THE CONVENTIONAL RESTRICTIVE AND THE MODERN LIBERAL INTERPRETATION OF SECTION 30 OF THE EVIDENCE ACT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31436/iiumlj.v21i1.97Keywords:
Confession, Section 30 Evidence Act, strict interpretation, liberal interpretation.Abstract
Section 30 of the Evidence Act allows the confession of an accused to be admitted against the co-accused. However, since it is a radical and dangerous departure from the rule that hearsay should not be admitted, the Indian and Malaysian Courts have not recognized such confession as falling within the definition of ‘evidence’. It can only be used as a last resort and hence has been strictly construed throughout. But Singaporean Courts have now given it a liberal construction and elevated it to the status of a rule of evidence. The researcher’s view is that this is dangerous and our courts should be wary of following Singaporean Courts’ judicial thinking.
Metrics
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
- Consent to publish: The Author(s) undertakes that the article named above is original and consents that the IIUM Press publishes it.
- Previous publication: The Author(s) guarantees that the article named above has not been published before in any form, that it is not concurrently submitted to another publication, and that it does not infringe anyone’s copyright. The Author(s) holds the IIUM Press and Editors of IIUM Law Journal harmless against all copyright claims.
- Transfer of copyright: The Author(s) hereby transfers the copyright of the article to the IIUM Press, which shall have the exclusive and unlimited right to publish the article in any form, including on electronic media. The Journal in turn grants the Author(s) the right to reproduce the article for educational and scientific purposes, provided the written consent of the Publisher is obtained.