Enhancing Muslim Studies of Other Religions Through Digital Technologies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31436/jia.v22i1.1250الكلمات المفتاحية:
Muslim Studies of Other Religions, Integration of Usuluddin and Digital Technologies, Digital Application, Interreligious Understanding, Social Inclusionالملخص
Digital technologies have fundamentally transformed contemporary lifestyles and have significantly impacted both formal and informal learning. The study of religions, without exception, must leverage digital technologies to enhance its societal roles and impact. This paper therefore explores the possibility of adopting an innovative approach in Muslim scholarship on religions by introducing the use of digital applications in the study of other religions, a vital sub-discipline of Usuluddin. Additionally, the paper examines how digital technologies can foster a more inclusive approach to understanding diverse religious perspectives thereby promoting positive inter-religious dialogue and meaningful engagement. Through qualitative interviews with experts in religious studies, this paper presents their insights and recommendations on the conceptualisation of the digital application. Based on these findings, the paper argues for a symbiotic relationship between the traditional approaches and digital technologies. This integration is essential not only to maintain the relevance of Muslim studies on other religions in the digital age but also to advocate for interreligious understanding, which is instrumental in achieving social harmony.
المراجع
A. Campbell, Heidi. “The Dynamic Future of Digital Religion Studies.” In Stepping Back and Looking Ahead: Twelve Years of Studying Religious Contact at the Käte Hamburger Kolleg Bochum, 13:217–36. Dynamics in the History of Religions. BRILL, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004549319.
A. Cardona, Miguel, Roberto J. Rodríguez, and Kristina Ishmael. “Artificial Intelligence and Future of Teaching and Learning: Insights and Recommendations.” Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology, 2023. https://tech.ed.gov.
Al Faruqi, Ismail Raji. “Meta-Religion: Towards A Critical World Theology.” American Journal of Islam and Society 3, no. 1 (September 1, 1986): 13–57. https://doi.org/10.35632/ajis.v3i1.2902.
Al-Faruqi, Ismaʾil Ragi. Christian Ethics: A Historical and Systematic Analysis of Its Dominant Ideas. Montreal, Canada: McGill University Press, 1967.
Bond, Julian, and Alice Sandham. “Can Interfaith Dialogue Happen Online?” Can Interfaith Dialogue Happen Online? (blog), May 29, 2017. https://www.woolf.cam.ac.uk/blog/can-interfaith-dialogue-happen-online.
Bouma, Gary. “Religious Diversity and the Challenge of Social Inclusion.” Social Inclusion 4, no. 2 (April 19, 2016): 1–2. https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v4i2.631.
Denkewicz, Patricia. “Social Inclusion and Social Exclusion: A Necessary Conceptual Discussion.” In Multidisciplinary Perspectives: Integrating Knowledge, 1st ed. Seven Editora, 2024. https://doi.org/10.56238/sevened2024.007-069.
Díez Bosch, Míriam, Josep Lluís Micó Sanz, and Alba Sabaté Gauxachs. “Typing My Religion. Digital Use of Religious Webs and Apps by Adolescents and Youth for Religious and Interreligious Dialogue.” Church, Communication and Culture 2, no. 2 (June 16, 2017): 121–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/23753234.2017.1347800.
Eck, D. L. “Prospects for Pluralism: Voice and Vision in the Study of Religion.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 75, no. 4 (October 17, 2007): 743–76. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/lfm061.
Eck, Diana L. “A New Religious America: Managing Religious Diversity in a Democracy: Challenges and Prospects for the 21st Century.” Kuala Lumpur, 2002. https://www.pcc.edu/illumination/wp-content/uploads/sites/54/2018/05/article-a-new-religious-america
———. On Common Ground: World Religions in America. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Columbia University Press, 2002.
Harry, Alexandara. “Role of AI in Education.” Interdiciplinary Journal and Hummanity (INJURITY) 2, no. 3 (March 24, 2023): 260–68. https://doi.org/10.58631/injurity.v2i3.52.
Højsgaard, Morten T., and Margit Warburg, eds. Religion and Cyberspace. 1st ed. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2005.
Ibrahim, Haslina. “In Defence of Religious Truth: The Crisis of Intellectual Veracity in the Study of Religion.” In Kalam And Its Relevance In Muslim Scholarship Of Religion: An Integrated Approach, edited by Haslina Ibrahim. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: IIUM Press, 2023.
Jacoba, Rico C. “Exploring the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Interreligious Discourse.” Religion and Social Communication 21, no. 2 (December 31, 2023): 375–400. https://doi.org/10.62461/RCJ100323.
Khorchide, Mouhanad, and Ufuk Topkara. “A Contribution to Comparative Theology: Probing the Depth of Islamic Thought.” Religions 4, no. 1 (January 31, 2013): 67–76. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel4010067.
Lawrence, Bruce B., and Muḥammad ibn Abd al-Karim Shahrastānī. Shahrastānī on the Indian Religions. Religion and Society ; 4. The Hague: Mouton, 1976.
Lövheim, Mia, and Heidi A Campbell. “Considering Critical Methods and Theoretical Lenses in Digital Religion Studies.” New Media & Society 19, no. 1 (January 2017): 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816649911.
O’Leary, Stephen D. “Cyberspace as Sacred Space: Communicating Religion on Computer Networks.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 64, no. 4 (1996): 781–808.
Saeed, Abdullah. “Inclusivism and Exclusivism among Muslims Today between Theological and Social Dimensions.” S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, 2020.
Tayob, Abdulkader. “Al-Fārūqī between the History of Religions and Islamic Theology,” no. 60 (2013): 230–50.
———. “The Study of Religion and Social Crises: Arab-Islamic Discourse in Late Twentieth Century.” In Regional, Critical, and Historical Approaches, edited by Peter Antes, Armin W. Geertz, and Randi R. Warne, 101–26. Walter de Gruyter, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110211702.1.101.
Waardenburg, Jacques. Muslim Perceptions of Other Religions: A Historical Survey. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.
