Fracture resistance of direct composite and composite onlay on endo-treated upper premolar with MOD cavity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31436/ijohs.v6i1.316Keywords:
endodontically-treated teeth, direct composite restoration, direct composite onlay, fracture resistance, MOD cavityAbstract
Endodontically-treated teeth are weaker than vital teeth due to extensive missing sound tooth structure and the endodontic treatment. The restoration choice for an endodontic treatment tooth (ETT) determines the ETT’s survival. This study aims to investigate the fracture resistance and mode of direct composite restoration and direct composite onlay with cuspal coverage on endodontically-treated upper premolars with mesio-occluso-distal (MOD) cavity. Twenty sound upper premolars were collected from local dental clinics, mounted in cold-cure acrylic and stored in normal saline. Teeth were subjected to root canal treatment (RCT), followed by MOD cavity preparation. The teeth were randomly and equally divided into two groups (Groups A and B). Group A (n = 10) were restored with direct composite restoration, whereas Group B (n = 10) were prepared occlusally and restored with direct composite onlay restoration. All teeth were subjected to a compressive axial load test using a universal testing machine (Instron 3369, United State) with a metal ball sized 4 mm at 1mm/min of crosshead speed until a fracture occurred. The fracture mode was analysed under a stereomicroscope with 0.68 magnifications. A statistical analysis of fracture resistance and fracture mode was performed using a paired T-test. The mean fracture resistance value was 431.37 N for group A and 1158.34 N for group B, with a statistically significant difference (p< 0.05) between these two groups. Endodontically-treated upper premolar with MOD cavities restored with direct composite onlay restoration exhibited higher fracture resistance than direct composite restoration. In addition, the mode of fractures was not affected by the types of restoration.
References
Assif, D., Nissan, J., Gafni, Y., Gordon, M. (2003). Assessment of the resistance to fracture of endodontically treated molars restored with amalgam. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 89(5), 462-464. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(02)52748-7
Faria, A.C., Rodrigues, R.C., Antunes, R.P., Maria, D.G.C.D.M., Ribeiro, R.F. (2011). Endodontically treated teeth: Characteristics and considerations to restore them. Journal of Prosthodontic Research, 55(2), 69-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2010.07.003
Hansen, E.K. (1988) In vivo cusp fracture of endodontically treated premolars restored with MOD amalgam or MOD resin fillings. Dental materials: Academy of Dental Materials. U.S. National Library of Medicine. Retrieved 16 November 2019 from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3251803 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(88)80058-7
Heling, I., Gorfil, C., Slutzky, H., Kopolovic, K., Zalkind, M., Slutzky-Goldberg, I. (2002). Endodontic failure caused by inadequate restorative procedure: review and treatment recommendation. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 87(6), 674-678. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2002.124453
Hannig, C., Westphal, C., Becker, K., Attin, T. (2005). Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic inlays. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 94(4), 342-349. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.08.004
Ferro, K.J., Morgano, S.M., Driscoll, C.F., Freilich, M.A., Guckes, A.D., Knoernschild, K.L. et al. (2017). Glossary of Prosthodontics Terms Ninth Edition. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 117 (5s), e63.
Jiang, W., Bo, H., Yongchun, G., LongXing, N. (2010). Stress distribution in molars restored with inlays or onlays with or without endodontic treatment: A three-dimensional finite element analysis. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 103(1), 6-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60206-7
Koosha, S., Mostafavi, A. S., Jebelizadeh, M. S., Ghasemi, M., & Hayerimaybodi, M. (2022). Fracture Resistance and Failure Mode of Endocrown Restorations with Different Remaining Walls and Finish Lines. In S. Koosha, A. S. Mostafavi, M. S. Jebelizadeh, M. Ghasemi, & M. Hayerimaybodi, The Open Dentistry Journal (Vol. 17, Issue 1). Bentham Science Publishers. https://doi.org/10.2174/18742106-v16-e221227-2022-49 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2174/18742106-v16-e221227-2022-49
Slutzky-Goldberg, I., Slutzky, H., Gorfil, C., Smidt, A. (2009). Restoration of endodontically treated teeth review and treatment recommendation. International Journal of Dentistry, 2009(1), 150251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/150251
Salameh, Z., Ounsi, H.F., Aboushelib, M.N., Al-Hamdan, R., Sadig, W., Ferrari, M. (2010). Effect of different onlay systems on fracture resistance and failure pattern of endodontically treated mandibular molars restored with and without glass fibre posts. American Journal of Dentistry, 23(2), 81-85.
Alshiddi, I.F., Aljinbaz, A. (2016). Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with indirect composite inlay and onlay restoration- An in vitro study. Saudi Dental Journal, 28, 49-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2015.09.001
Burke, F.J.T., Wilson, N.H.F., Watts, D.C. (1993). The effect of cuspal coverage of the fracture resistance of teeth restored with in Quintessence International, 24, 875-880.
Montoya, C., Arango-Santander, S., Peláez-Vargas, A., Arola, D., Ossa, E.A. (2015). Effect of aging on the microstructure of dentin. Archives of Oral Biology, 60(12), 1811-1820. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2015.10.002
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
