أهمية الإقرار في إثبات جريمة الزنا في الشريعة الإسلامية والقانون الجنائي ولاية كلنتن عام 2015م
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31436/jia.v20i1.1115Keywords:
الإقرار, الزنا, الشريعة والقانونAbstract
الإقرار سيد الأدلة له أهمية كبيرة في إثبات أي جريمة بصفة عامة وجريمة الزنا بصفة خاصة لأن الشهادة شبه مستحلية في إثبات هذه الجريمة، فلم تثبت هذه الجريمة على مدار التاريخ إلا بالإقرار. ولأن الإقرار أو الإعتراف نابع عن الشعور بالمسؤلية الكاملة والندم العميق فهما باعثان لابتغاء العفو والمغفرة من الله تعالى ولو يؤدي إلى هلاك نفس المقر، ولخطورة الموقف الذي يقفه المقر أمام المحكمة في جريمة الزنا، لابد أن يضع الشارع هناك ضوابط صحيحة ودقيقة في قبول الإقرار أو الإعتراف في الشريعة الإسلامية والقانون الجنائي بولاية كلنتن التي استنبط مواده منها، حتى لا يكون محل تهمة أمام الجاهلين والمستهزئين، فمن هنا خطر على بال الباحث ولا سيما في ظل هذه الظروف الحرجة، من خلال الهجمة الشرسة على الشريعة الإسلامية الغراء، ومن سقم وفشل القوانين الوضعية ومن فقدان العدالة الإنسانية فيكون مسؤلية البيان والتوضيح لمفهوم الإقرار وما يتعلق به خاصة في بث الوعي العام للناس عن مميزات الشريعة الإسلامية السمحة.وهذا البحث يتناول القضية من خلال الدراسة المكتبية المعتمدة على مؤلفات الأئمة المجتهدين والعلماء المنشورة على مر العصور في المكتبات الإسلامية في بيان تعريف الإقرار وشروطه كما بينه الفقهاء في كتبهم، مقارنة بالقانون الجنائي الشرعي بولاية كلنتن عام 2015م وتتركز الدراسة حول مفهوم الإقرار وشروطه. من خلال الدراسة يتضح أن مفهوم الإقرار في القانون سارية مع مفهوم الإقرار في الشريعة الإسلامية، فلا يقبل قول القائل بأن القانون (خاصة في مواد الإقرار) مخالف للشريعة الإسلامية، وهو كذلك صالح للتطبيق
Abstract
Confession, is the master of evidence, is of great importance in proving any crime in general and the crime of adultery in particular, because eyewitness evidence is almost impossible to prove, and it is proven throughout history only by confession. Because the admission or confession stems from a feeling of full responsibility and deep remorse, and they are triggers for seeking forgiveness from God, even if it leads to the death of the witness. Confession held a great risk to the confessor, that is why drafters of the criminal enactment (II) of the state of Kelantan have outlined certain methods in accepting confessions so that it is parallel between enactment and Shariah, the confession process cannot be done arbitrarily, this has awaken the awareness of the researcher, especially in critical situations, that there is fierce attack against the Islamic Sharia, the failure of man-made laws and the loss of justice, thus there is a deep sense of responsibility to explain the concept of confession and its conditions as well as matters related to it in the form of a comparison between Sharia and enactment, in order to spread public awareness about the advantages of tolerant Islamic Sharia. This research is based on library study and literature reviews of the diligent imams and scholars published throughout the ages in Islamic libraries to clarify the definition of acknowledgment and its conditions, as explained by the jurists in their books, compared to the enactment in the state of Kelantan in 2015. The study focuses on the concept of acknowledgment and its conditions. Through the study, it becomes clear that the concept of confession in the enactment is in force with the concept of confession in Islamic Sharia. The statement that the enactment (especially in the articles of confession) is not acceptable to the Shari’a, but is valid for application.
Keywords: Confession, Adultery, Sharīʿa, and Law.
References
‘Alā’uddīn Al-Kasānī, Badā’ī' Assanā’ī', (Beirūt: Dār Al-Kutub Al-‘Arabīyyah, 1982)
‘Alī Bin Ahmad Bin Sa’īd Bin Hazam Al-Andalūsī Abu Muhammad, Tahqīq Abdul Ghafar Sulaiman Al-Bandārī, Al-Mahallī Bil-‘Āthār, (Beirūt: Darul Kutub Al-‘Ilmiyyah)
‘Alī Bin Sulaimān Al-Mardawī Abul Hassan, Tahqīq Muhammad Hamīd Al-Faqi, Al-Insāf Fī Ma’rifah Ar-Rājih Minal-Khilāf ‘Alā Mazhab Al-Imām Ahmad Bin Hanbal, (Beirūt: Dār Ihyā’ At-Turāth Al-‘Arabī)
‘Alī Hasan Majallī, Al-Muhakamah Fī Qanūn Al-Ijrā’āt Al-Yamanī, (San’ā: Maktabah Khālid Bin Al-Wālid, 2002)
‘Uthmān Bin Shatā Al-Bakrī Abu Bakar Ad-Dimyātī, I’ānah At-Tālibīn ‘Alā Halli Alfāz Al-Mu’ayyan, (Dār Ihyā’ Al-Kutub Al-‘Arabiyah ‘Isā Al-Bābī Al-Halabī, 1300H)
Abdul Nāsir Mūsā Abū Basal, Nazarīyyah Al-Hukm Fī Ash-Sharī’ah Wal Qānūn, (Omān: Dārul Nafā’is, 2000)
Abdul Rahmān Bin Abī Birr As-Sayūthī, Al-‘Ashbāh Wan-Nazā’ir, (Beirūt: Dār Al-Kutub Al-‘Lmīyah, 1403H)
Abdul Wahāb Bin ‘Alī Bin Nasr Ath-Tha’labī Al-Mālikī Abu Muhammad, Tahqīq Muhammad Thālith Sa’īd Al-Ghani, At-Talqīn Fi Fiqhi Al-Māliki, (Makkah: Al-Maktabah At-Tijārīyah, 1415H)
Abdullah Bin Ahmad Bin Qudāmah Al-Maqdisī Abu Muhammad, Al-Mughnī Sharh Mukhtasar Al-Kharāqī, (Dār Ihyā’ At-Turāth Al-‘Arabī, 1405H)
Abu ‘Umar Yūsuf Bin Abdullah Bin Abdul Barr An-Namarī, At-Tamhīd Limā Fil-Muwatta’ Minal Ma’ānī Wal-Asānīd, (Al-Maghrib: Wizārah ‘Umum Al-Awqāf Wash-Shu’un Al-Islāmīyah, 1387H)
Ad-Dār Al-Mukhtār, (Beirut: Dār Al-Fikr, 1386H)
Ahamd Bin Idrīs Al-Qarāfī Shihābuddīn, Tahqiq Muhammad Hajji, Sa’īd A’rab, Muhammad Bu Khibzah, Wazzukhayrah, (Dārul Gharbi Al-Islāmī, 1994)
Ahmad Bin ‘Alī Ar-Rāzī Al-Jassās Abu Bakar, Ahkām Al-Qur’ān, (Beirūt: Dār Ihyā’ At-Turāth Al-‘Arabī, 1405H)
Ahmad Bin Ghanīm Bin Sālim Bin Mahna Al-Farnāwi Al-Azharī Al-Mālilkī, Tahqīq Abdul Wārith Muhammad ‘Alī, Al-Fawākih Ad-Dawānī ‘Alā Risālah Ibni Abī Zaid Al-Qairawānī, (Beirūt: Dār Al-Kutub Al-‘Ilmiyah, 1997)
Hasan Al-Jawkhadir, Sharh Qanūn ‘Usūl Muhakamāt Al-Jazā’īyyah, (Omān: Maktabah Ath-Thaqāfah Lilnashr Wattauzī’, 1992)
Ibnu ‘Ābid Muhammad ‘Ālā’uddīn Affandī, Hāsyiah Raddu Al-Mukhtār Sharh Tanwīr Al-Absār Fiqh Abū Hanīfah, (Beirūt: Dārulfikri Littabā’ah Wannashr, 2000)
Ibnu Nujaym Al-Hanafī, Al-Bahr Ar-Rā’iq Syarh Kanzu Ad-Daqā’iq, (Beirūt: Dār Al-Kutub Al-‘Ilmīyyah, 1997)
Ibnu Qudāmah Abdullah Bin Muhammad Bin Qudāmah Al-Jamā’ilī Al-Maqdisī Ad-Dimashqī Al-Hanbalī Abu Muhammad Muwafiquddīn, Tahqīq Muhammad Fāris Mus’ad Abdul Hamīd As-Sa’dānī, Al-Kāfah Fī Fiqhi Ibnu Hanbal, (Beirut: Dār Al-Kutub Al-Ilmīyah, 1994)
Ibrāhīm Bin Abil Yaman Muhammad Al-Hanafī, ‘Isā Al-Bābī Al-Halabī, Lisānul Hikam Fī Ma’rifatil Ahkām, (Qāherah, 1973)
Ibrāhīm Bin Muhammad Bin Abdullah Bin Muflih Al-Hanbalī Abu Ishak, Al-Mubdi’ Fī Sharh Al-Muqni’, (Beirūt: Al-Maktab Al-Islāmī, 1400H)
Ibrahīm Bin Muhammad Bin Sālim Bin Dhuyan, Manār As-Sayl Fī Sharh Ad-Dalīl, (Riyādh: Maktabah Al-Ma’ārif Lilnashr Wattauzī’, 1996)
Jalaluddīn Abdul Rahmān As-Sayutī, Al-Ashbāh Wannazā’ir Fī Qawā’id Wa Furū’ Fiqh Ash-Shāfī’iyah, (Beirut: Dār Al-Kutub Al-‘Ilmiyah)
Mālik Bin Anas Bin Mālik Al-Asbahī Al-Humairī, Al-Mudawwanah Al-Kubrā Riwāyah Sahnūn, (As-Sa’udīyah: Matba’ah As-Sa’ādah, 1324H)
Mansūr Bin Yūnus Bin Idrīs Al-Bahūtī, Kashf Al-Qanā’ ‘An Mutun Al-‘Iqnā’, (‘Ālam Al-Kutub, 1983)
Muhammad Bin Abdul Baqī Bin Yusuf Az-Zarqānī, Sharh Az-Zarqānī, (Beirūt: Dār Al-Kutub Al-‘Ilmiyyah, 1411H)
Muhammad Bin Abdul Wāhid As-Siwāsī As-Sakandrī Kamaluddīn Bin Al-Hamām, Ahmad Bin Qudir Qadhī Zādah, Tahqīq Abdul Razzāq Ghālib Al-Mahdī, Sharh Fathul Qādir ‘Alā Al-Hidāyah Sharh Bidāyah Al-Mubtadi’, (Dār Al-Kutub Al-‘Ilmiyyah, 2003)
Muhammad Bin Abdullah Abu Abdullah Al-Hākim An-Naisabūrī, Tahqīq Mustafā Abdul Qādir ‘Atā’ Al-Mustadrak ‘Alā As-Sohīhayn, (Beirūt: Dār Al-Kutub Al-‘Ilmiyyah, 1990)
Muhammad Bin Ahmad Ar-Ramlī Al-Ansārī, Ghāyah Al-Bayān Sharh Zaid Bin Raslān, (Beirūt: Dār Al-Ma’rifah)
Muhammad Bin Ahmad Bin Abī Sahal Shamsul A’immah As-Sarkhasī, Al-Mabsūt, (Beirūt: Dārul Ma’rifah, 1993)
Muhammad Bin Ahmad Bin Jazarī Al-Gharnatī, Al-Qawānīn Al-Fiqhiah.
Muhammad Bin Idrīs Ash-Shāfi’ī, Tahqīq Rif’āt Fauzī Abdul Muttalib, Al-Umm, (Misr: Dār Al-Wafā’ Al-Mansūrah, 2001)
Muhammad Bin Ismā’īl Abu Abdullah Al-Bukhārī Al-Ja’afī, Tahqīq Muhammad Zuhayr Bin Nāsir An-Nāsir, Al-Jāmi’ Al-Musnad As-Sohīh Al-Mukhtasar Min Umūri Rasūlillah SAW, (Dār Tawqunnajāh, 1322H)
Muhammad Bin Muhammad Al-Khatib Asy-Syarbainiy Shamsuddīn, Tahqīq ‘Alī Muhammad Ma’wadh, ‘Ādil Ahmad Abdul Maujud, Al-‘Iqnā’ Fī Halli Lafzi Abī Shujā’, (Dār Al-Kutub Al-‘Ilmiyah, 2004)
Muhammad Fārūq An-Nubhān, Mabāhith Fi Tashrī’ Al-Jinā’i Al-Islāmī Al-Qatlu Az-Zinā As-Sariqah, (Mu’assasah Al-Kutub Ath-Thaqāfīyah, 2016)
Muhammad Hamīd Al-Fiqī, Al-Insāf Fī Ma’rifah Ar-Rājih Minal-Khilāf ‘Alā Mazhab Al-Imām Ahmad Bin Hambal ‘Ali Bin Sulaimān Al-Mardawī Abū Al-Hasan, (Beirūt: Dār ‘Ihyā’ At-Turāth)
Sālih Abdul As-Sami’ Al-Abī Al-Azhariy, Ath=Thamar Ad-Dāniy Fī Taqrib Al-Ma’ānī Sharh Risālah Ibn Abī Zaid Al-Qairawanī, (Beirūt: Al-Maktabah Ath-Thaqāfīah)
Sulaiman Binal-Ashghath Bin Ishāk Bin Bashīr Bin Shadād Bin ‘Amru Al-Azdī As-Sajistānī, Tahqīq Muhammad Mahyuddīn Abdul Hamīd, Sunan Abī Dawūd, (Sida: Al-Maktabah Al-‘Asriyyah)
Taqyuddin Abī Bakar Bin Muhammad Al-Husainī Al-Husainī Ad-Dimashqī Ash-Shāfi’ī, Tahqīq ‘Alī Abdul Hamīd Baltajī, Muhammad Wahbī Sulaiman, Kifāyah Al-Akhyār Fī Hulli Ghāyah Al-Ikhtisār, (Damshiq: Dār Al-Khayr, 1994)
Yahyā Bin Sharaf Bin Marī Bin Hasan Al-Hizāmī Al-Hawrānī An-Nawawī Ash-Shāfi’ī Abu Zakariā Mahyuddīn, Tahqīq Muhammad Najīb Al-Muti’ī, Al-Majmū’ Sharh Al-Mazhab Lil Shīrāzī, (Maktabah Al-Irshād)
