ANALYSING SUKUK DEFAULT CASES: CAUSES, REMEDIES AND REGULATORY IMPLICATIONS
Keywords:
Sukuk Default Causes, Remedies, Governance Deficiencies, Regulatory Framework, Risk ManagementAbstract
The growing significance of Sukuk as a Shariah-compliant financial instrument has been accompanied by a rise in default cases, highlighting critical financial, legal, and governance vulnerabilities. This article examines the principal causes of Sukuk defaults, including inefficient liquidity management, regulatory inconsistencies, and governance deficiencies, as evidenced in the cases of Menara ABS Berhad, MEX II Sdn Bhd, and Serba Dinamik Holdings Berhad. Distinguishing between asset-backed and asset-based Sukuk is crucial for understanding investor risk exposure, especially in relation to ownership rights and bankruptcy protections. Legal uncertainties, jurisdictional conflicts, and ineffective enforcement measures exacerbate challenges in resolving defaults. This study employs a qualitative methodology, combining doctrinal and empirical analyses to explore regulatory deficiencies and suggest reforms. The findings emphasise the need for stronger governance, harmonised legal frameworks, and proactive risk management strategies to strengthen the Sukuk market against default risks, thereby ensuring its sustainability within the global Islamic finance ecosystem.
Metrics
References
Abdullah, Ziarmal, and Muchtim Humaidi. “Advancing Sukuk Markets: Legal Frameworks, Regulatory Developments, and Default Challenges in Malaysia and the United Arab Emirates.” Etihad: Journal of Islamic Banking and Finance 5, no. 1 (Jan.–June 2025): 45–57. https://jurnal.iainponorogo.ac.id/index.php/etihad.
Adisa, Mohammed Kabir. Sukuk Default/Near Default and Governance Failure: The Need for a Strong and Sound Governance Framework (The Role of Securities Commissions and Other Regulatory Authorities). Executive Master’s project paper, INCEIF University, 2022. INCEIF Knowledge Repository.
Al Sanea v. Saad Investments Company Ltd. High Court of Justice, England and Wales. [2012] EWHC 2748 (Ch). October 12, 2012.
Al-Ali, Salim. Raising Capital on Ṣukūk Markets: Structural, Legal and Regulatory Issues. Springer, 2019. 1–255.
Alhammadi, Salah, Simon Archer, and Dalal Aloumi. “Sukuk Structure and Risk Exposures: Evidence from an Originator Perspective.” Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research 15, no. 4 (2024): 1–15.
Ali, Mohammed Imad, Aznan Hasan, and Ashurov Sharofiddin. “Evaluating Sukuk Default Factors: A Case Study on Dana Gas Sukuk in the UAE.” Journal of Islamic Finance 11, no. 1 (2022): 33–40.
Ali, Salman Syed. “Ṣukūk Default and Issues in Their Resolution: The Case of Villamar Ṣukūk.” In Developments in Islamic Finance, edited by S.A.R. Rizvi and I. Saba, 65–88. Palgrave CIBFR Studies in Islamic Finance. 2017.
Alim, Arjun Neil, John Reed, and Joseph Cotterill. “Maldives Hunts for Bailout to Avoid First Islamic Sovereign Debt Default.” Financial Times, September 11, 2024. https://www.ft.com/content/595863b5-7fdc-43de-9e13-224bbf6320e0.
Alyamani, Ghalib Mohammed, Aisyah Abdul Rahman, Syajarul Imna Mohd Amin, and Mohd Hafizuddin Syah Bangaan Abdullah. “The Effect of Institutional and Shariah Governance on Sukuk and Bond Performance in the Asian Region.” Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental 18, no. 5 (2024): 1–26.
Aziz, Adam. “Serba Dinamik Sees Significant Financial Impact from US$222M Sukuk Default.” The Edge Malaysia, December 15, 2021. https://theedgemalaysia.com/article/serba-dinamik-sees-significant-financial-impact-us222m-Sukuk-default.
Bank Islam Malaysia Berhad v. TMF Trustees Malaysia Berhad & Ors, 2019 MLJU 1380 (High Ct. Kuala Lumpur).
Berrahlia, Badreddine, and Mourad Benseghir. 2025. “Limits of Legal Certainty: A Commentary on the ‘Dana Gas’ Case.” Laws 14, no. 2: 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws14020022.
Busari, Saheed Abdullahi, Akhtarzaite AbdulAziz, Luqman Zakariyah, and Muhammad Amanullah. “Dana Gas Sukuk Default: A Juristic Analysis of Court Judgement.” International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management 12, no. 4 (2019): 569–85.
Byers v. Saudi National Bank. Supreme Court of the United Kingdom. [2023] UKSC 51. December 20, 2023.
CIMB Bank Berhad v. Maybank Trustees Berhad & Other Appeals, Federal Court (Malaysia), 10 February 2014. [2014] CLJ JT (3) (Malays.). https://www.cljlaw.com/others/files
Dana Gas PJSC v. Dana Gas Sukuk Ltd & Ors., High Court of Justice, England and Wales, [2017] EWHC 1896 (Comm), June 16, 2017.
Davis, Kurt. “$1tn Sukuk Market at Risk of Unintended Disruption.” Financial Times, May 29, 2025. https://www.ft.com/content/
Ercanbrack, Jonathan. The Standardization of Islamic Financial Law: Lawmaking in Modern Financial Markets. The American Journal of Comparative Law 67, no. 4 (2020): 825–848. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcl/avz010.
Fitch Ratings. “Global Outstanding Sukuk Market Reaches $823.4 Billion in Q3 2023.” December 13, 2023. https://www.wam.ae/en/article/aq9kls6-global-outstanding-sukuk-market-surged-823-billion.
Fitch Ratings. Guide to Islamic Finance: Fitch Ratings' Perspective. Credit Encyclopedia Series. Fitch Ratings, 2020. https://www.fitchratings.com/research/islamic-finance/guide-to-islamic-finance-fitch-ratings-perspective.
Herzi, Ahmed Abdirahman. “A Comparative Study of Asset-Based and Asset-Backed Sukuk from the Shariah Compliance Perspective.” Journal of Muamalat and Islamic Finance Research 13, no. 1 (2016): 25–34.
IMARC Group. Sukuk Market Size, Share, Trends and Forecast by Sukuk Type, Currency, Issuer Type, and Region, 2025-2033. Report ID: SR112025A2263. https://www.imarcgroup.com/sukuk-market.
MARC. “MEX II Ratings Downgraded to D.” MARC, January 7, 2022. https://www.marc.com.my/rating-announcements/mex-ii-ratings-downgraded-to-d/.
Mohamed, Ghezal, Rusni Hassan, and Ahcene Lahsasna. “Legal and Regulatory Approaches in Ṣukūk Issuance: A Comparative Analysis.” UUM Journal of Legal Studies 13, no. 1 (2022): 249–81.
Mohd Roslen, Siti Nurhidayah, Mei-Shan Chua, and Rafiatul Adlin Hj Mohd Ruslan. “Long-Run Asymmetric Effects of Financial Risks on Sukuk Market Development: Empirical Evidence from Malaysia.” Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research 15, no. 1 (2024): 1–32.
Nazar, Jhordy Kashoogie. “Regulatory and Financial Implications of Sukuk’s Legal Challenges for Sustainable Sukuk Development in Islamic Capital Market.” In Ethics, Governance and Regulation in Islamic Finance, edited by Hatem A. El-Karanshawy et al., 135–143.
Doha, Qatar: Bloomsbury Qatar Foundation, 2015.
Rehman, Awais Ur, Muhammad Abdullah bin Zaidel, Mohamad bin Jais, and Arslan Haneef Malik. “Sukuk Default: Could Corporate Governance & Sustainability Be the Defenders?” International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences 10, no. 5 (2020): 533-545. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v10-i5/7226.
Ries Ahmed, Essia, Ramyar Rzgar Ahmed, Fathyah Hashim, and Md. Aminul Islam. “Asset-Based and Asset-Backed Sukuk: Structure and Legitimacy.” Opción 35, no. Especial No. 21 (2019): 1248-1262. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/
pdf.
Serba Dinamik Holdings Berhad. “Default in Interest Payment Pursuant to Paragraph 9.19A of the Main Market Listing Requirements of Bursa Malaysia Securities Berhad.” Company Announcement, December 15, 2021.
Swandaru, Randi, and Aishath Muneeza. “Causes for Near Default Sukuk Cases in the 21st Century and Their Rescue Mechanisms.” JIHBIZ: Journal of Islamic Economy, Finance, and Banking 8, no. 1 (2024): 1–13.
Tasnia, Mashiyat, Is’haq Muhammad Mustapha, and Mohammad Hassan Shakil. “Critical Assessment of the Legal Recourse for the Case of Sukuk Default for the Asset-Backed Sukuk and Asset-Based Sukuk Structures.” European Journal of Islamic Finance 7 (2017): 1–6.
Ulusoy, Ahmet, and Mehmet Ela. “Lack of Standardization in Sukuk Market.” Journal of Islamic Economics, Banking and Finance 13, no. 1 (2017): 148-160. https://doi.org/10.12816/0051160.
Zada, Najeeb, and Marjan Muhammad. “The Intricacies of Default in Islamic Finance: A Case Study of Dana Gas Sukuk Litigation.” Journal of Islamic Business and Management 8, no. S (2018): 286–292.
Zaheer, Sajjad, and Sweder van Wijnbergen. “Sukuk Defaults: On Distress Resolution in Islamic Finance.” Qualitative Research in Financial Markets 17, no. 2 (2025): 292–311.
Zainul, Intan Farhana. “Sale of Menara TM Stuck in Office Glut, As Are Sukuk Holders.” The Edge Malaysia, November 13, 2023. https://theedgemalaysia.com/node/688977.
Zakaria, Nor Balkish, Kazi Musa, Mohammad Rokibul Kabir, Farid A. Sobhani, and Muhammad Rasyid Abdillah. “The Impact of Geopolitical Risk and COVID-19 Pandemic Stringency on Sukuk Issuance in Malaysia.” Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research 15, no. 1 (2024): 1–16.
Zakariyah, Habeebullah, and Saheed Abdullahi Busari. “Analysis of Sukuk Cross-Default Clause: A Fiqh Perspective.” Journal of Islamic Finance 8, no. 2 (2019): 50–57.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
© Copyright 1993-2024 IIUM Press
The IIUM Law Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
- Consent to publish: The Author(s) undertakes that the article named above is original and consents that the IIUM Press publishes it.
- Previous publication: The Author(s) guarantees that the article named above has not been published before in any form, that it is not concurrently submitted to another publication, and that it does not infringe anyone’s copyright. The Author(s) holds the IIUM Press and Editors of IIUM Law Journal harmless against all copyright claims.
- Transfer of copyright: The Author(s) hereby transfers the copyright of the article to the IIUM Press, which shall have the exclusive and unlimited right to publish the article in any form, including on electronic media. The Journal in turn grants the Author(s) the right to reproduce the article for educational and scientific purposes, provided the written consent of the Publisher is obtained.
