Exploring MOOC Acceptance and Readiness among Postgraduate Students at a Higher Learning Institution

Authors

  • Mukaramatu Tahiru IIUM
  • Rosemaliza Kamaludeen IIUM

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31436/ijes.v6i1.203

Abstract

The pattern of learning in recent years have been impacted by the rise of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). The impact of MOOCs on the field of education have been investigated by many researches. MOOCs, since their inception have attracted a considerable amount of attention within higher education. This study therefore examines the extent of IIUM postgraduate students’ awareness knowledge of MOOCs, how-to knowledge of MOOCs, actual usage of MOOCs, perceived usefulness of MOOCs, attitude towards MOOCs and intention to use MOOCs for academic purposes. The research question concentrated on the extent of the students’ awareness knowledge, how-to knowledge, perceived usefulness, attitude, actual usage, and intention to use MOOCs for academic purposes. One hundred and ninety respondents were involved in this study. The analysis procedure made use of descriptive statistics to find the percentages, frequencies, mean and standard deviation of data. The findings reveal that majority of the respondents do not have awareness knowledge and how-to knowledge of MOOCs. It also shows very few respondents have actual usage of MOOCs. However, majority of the respondents have positive attitude towards MOOCs and majority of them show their intentions to use MOOCs for academic purposes. The study reveals a vital implication on how IIUM ought to scheme policies to increase adequate awareness of MOOCs and more importantly its usefulness to students.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Rosemaliza Kamaludeen, IIUM

Assistant Professor

Department of Curriculum and Instruction

IIUM

Downloads

Published

2019-07-02

How to Cite

Tahiru, M., & Kamaludeen, R. (2019). Exploring MOOC Acceptance and Readiness among Postgraduate Students at a Higher Learning Institution . IIUM Journal of Educational Studies, 6(1), 69–81. https://doi.org/10.31436/ijes.v6i1.203