāt

Abstract

This study examined the position of Ibn Barrajān on the Qurʾanic qirāʾāt in his exegetical work titled Tanbīh al-Afhām. Since this book was not a reference in the knowledge of qirāʾāt, and there is confusion between the mutawātir and shādhdh qirāʾāt in his exegesis, this study aims to differentiate between them, and to identify the position of Ibn Barrajān regarding them in terms of acceptance and rejection, as well as to clarify his position in preferring between the qirāʾāt, and on invoking the Qurʾanic qirāʾāt in his interpretation, as well as his method of employing them. In this research, the following approaches were adopted: (i) the inductive approach – represented in tracing the points related to qirāʾāt in the interpretation of Tanbīh al-Afhām; (ii) the analytical approach -through the scientific analysis of these texts; (iii) the descriptive approach -based on describing the results that was reached after analysis and extrapolation by dividing the study into chapters and scientific investigations. The researcher concluded that the number of positions in which there was a disagreement between the mutawātir qirāʾāt amounted to seventy-nine, and the number of positions in which there was a disagreement between the shādhdh qirāʾāt amounted to two hundred and twenty-four. Then the researcher made an analytical study to find out the number of mutawātir and shādhdh qirāʾāt that were mentioned in these places, as well as the number of attributed and unattributed qirāʾāt, as well as the position of Ibn Barrajān on rejecting and preferring between the qirāʾāt and on invoking the qirāʾāt in his exegesis. The researcher suggests that attention should be given to studying the Qurʾanic qirāʾāt contained in the books of exegesis, especially the classical ones, and to differentiate the mutawātir from the shādhdh. It is also necessary to have good faith and be respectful in commenting on and refuting the scholars of tafsīr who affirmed or denied mutawātir qirāʾāt.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abū Ḥayyān, Muḥammad ibn Yūsuf al-Andalusī. al-Baḥr al-Muḥīṭ Fī al-Tafsīr. Edited by Sidqī Muḥammad Jamīl. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr, 1999.

al-Bukhārī, Muḥammad ibn Ismāʿīl Abū ʿAbd Allah. al-Jāmiʿ al-Musnad al-Ṣaḥīḥ al-Mukhtaṣar Min Umūr Rasul Allah Wa Sunanihi Wa Ayyāmihi. Edited by Muhammad Zuhair al-Nasir. Beirut: Dār Ṭawq al-Najāh, 2001.

al-Dānī, ʿUthman ibn Saʿīd Abū ʿAmru. al-Muqniʿ Fī Rasm Maṣāḥif al-Amṣār. Cairo: Maktabah al-Kulliyyāt al-Azhariyyah, n.d.

al-Dhahabī, Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad ibn ʿUthmān Abū ʿAbd Allah. Siyar Aʿlām al-Nubalāʾ. Edited by Shuʿayb al-Arnāʾūṭ. Beirut: Muʾassasah al-Risālah, 1985.

al-Kirmānī, Muḥammad ibn Abī Naṣr. Shawādhdh al-Qirāʾāt. Beirut: Muʾassasah al-Balāgh, n.d.

al-Naḥḥās, Aḥmad ibn Muḥammad Abū Jaʿfar. Iʿrāb al-Qurʾān. Edited by ʿAbd al-Munʿim Khalīl Ibrāhīm. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah, 2000.

al-Qaysī, Makkī ibn Abī Ṭālib. Mushkil Iʿrāb al-Qurʾān. Beirut: Muʾassasah al-Risālah, 1984.

al-Samīn al-Ḥalabī, Aḥmad ibn Yūsuf. al-Durr al-Maṣūn Fī ʿUlūm al-Kitāb al-Maknūn. Damascus: Dār al-Qalam, n.d.

al-Tirmidhī, Muḥammad ibn ʿĪsā Abū ʿĪsā. al-Jāmiʿ al-Kabīr. Edited by Bashar Awwad Maʿruf. Beirut: Dar al-Gharb al-Islami, 1998.

al-Zurqānī, Muḥammad ʿAbd al-ʿAẓīm. Manāhil al-ʿIrfān Fī ʿUlūm al-Qurʾān. Cairo: Maṭbaʿah ʿĪsā al-Ḥalabī wa Sharīkāh, 1954.

Ḥibsh, Muḥammad. al-Qirāʾāt al-Mutawātirah Wa Atharuhā Fī al-Rasm al-Qurʾānī Wa al-Aḥkām al-Sharʿiyyah. Damascus: Dār al-Fikr, 1999.

Ibn al-Jawzī, ʿAbd al-Raḥmān ibn ʿAlī Abū al-Faraj. Ghāyat al-Nihāyah Fī Ṭabaqāt al-Qurrāʾ. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah, 2006.

Ibn al-Jazarī, Muḥammad ibn Muḥammad Abū al-Khayr Shams al-Dīn. al-Nashr Fī al-Qirāʾāt al-ʿAshr. Beirut: al-Maktabah al-ʿAṣriyyah, 2010.

Ibn Barrajān, ʿAbd al-Salām ibn ʿAbd al-Raḥmān al-Ishbīlī. Tanbīh al-Afhām Ilā Tadabbur al-Kitāb al-Ḥakīm Wa Taʿarruf al-Āyāt Wa al-Nabaʾ al-ʿAẓīm. Edited by Aḥmad Farīd al-Mazyadī. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah, 2013.

Ibn Ḥanbal, Aḥmad ibn Muḥammad Abū Abd Allāh. al-Musnad. Edited by Shuʿayb al-Arnāʾūṭ. Beirut: Muʾassasah al-Risālah, 2001.

Ibn Jarīr al-Ṭabarī, Muḥammad Abū Jaʿfar. Jāmiʿ al-Bayān Fī Taʾwīl Āy al-Qurʾān. Beirut: Muʾassasah al-Risālah, 2000.

Ibn Jinnī, ʿUthmān Abū al-Fatḥ. al-Muḥtasab Fī Tabyīn Wujūh Shawādhdh al-Qirāʾāt Wa al-ʾĪḍāḥ ʿAnhā. al-Majlis al-Aʿlā li’l-Shuʾūn al-Islāmiyyah, 1999.

Ibn Khālawayh, al-Ḥusayn ibn Aḥmad. Mukhtaṣar Fī Shawādhdh al-Qurʾān Min Kitāb al-Badī. Cairo: Maktabah al-Mutanabbī, n.d.

Ibn Mihrān al-Aṣfahānī, Aḥmad ibn al-Ḥusayn Abū Bakr. al-Mabsūṭ Fī al-Qirāʾāt al-ʿAshr. Damascus: Majmaʿ al-Lughah al-ʿArabiyyah, n.d.

Ibn Zanjalah, ʿAbd al-Raḥmān ibn Muḥammad Abū Zurʿah. Ḥujjat al-Qirāʾāt. Dār al-Risālah, n.d.

Published

2022-08-30

How to Cite

Elsayed Khalil , Mohamed Abdelmonem. 2022. “موقف الإمام ابن برَّجان من القراءات القرآنية في تفسيره تنبيه الأفهام: دراسة استقرائية تحليلية : The Position of Al-Imām Ibn Barrajān on the Qurʾanic Qirāʾāt in His Tafsīr Tanbīh Al-Afhām: An Analytical Inductive Study”. AL-BURHĀN: JOURNAL OF QURʾĀN AND SUNNAH STUDIES 6 (2). Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.:52-71. https://doi.org/10.31436/alburhn.v6i2.254.

Issue

Section

Articles