Feasibility and Acceptance of Decision-Based Games for the Assessment of Anxiety and Depression
Keywords:
Decision-based games, Mental health screening, GAD-7, PHQ-9, University students, Gamification in healthcareAbstract
Traditional mental health assessments for anxiety and depression often face limitations due to their overtly clinical nature and susceptibility to self-report and social desirability biases. To overcome these barriers, this preliminary study explores the feasibility and user acceptance of decision-based games as immersive, early-screening tools specifically targeting university students. Employing a qualitative descriptive design, the research integrated a multimedia production methodology with semi-structured interviews and user acceptance testing (UAT) involving clinical psychologists, academic experts, and student volunteers. The findings indicate that decision-based games can successfully and practically integrate standard psychometric tools, such as the GAD-7 and PHQ-9, yielding high user acceptance. However, experts stressed that to maintain psychological safety and clinical validity, these games must be strictly classified as preliminary screening tools rather than diagnostic instruments, and they must retain the exact original wording of the assessments. Furthermore, targeted design mechanics, including culturally resonant scenarios, minimalist anxiety-sensitive visuals, and brief 5- to 10-minute gameplay sessions, significantly enhance user engagement. Ultimately, well-designed decision-based games offer a viable, engaging, and less stigmatizing alternative to traditional questionnaires for routine mental health screening.
References
K. Aneni, I. Gomati de la Vega, M. G. Jiao, M. C. Funaro, and L. E. Fiellin, “Evaluating the validity of game-based assessments measuring cognitive function among children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis,” Progress in Brain Research, pp. 1–36, 2023, doi: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2023.02.002.
F. Leutner, S.-C. Codreanu, S. Brink, and T. Bitsakis, “Game-based assessments of cognitive ability in recruitment: Validity, fairness and test-taking experience,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 13, 2023, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.942662.
C. Townsend, C. Humpston, J. Rogers, V. Goodyear, A. Lavis, and M. Michail, “The effectiveness of gaming interventions for depression and anxiety in young people: Systematic review and meta-analysis,” BJPsych Open, vol. 8, no. 1, Art. no. e25, 2022, doi: 10.1192/bjo.2021.1078.
O. A. David and C. Tomoiag?, “Game-based assessment of emotion regulation abilities in college students: A usability study of the REThink Life Game Assessment System,” International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, pp. 1–8, 2025, doi: 10.1080/10447318.2025.2462749.
A. J. Williams et al., “Feasibility, perceived impact, and acceptability of a socially assistive robot to support emotion regulation with highly anxious university students: Mixed methods open trial,” JMIR Mental Health, vol. 10, Art. no. e46826, 2023, doi: 10.2196/46826.
S. Weller, P. A. Schroeder, and C. Plewnia, “Gamification improves antidepressant effects of cognitive control training—A pilot trial,” Frontiers in Digital Health, vol. 4, 2022, doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.994484.
E. Usta and M. Inozu, “The use of serious games in psychological interventions for anxiety disorders and related psychopathologies: A systematic review,” Current Psychology, vol. 43, pp. 12610–12633, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s12144-023-05318-1.
B. Yin and Y. Shen, “Compensatory beliefs in the internet gratification behavior: A study of game-based assessment,” Frontiers in Public Health, vol. 11, 2023, doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.997108.
V. Chitale, N. Baghaei, D. Playne, H. N. Liang, Y. Zhao, A. Erensoy, and Y. Ahmad, “The use of videogames and virtual reality for the assessment of anxiety and depression: A scoping review,” Games for Health Journal, advance online publication, 2022, doi: 10.1089/g4h.2021.0227.
N. A. Martin-Key, B. Spadaro, E. Funnell, E. J. Barker, T. S. Schei, J. Tomasik, and S. Bahn, “The current state and validity of digital assessment tools for psychiatry: Systematic review,” JMIR Mental Health, vol. 9, no. 3, Art. no. e32824, 2022, doi: 10.2196/32824.
M. Ruiz et al., “Winning the game against depression: A systematic review of video games for the treatment of depressive disorders,” Current Psychiatry Reports, vol. 24, pp. 23–35, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s11920-022-01314-7.
T. Tong, M. Chignell, M. C. Tierney, and J. Lee, “A serious game for clinical assessment of cognitive status: Validation study,” JMIR Serious Games, vol. 4, no. 1, Art. no. e7, 2016, doi: 10.2196/games.5006.
G. Spies, J. Huss, O. Motswage, S. Seedat, and C. Eichenberg, “Attitudes of patients and mental health professionals towards hypothetical use of serious games in psychotherapy,” Health Informatics Journal, vol. 30, no. 2, Art. no. 14604582241259343, 2024, doi: 10.1177/14604582241259343.
L. Lukka, V. M. Karhulahti, and J. M. Palva, “Mental health professionals’ views on gaming to inform game-based interventions: Qualitative cross-sectional study,” JMIR Serious Games, vol. 14, no. 1, Art. no. e69236, 2026.
R. Tark, M. Metelitsa, K. Akkermann, K. Saks, S. Mikkel, and K. Haljas, “Usability, acceptability, feasibility, and effectiveness of a gamified mobile health intervention (Triumf) for pediatric patients: Qualitative study,” JMIR Serious Games, vol. 7, no. 3, Art. no. e13776, 2019, doi: 10.2196/13776.
C. Eichenberg, G. Grabmayer, and N. Green, “Acceptance of serious games in psychotherapy: An inquiry into the stance of therapists and patients,” Telemedicine and e-Health, vol. 22, no. 11, pp. 945–951, 2016, doi: 10.1089/tmj.2016.0001.
T. C. Gordon, A. H. Kemp, and D. J. Edwards, “Mixed-methods feasibility outcomes for a novel ACT-based video game ‘ACTing Minds’ to support mental health,” BMJ Open, vol. 14, no. 3, Art. no. e080972, 2024, doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080972.
University of Southern California, “Organizing your research paper methodology,” USC Libraries, Jul. 27, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://libguides.usc.edu/writingguide/methodology
R. Garg, “Methodology for research I,” Indian Journal of Anaesthesia, vol. 60, no. 9, pp. 640–645, 2016, doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.190619
