Biopharmaceutical Innovation and Regulatory Harmonisation in Emerging Economies: A Comprehensive Analysis of Brazil, China, India, and South Africa

Main Article Content

Sandip Badadhe

Abstract

Introduction: Emerging economies are changing the playing?field of global biopharmaceutical innovation and international review mechanisms should be adjusted accordingly. However, heterogenous regulatory frameworks and innovation potential prevent sustainable global market?access with truly affordable health care. Analyses of biopharmaceutical innovation trajectories, regulatory environments and policy ecosystems in these four market-pairs can inform opportunities for improved?collaboration and patient access. Methods: We performed an in-depth analysis of the innovation pipelines and biopharmaceutical industries in Brazil, China, India,?and South Africa. Information was retrieved from?regulatory databases, company reports, clinical trial registries and peer-reviewed sources (2018-2024). We examined 376 drug candidates from 66 companies, analysing their innovation attributes, regulatory approval methods, and policy environments. Other information about trends in clinical trials, timelines?for regulatory approval and recent policy developments were abstracted in a systematic manner. Results and Discussion: Analysis showed 376 biopharmaceutical candidates in?development, about 60% of which were new chemical or molecular entities. China still had the highest?number of New Molecular Entity (NME) at 46 in 2024 and India's biopharmaceutical sector accounted for 49% of the country's total biopharmaceutical output. Regulatory timelines varied significantly—from 21 days under China’s pilot programme, to 10–14 months in Brazil, and up to approximately four years historically in South Africa. The gap in clinical research activity between BRICS and G7 countries decreased by 68.6% between 2018 and 2022. Challenges included limited resources, regulatory complexity, and low levels of harmonisation, while progress was driven by government support, attention to local health needs, and international collaboration. Conclusion: There is great potential in biopharmaceutical innovation in BRICS, but there is a requirement?for regulatory harmonisation to obtain global impact. Policy recommendations include risk-based assessments,?installation of reliance mechanisms, public-private partnerships and establishment of regional harmonisation platforms. These measures could accelerate the arrival of new treatments while maintaining safety standards and supporting the growth of a viable business environment

Article Details

How to Cite
Badadhe, S. (2026). Biopharmaceutical Innovation and Regulatory Harmonisation in Emerging Economies: A Comprehensive Analysis of Brazil, China, India, and South Africa . Journal of Pharmacy, 6(2), 165–175. https://doi.org/10.31436/jop.v6i2.452
Section
Pharmacy Practice & Education

References

Arlett, P., Umuhire, D., Verpillat, P., Foggi, P., Liminga, U., Sepodes, B., Lunzer, M., Aylward, B., Vamvakas, S., Roes, K. C. B., Pétavy, F., Thirstrup, S., Lamas, M. J., Cooke, E., & Broich, K. (2025). Clinical Evidence 2030. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 117(4), 884–886. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.3596

Artixio. (2025). Regulation of pharmaceuticals in Brazil by ANVISA.

Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency. (2024a). ANVISA regulatory framework. Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency.

Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency. (2024b). International harmonization initiatives.

BRICS Competition Centre. (2025). Reducing regulatory barriers is a global trend.

Cactus Communications. (2024). India’s biopharma sector emerges as key driver of the bioeconomy. Bio Spectrum India. https://cactusglobal.com/careers/press/biopharma-industry-in-india-report/

Central Drugs Standard Control Organisation. (2019). New Drugs and Clinical Trials Rules, 2019. Government of India.

Central Drugs Standard Control Organisation. (2024). Annual report 2023–24. Government of India.

Chaturvedi, S., & Thorsteinsdóttir, H. (2011). BRICS and South–South cooperation in medicine: Emerging trends in research and entrepreneurial collaborations. In RIS Discussion Paper (Issue 177). Research and Information System for Developing Countries.

China FDA Approval Monitor. (2024). Monthly report: New drug approvals in China (November 2024). Che Linked.

International Council for Harmonisation. (2024). ICH members and observers. https://www.ich.org/page/members-observers

Keyter, A., Banoo, S., Salek, S., & Walker, S. (2018). The South African Regulatory System: Past, Present, and Future. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 9, 1407–1407. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.01407

Manoharan, K., Jinson, J., Ramesh, K., & George, M. (2023). Clinical trial trends over the last 5 years among the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) nations. Perspectives in Clinical Research, 15(3), 128–133. https://doi.org/10.4103/picr.picr_179_23

Manoharan, V. R., Anoop, S., … Joseph, J. (2024). Clinical trial trends over the last 5 years among the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa): A systematic analysis. Perspectives in Clinical Research, 15(3), 123–132.

Moeti, L., Litedu, M., & Joubert, J. (2023). Regulatory registration timelines of generic medicines in South Africa: Assessment of the performance of SAHPRA between 2011 and 2022. Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice, 16(1), 34–34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40545-023-00537-0

National Medical Products Administration. (2024). Drug approvals 2024.

RegASK. (2024a). China NMPA introduces new review and approval process for drugs. RegASK.

RegASK. (2024b). China NMPA’s new drug review and approval process. https://regask.com/china-nmpa-drug-review-approval/

Rezaie, R., Frew, S. E., Sammut, S. M., Maliakkal, M. R., Daar, A. S., & Singer, P. (2008). Brazilian health biotech—fostering crosstalk between public and private sectors. Nature Biotechnology, 26(6), 627–644. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0608-627

Salter, B., Cooper, M., Dickins, A., & Cardo, V. (2007). Stem Cell Science in India: Emerging Economies and the Politics of Globalization. Regenerative Medicine, 2(1), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.2217/17460751.2.1.75

South African Health Products Regulatory Authority. (2024a). Good review practice guidelines.

South African Health Products Regulatory Authority. (2024b). SAHPRA strategic plan 2024–2029.

Thorsteinsdóttir, H., Quach, U., Stuck, A. S., & Mahmud, A. S. (2004). Health biotechnology innovation on the global fringe. Nature Biotechnology, 22.

Wu, X., Zhang, Y., & Li, M. (2025). New drugs approved by the NMPA in 2024. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 283, 116089.

Zhang, Y., Naci, H., Wagner, A. K., Xu, Z., Yang, Y., Zhu, J., Ji, J., Shi, L., & Guan, X. (2022). Overall Survival Benefits of Cancer Drugs Approved in China From 2005 to 2020. JAMA Network Open, 5(8). https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.25973