Perceptions and utilization of the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN) among final year dental students: a qualitative study

Chun Hown Ng; Wen Wu Tan; Albert Chek Hong Law; Shang Rong Ang; Hui Ying Beh; Wei Sheng Chan

doi:10.31436/ijohs.v7i2.448

Authors

Chun Hown Ng Faculty of Dentistry, AIMST University, Batu 3 1/2, Jalan, Bukit Air Nasi, 08100 Bedong, Kedah, Malaysia.
Wen Wu Tan Faculty of Dentistry, AIMST University, Batu 3 1/2, Jalan, Bukit Air Nasi, 08100 Bedong, Kedah, Malaysia.
Albert Chek Hong Law Faculty of Dentistry, AIMST University, Batu 3 1/2, Jalan, Bukit Air Nasi, 08100 Bedong, Kedah, Malaysia.
Shang Rong Ang Faculty of Dentistry, AIMST University, Batu 3 1/2, Jalan, Bukit Air Nasi, 08100 Bedong, Kedah, Malaysia.
Hui Ying Beh Faculty of Dentistry, AIMST University, Batu 3 1/2, Jalan, Bukit Air Nasi, 08100 Bedong, Kedah, Malaysia.
Wei Sheng Chan Faculty of Dentistry, AIMST University, Batu 3 1/2, Jalan, Bukit Air Nasi, 08100 Bedong, Kedah, Malaysia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31436/ijohs.v7i2.448

Keywords:

dental students, index, perception, utilization

Abstract

The Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN) is widely used to assess malocclusion severity and prioritize orthodontic treatment. However, its perception and utilization among undergraduate dental students remain unclear. This qualitative study aimed to explore the perceptions and utilization of the IOTN among 13 final-year dental students at AIMST University, Malaysia. Participants were recruited using convenience sampling, and data were collected through semi-structured interviews conducted via Zoom. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis until data saturation was achieved. Five main themes emerged: subjectivity in perception of criteria, neglect of patients’ psychological well-being, time-consuming application, lack of training and exposure, and potential facilitators for improvement. Although the participants acknowledged the IOTN as a valuable standardized tool, its consistent application in clinical practice was perceived to be limited by variability in interpretation and practical constraints. These findings highlight the need for improved undergraduate training, greater standardization, and the incorporation of digital technologies to enhance the reliability and clinical applicability of the IOTN. Strengthening these aspects may better prepare future dental practitioners for effective orthodontic assessment and treatment prioritization. Future research should consider multi-centre studies involving both public and private universities to improve generalisability and to better understand variations in training exposure, curriculum structure, and clinical experience across institutions.

References

Bentele, M.J., Vig, K.W., Shanker, S., Beck, F.M. (2002). Efficacy of training dental students in the index of orthodontic treatment need. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 122(5):456-462.

Bouskandar, S.Y., Al Muraikhi, L., Hodge, T.M., Barber, S.K. (2023). UK dental students' ability and confidence in applying the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need and determining appropriate orthodontic referral. European Journal of Dental Education, 27(3):489-496.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

Brook, P.H., Shaw, W.C. (1989). The development of an index of orthodontic treatment priority. European Journal of Orthodontics, 11(3):309-320.

Ferguson, J.W. (2006). IOTN (DHC): is it supported by evidence? Dental Update, 33(8):478-486.

Grzywacz, I. (2003). The value of the aesthetic component of the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need in the assessment of subjective orthodontic treatment need. European Journal of Orthodontics, 25(1):57-63.

Hsu, E.E.H., Myo, Y.Y., Yee, H.H., Win, S.S. (2014). A study of Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need and perception of personal dental appearance among dental students. Myanmar Dental Journal, 21(1),60-66.

Järvinen, S. (2001). Indexes for orthodontic treatment need. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 120(3):237-239.

Liu, J., Zhang, C., Shan, Z. (2023). Application of artificial intelligence in orthodontics: current state and future perspectives. Healthcare, 11(20):2760.

Loke, S.T. (2006). Training dental officers and nurses in the index of orthodontic treatment need (IOTN) as a screening tool in public health facilities. Malaysian Journal of Public Health Medicine, 6(2):49-55.

Loke, S.T., Tan, S.Y. (2017). Competency of primary care officers in referring patients for orthodontic treatment using IOTN (Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need). Malaysian Dental Journal, 2:1-31.

Murray, D.G., Sivamurthy, G., Mossey, P. (2023). Helping general dental practitioners use the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need: an assessment of available educational apps. British Dental Journal, 1-5.

Puri, A., Ho-A-Yun, J., McGuiness, N.J. (2015). Use and knowledge of IOTN among GDPs in Scotland. British Dental Journal, 218,399-404.

Salzmann, J.A. (1968). Handicapping malocclusion assessment to establish treatment priority. American Journal of Orthodontics, 54(10):749-765.

Shahrul, AI., Pauzzi, E.R., Abas, N.D.A., Yahya N.A., Khan, K.A.M., Nor, M.M. (2024). To assess the knowledge, awareness, and perception of non-dentists offering orthodontic treatment among the Malaysian young adult population. BMC Public Health, 24(1):3224.

Siddiqui, T.A., Shaikh, A., Fida, M. (2014). Agreement between orthodontist and patient perception using Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need. Saudi Dental Journal, 26(4):156-165.

Stetzel, L., Foucher, F., Jang, S.J., Wu, T. H., Fields, H., Schumacher, F., et al. (2024). Artificial Intelligence for predicting the aesthetic component of the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need. Bioengineering, 11(9):861.