A prosthetic-surgical approach for aesthetic treatment of peri-implant soft tissue defects: A case report

Authors

  • Mohamad Adib Jaafar Periodontal Specialist Clinic of Jalan Perak, Ministry of Health Malaysia, 11600, Jelutong, Penang, Malaysia & Periodontal Specialist Clinic of Mak Mandin, Ministry of Health Malaysia, 13400, Butterworth, Penang, Malaysia.
  • Sharul Nisha Ali Periodontal Specialist Clinic of Mak Mandin, Ministry of Health Malaysia, 13400, Butterworth, Penang, Malaysia.
  • Siti Nurqissa Mustafa Periodontal Specialist Clinic of Mak Mandin, Ministry of Health Malaysia, 13400, Butterworth, Penang, Malaysia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31436/ijohs.v5i2.311

Keywords:

augmentation, complication, connective tissue, dental implant, recession

Abstract

Peri-implant soft tissue defects (PSTD) in the esthetic zone affect approximately 54% cases of post-implant insertion, leading to aesthetic concerns and increasing the risk of peri-implantitis. Various surgical techniques are aimed at addressing these issues, but the outcomes can be unpredictable, especially for severely mispositioned implants. This report details a combined prosthetic and surgical approach to treat a severely angulated single central maxillary implant with mid-labial mucosal recession. A 38-year-old female expressed dissatisfaction with the implant at 21 area, which appeared elongated due to peri-implant mucosal recession of almost 4 mm. Treatment involved two phases: 1) prosthetic phase involves replacing the original crown of implant at 21 area with a temporary crown to promote mucosal growth and 2) surgical phase that involves soft tissue surgery three months later using an envelope flap technique at the recipient site and a connective tissue graft harvested from the palate. Upon three months after the surgery, full coverage with thick mucosal tissue was achieved, and a new zirconia crown was placed. The outcome remained stable throughout the nine-month follow-up. This case demonstrates that PSTD in angulated implants in the esthetic zone can be effectively treated through a combination of prosthetic and surgical modalities.

References

Al-Diasty, Z., El-Meadawy, S., Salem, A. S., & Mowafey, B. (2022). Onlay platelet-rich fibrin membrane versus free gingival graft in increasing the width of keratinized mucosa around dental implants: A split-mouth randomized clinical study. Journal of Advanced Periodontology & Implant Dentistry, 14(2), 53-61.

Alrmali, A., Stuhr, S., Saleh, M. H. A., Latimer, J., Kan, J., Tarnow, D. P., et al. (2023). A decision-making tree for evaluating an esthetically compromised single dental implant. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, 35(8), 1239-1248.

Bengazi, F., Wennström, J. L., & Lekholm, U. (1996). Recession of the soft tissue margin at oral implants. A 2-year longitudinal prospective study. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 7(4), 303-310.

Burkhardt, R., Joss, A., & Lang, N. P. (2008). Soft tissue dehiscence coverage around endosseous implants: a prospective cohort study. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 19(5), 451-457.

Dellavia, C., Ricci, G., Pettinari, L., Allievi, C., Grizzi, F., & Gagliano, N. (2014). Human palatal and tuberosity mucosa as donor sites for ridge augmentation. International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry, 34(2), 179-186.

Kotsailidi, E. A., Tatakis, D. N., Chen, Y. W., Caton, J. G., Ercoli, C., Barmak, A. B., et al. (2022). Comparison of maxillary tuberosity and palatal donor sites for soft tissue augmentation at implant placement: A pilot controlled clinical study. International Journal of Oral Implantology, 15(4), 353-365.

Kourkouta, S., Dedi, K. D., Paquette, D. W., & Mol, A. (2009). Interproximal tissue dimensions in relation to adjacent implants in the anterior maxilla: clinical observations and patient aesthetic evaluation. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 20(12), 1375-1385.

Roccuzzo, M., Bonino, F., Aglietta, M., Dalmasso, P. (2012). Ten-year results of a three arms prospective cohort study on implants in periodontally compromised patients. Part 2: Clinical results. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 23(4), 389-395.

Roccuzzo, M., Roccuzzo, A., & Ramanuskaite, A. (2018). Papilla height in relation to the distance between bone crest and interproximal contact point at single-tooth implants: A systematic review. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 29 (Suppl 15), 50-61.

Rojo, E., Stroppa, G., Sanz-Martin, I., Gonzalez-Martín, O., Alemany, A. S., & Nart, J. (2018). Soft tissue volume gain around dental implants using autogenous subepithelial connective tissue grafts harvested from the lateral palate or tuberosity area. A randomized controlled clinical study. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 45(4), 495-503.

Sanz-Martín, I., Rojo, E., Maldonado, E., Stroppa, G., Nart, J., & Sanz, M. (2019). Structural and histological differences between connective tissue grafts harvested from the lateral palatal mucosa or from the tuberosity area. Clinical Oral Investigations, 23(2), 957-964.

Sculean, A., Chappuis, V., & Cosgarea, R. (2017). Coverage of mucosal recessions at dental implants. Periodontology 2000, 73(1), 134-140.

Small, P. N., Tarnow, D. P., & Cho, S. C. (2001). Gingival recession around wide-diameter versus standard-diameter implants: a 3- to 5-year longitudinal prospective study. Practical Procedures in Aesthetic Dentistry, 13(2), 143-146.

Stefanini, M., Marzadori, M., Sangiorgi, M., Rendon, A., Testori, T., & Zucchelli, G. (2023). Complications and treatment errors in peri-implant soft tissue management. Periodontology 2000, 92(1), 263-277.

Surdiacourt, L., Christiaens, V., De Bruyckere, T., De Buyser, S., Eghbali, A., Vervaeke, S.,. et al. (2024). A multi-centre randomized controlled trial comparing connective tissue graft with collagen matrix to increase soft tissue thickness at the buccal aspect of single implants: 3-Year results. Journal of Clinical Periodontology.

Tarnow, D., Elian, N., Fletcher, P., Froum, S., Magner, A., Cho, S. C., et al.. (2003). Vertical distance from the crest of bone to the height of the interproximal papilla between adjacent implants. Journal of Periodontology, 74(12), 1785-1788.

Tavelli, L., Barootchi, S., Majzoub, J., Chan, H. L., Stefanini, M., Zucchelli, G., et al. (2022). Prevalence and risk indicators of midfacial peri-implant soft tissue dehiscence at single site in the esthetic zone: A cross-sectional clinical and ultrasonographic study. Journal of Periodontology, 93(6), 857-866.

Zucchelli, G., Mazzotti, C., Mounssif, I., Marzadori, M., Stefanini, M. (2013). Esthetic treatment of peri-implant soft tissue defects: a case report of a modified surgical-prosthetic approach. International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry, 33(3), 327-35.

Zucchelli, G., Tavelli, L., Stefanini, M., Barootchi, S., Mazzotti, C., Gori, G., et al. (2019). Classification of facial peri-implant soft tissue dehiscence/deficiencies at single implant sites in the esthetic zone. Journal of Periodontology, 90(10), 1116-1124.

Downloads

Published

2024-07-31

How to Cite

Jaafar, M. A., Ali, S. N. ., & Mustafa, S. N. . (2024). A prosthetic-surgical approach for aesthetic treatment of peri-implant soft tissue defects: A case report. IIUM Journal of Orofacial and Health Sciences, 5(2), 236–242. https://doi.org/10.31436/ijohs.v5i2.311