CIVIL FORFEITURE UNDER ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING LEGISLATION IN MALAYSIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31436/iiumlj.v31iS1.876Keywords:
AMLAFTA, Civil Forfeiture, Malaysia, Money Laundering, Unlawful Activities, Criminal ForfeitureAbstract
The Anti-Money Laundering, Anti-Terrorism Financing and Proceeds of Unlawful Activities Act 2001 [AMLAFTA] empowers the Malaysian Courts to forfeit any property that is the subject of a money-laundering offence via sections 55 and 56 of the AMLAFTA. The rationale of this empowerment is to ensure that all property used in the commission of a money laundering offence is forfeited. Hence, the criminals do not gain any benefits from their crimes. However, it is observed that the provision related to civil forfeiture, specifically under section 56 of the AMLAFTA appears problematic in many instances due to the requirement attached and the civil standard of proof. As such, this article intends to detail the civil forfeiture mechanisms under the AMLAFTA. This article used the qualitative method in doctrinal legal research to collect and analyse all the information related to the topic from various primary and secondary data such as legal provisions, case laws and secondary sources, namely journals and articles on civil forfeiture, especially when applying the standard of proof. The article analyses the substantive law and procedural requirements for civil forfeitures based on Malaysia’s relevant legal provisions and cases. This article also examines the Malaysian Courts’ trends in deciding civil forfeiture cases and analyses the standard of proof for civil forfeiture. This article suggests amendments to section 56 of the AMLAFTA to introduce a provision on the rebuttable presumption to ensure that the objective of creating the civil forfeiture provision can be achieved.
Metrics
References
Abdullah, Hisyam @ Teh Poh Teik, The Law on Money Laundering (Johor Bharu: Hisyam Abdullah @ Teh Poh Teik, 2020), 84.
Abdul-Qadir Zubair, Aishat, Umar Aimhanosi Oseni, and Norhashimah Mohd. Yasin, “Anti-Terrorism Financing Laws In Malaysia: Current Trends And Developments,” IIUM Law Journal 23, no. 1 (2015): 151, https://doi.org/10.31436/iiumlj.v23i1.163.
Ali, Zuraidah. “Mareva Injunction as a Preventive Relief: The Malaysian Experience,” IIUM Law Journal 17, no. 2 (2012): 225-245. https://doi.org/10.31436/iiumlj.v17i2.37.
Bell, R.E. “Abolishing the Concept of Predicate Offence,” Journal of Money Laundering Control 6, no. 2 (2002):
Black’s Law Dictionary.
Dhillon, Guru., Rusniah Aspalela Rahman and Ng Yih Miin, “The Viability of Enforcement Mechanisms under Money Laundering and Anti‐Terrorism Offences in Malaysia: An Overview,” Journal of Money Laundering Control 16, no. 2 (2013): 183, https://doi.org/10.1108/13685201311318511.
Dobinson, Ian and Johns, Francis. “Qualitative Legal Research,” in Research Methods for Law, ed. Michael McConville and Wing Hong Chui (Edinburgh University Press, 2017), 18-19.
Garner, Bryan A. and Henry Campbell Black, ed., Black’s Law Dictionary, 7th ed. (St. Paul: West Group, 1999).
Hamilton, Booz Allen. “Comparative Evaluation of Unexplained Wealth Orders,” U.S. Department of Justice, Appendix A-5., last modified October 21, 2011, https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/comparative-evaluation-unexplained-wealth-orders.
Hamin, Zaiton, Normah Omar, and Muhammad Muaz Abdul Hakim, “When Property is the Criminal: Confiscating Proceeds of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing in Malaysia,” Procedia Economics and Finance 31 (2015: 789-796, https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01168-5
Hamin, Zaiton, Normawati Hashim, and Muhammad Muaz Abdul Hakim, “The Ramifications of Forfeiting Property in Money Laundering Cases: Some Evidence from Malaysia,” Pertanika J Soc Sci & Hum 25 (2017): 71-80.
Jasmi, Kamarul Azmi. “Metodologi Pengumpulan Data dalam Penyelidikan Kualitatitif,” in Kursus Penyelidikan Kualitatif Siri 1 2012, Institut Pendidikan Guru Malaysia Kampus Temenggong Ibrahim, 28-29 Mac 2012.
Kennedy, Anthony. “An Evaluation of the Recovery of Criminal Proceeds in the United Kingdom,” Journal of Money Laundering Control 10, no. 1 (2007): 37, https://doi.org/10.1108/13685200710721854
Korejo, Muhammad Saleem, Ramalinggam Rajamanickam and Muhamad Helmi Md. Said, “Financial Institutions and Anti-Money Laundering Violations: Who is to Bear the Burden of Liability?” Journal of Money Laundering Control 23, no. 3 (2021) 671-680, https://doi.org/10.1108/JMLC-07-2021-0071.
Lim, Koon Huan and Siew, Ka Yan, ”Recent Cases on Civil Forfeiture of Property under Malaysia’s Anti-Money Laundering Law,” SKRINE, last modified July 1, 2021, https://www.skrine.com/insights/alerts/july-2021/recent-cases-on-civil-forfeiture-of-property-under.
Mehanathan, M.C. Law on Prevention of Money Laundering in India, 2nd ed. (Haryana: LexisNexis, 2017).
Millington, Trevor and Williams, Mark Sutherland. The Proceeds of Crime, 3rd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).
Mohd Yasin, Norhashimah and Zul Kepli, Mohd Yazid. Anti-Money Laundering & Counter Financing of Terrorism Law in Malaysia (Singapore, Malaysia, Hong Kong & India: LexisNexis, 2018), 169-170.
Mohd Yasin, Norhashimah and Zul Kepli, Mohd Yazid. Anti-Money Laundering and Counter Financing of Terrorism Law in Malaysia (Petaling Jaya: LexisNexis, 2018), 163.
Mohd Zahir, Mohd Zamre, Tengku Noor Azira Tengku Zainudin, Ramalinggam Rajamanickam and Ahmad Azam Mohd Shariff. “Prospect and Legal Challenges of Medical Tourism in Relation to the Advance Medical Directive (AMD) in Malaysia,” Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (JSSH) 29, Special Issue 2 (2021): 17-28, https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.29.s2.02.
Muhammaddun Mohamed, Zakiah and Khalijah Ahmad “Investigation and Prosecution of Money Laundering Cases in Malaysia,” Journal of Money Laundering Control 15, no. 4 (2012): 421- 429, https://doi.org/10.1108/13685201211266006.
Nasir, Maruf Adeniyi. “Compatibility of Islamic Finance and Anti-Money Laundering Laws: A Myth or Reality?” IIUM Law Journal 26, no. 1 (2018): 55, https://doi.org/10.31436/iiumlj.v26i1.344.
Paris, Marie-Luce. “The Comparative Method in Legal Research: The Art of Justifying Choices,” in Legal Research Methods: Principles and Practicalities, ed. Laura Cahillane and Jennifer Schweppe (Dublin, Clarus Press, 2016), 8.
Patton, Michael Quinn. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods, 3rd ed. (London: Sage Publications, 2002); Michael Quinn Patton, Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods, 2nd ed. (Newbury Park: Sage Publications, 1990; Tim May, Social Research: Issues, Methods and Practices, 2nd ed. (Buckingham: Open University Press, 2001); Keith Punch, Introduction to Social Research (London: Sage Publications Ltd, 1998).
S.N. Jain., “Doctrinal and Non-Doctrinal Legal Research,” in Legal Research And Methodology (Indian Law Institute, 1982) 68.
Tengku Zainudin, Tengku Noor Azira, Mohd Zamre Mohd Zahir, Ramalinggam Rajamanickam and Ahmad Azam Mohd Shariff. “Legal Exploration of Right to Health,” Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (JSSH) 29, Special Issue 2 (2021): 221-232, https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.29.s2.15.
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime and the protocols thereto (New York: United Nations, 2004).
“What is Money Laundering?” Bank Negara Malaysia, accessed May 22, 2023, https://amlcft.bnm.gov.my/what-is-money-laundering.
Webley, Lisa. “Qualitative Approaches to Empirical Legal Research,” in The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research, ed. Peter Cane and Herbert M. Kritzer (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), 926–950, https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199542475.013.0039.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
© Copyright 1993-2024 IIUM Press
The IIUM Law Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
- Consent to publish: The Author(s) undertakes that the article named above is original and consents that the IIUM Press publishes it.
- Previous publication: The Author(s) guarantees that the article named above has not been published before in any form, that it is not concurrently submitted to another publication, and that it does not infringe anyone’s copyright. The Author(s) holds the IIUM Press and Editors of IIUM Law Journal harmless against all copyright claims.
- Transfer of copyright: The Author(s) hereby transfers the copyright of the article to the IIUM Press, which shall have the exclusive and unlimited right to publish the article in any form, including on electronic media. The Journal in turn grants the Author(s) the right to reproduce the article for educational and scientific purposes, provided the written consent of the Publisher is obtained.
