ELECTION DISPUTES: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE JUDICIAL REVIEW PROCESS IN MALAYSIA AND INDONESIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31436/iiumlj.v32i2.946Keywords:
Functional Approach, Micro-comparison, Election Disputes, Judicial Reviews, Legal SystemAbstract
This paper uses Zweigert and Kötz’ classical functional approach in comparative law to compare judicial reviews relating to election disputes in Malaysia and Indonesia. It is seen here that even though Malaysia and Indonesia have similarities in their intent to settle election disputes and apply the method of judicial review to act as a means of check-and-balance, the judiciary in both systems has shown themselves rather unwilling in directly addressing the legality of these election petitions. There are variations in court structure and legal regulations governing the systems in Malaysia and Indonesia. Malaysia’s Election Court often dismisses cases based on technicalities, while Indonesia’s Constitutional Court adopts a wider approach, incorporating cultural norms and indigenous rules. Additionally, Malaysia’s judicial system benefits from a more mature application of judicial review, grounded in its common law practice and a robust body of case law. By employing a micro-comparison method, this paper enhances understanding of the socio-political and legal contexts that influence the handling of election disputes in both countries. It also demonstrates the importance of considering the distinct legal structures, political influences, and historical legacies that define the electoral systems in Malaysia and Indonesia. The classical functional approach involving micro-comparison is best suited for the current study due to the particular problem of election disputes forming its focus. This paper aims at enhancing the understanding and knowledge regarding the social, cultural, historical, and other factors that influence the legal systems in both countries.
Metrics
References
Abdul Hakim Abdul Wahid v. Mas Ermieyati Samsudin & Another Appeal [2023] 5 MLRA 34 (FC).
Della-Giacoma, Jim, and Veri Junaidi. "Prabowo’s Weak Suit." New Mandala. August 14, 2014. https://www.newmandala.org/prabowos-weak-suit/.
Devan Nair v Yong Kuan Teik [1967] 1 MLJ 261
Dr Shafie bin Abu Bakar v Pegawai Pengurus Pilihan Raya. No 26 Bangi - Mohd Zakri bin Hj Hussin & others [2005] 2 MLJ 149
Elections Act 1958 (Revised 1970) (Act 19), https://www.spr.gov.my/sites/default/files/perundangan/akta-19-cetakan-semula.pdf.
Election Commission Act 1957 (Revised 1970) (Act 31), https://www.spr.gov.my/sites/default/files/perundangan/akta-31-cetakan-semula-2016.pdf.
Election Offences Act 1954 (Act 5) https://www.spr.gov.my/sites/default/files/perundangan/akta-5-cetakan-semula-2016.pdf.
G. Manivannan a/l Gowindasamy v. Khairuddin bin Tarmizi & Ors [2018] MLJU 1425
Harris Mohd Salleh v. Ismail bin Majin, Returning Officer & Ors and Anor Application [2000] 3 MLJ 434
Hendrianto, Stefanus. “Judicial Review of Electoral Process in Indonesia.” In Judicial Review of Elections in Asia, edited by Po Jen Yap, 98. New York: Routledge, 2016.
Hendrianto, Stefanus. “The Rise and Fall of Historic Chief Justices: Constitutional Politics and Judicial Leadership in Indonesia.” Washington International Law Journal no. 3 (2016): 489. https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/wilj/vol25/iss3/5.
Husa, Jaakko. “The Traditional Methods of Comparative Law.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Comparative Law, edited by Matthias Siems and Po Jen Yap, 15-31. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108914741.004.
"Indonesian Constitutional Politics." Iconnectblog. Accessed October 2, 2021. http://www.iconnectblog.com/2013/10/indonesian-constitutional-politics/.
Ishak Hamid v. Mustapha [1965] 2 MLJ 18
Karmini, Niniek, and Fadlan Syam. "Indonesia’s Top Court Begins Hearing Election Appeals of 2 Losing Candidates Alleging Fraud."
Washington Post, March 27, 2024. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2024/03/27/indonesia-election-fraud-appeal-baswedan-subianto-pranowo/a69bf028-ebf5-11ee-8f2c-380a821c02db_story.html.
Khairuddin Abu Hassan v. Datuk Seri Haji Ahmad Hamzah & Ors [2019] 5 MLRA 459
Kelliher, Camden, Saldi Isra, Yuliandi, Zainul Daulay, Hilaire Tegnan, and Feri Amsari. “Unconstitutional Authority of Indonesia’s Constitutional Court: The Resolution of Pilkada Result Disputes.” Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy (September 2019): 297–308. http://doi.org/10.1089/elj.2018.0535.
Kötz, Hein, and Konrad Zweigert. An Introduction to Comparative Law. Translated by Tony Weir. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.
Lamb, Kate. "Indonesian Court Rejects Appeal Against Election Result." The Guardian, June 27, 2019. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/jun/27/indonesian-court-rejects-appeal-against-election-result.
Lamb, Kate, and Fransiska Nangoy. "Indonesia Presidential Candidate Anies Seeks Election Re-Run as Losers Decry ‘Meddling’."
Reuters, March 21, 2024. https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/indonesia-presidential-candidate-anies-files-court-challenge-election-result-2024-03-21/.
Mahy, Petra. “The Functional Approach in Comparative Socio-Legal Research: Reflections Based on a Study of Plural Work Regulation in Australia and Indonesia.” International Journal of Law in Context 12, no. 4 (2016): 420–436.
Malay Mail. "Court Dismisses Bersatu’s Application for Judicial Review Against Dewan Rakyat Speaker’s Decision on Four Parliamentary Seats in Sabah." November 16, 2023. https://www.malaymail.com/news/malaysia/2023/11/16/court-dismisses-bersatus-application-for-judicial-review-against-dewan-rakyat-speakers-decision-on-four-parliamentary-seats-in-sabah/102349.
Michaels, Ralf. Comparative Law. In Oxford Handbook of European Private Law, edited by Basedow, Hopt, and Zimmermann. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/294430907_Comparative_Law.
Mohamad, Faiz Pan. “The Protection of Civil and Political Rights by the Constitutional Court of Indonesia.” Indonesia Law Review 6, no. 2 (2016): 158–179. DOI: 10.15742/ilrev.v6n2.230.
Mohamed Jaafar v. Sulaiman & Anor [1970] 1 MLJ 181
New Straits Times. “MIC's Ramasamy Appeals Against Dismissal of Election Petition for Segamat Seat.” April 26, 2023. https://www.nst.com.my/news/crime-courts/2023/04/903096/mics-ramasamy-appeals-against-dismissal-election-petition-segamat.
Ngastawa, I. “IMPLIKASI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 11-017/PUU-I/2003 TERHADAP PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM HAK DIPILIH.” Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) no. 4 (2015): 15. https://doi.org/10.24843/JMHU.2015.v04.i04.p15.
Parlina, Ina. “Constitutional Court Starts Hearing Hundreds of Election Disputes.” The Jakarta Post, May 24, 2014. https://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2014/05/24/constitutional-court-starts-hearing-hundreds-election-disputes.html.
Rahmat Khairulrijal. “Kemaman PN Rep Win in GE15 Annulled by Terengganu Election Court.” New Straits Times, September 26, 2023. https://www.nst.com.my/news/crime-courts/2023/09/959817/kemaman-pn-rep-win-ge15-annulled-terengganu-election-court.
Shuaib, Farid Sufian. “Comparative Law in Asia: The Case for Intra-Asia Intensification.” Indonesian Comparative Law Review, no. 1 (December 2018): 1–4. http://irep.iium.edu.my/id/eprint/70955.
Suhenda, Dio, and Nur Janti. “BREAKING: Court Rejects First of Two Petitions Seeking to Overturn Prabowo's Victory.” The Jakarta Post, April 22, 2024. https://www.thejakartapost.com/indonesia/2024/04/22/breaking-court-rejects-first-of-two-petitions-seeking-to-overturn-prabowos-victory.html.
Skrine. “Challenging the Result of an Election.” Written December 2018. https://www.skrine.com/insights/newsletter/december-2018-1/challenging-the-result-of-an-election.
Strangio, Sebastian. “Indonesian Court Rejects Petitions Seeking Rerun of Presidential Election.” The Diplomat, April 23, 2024. https://thediplomat.com/2024/04/indonesian-court-rejects-petitions-seeking-rerun-of-presidential-election/.
Tey, Tsun Hang. “Malaysia’s Electoral System: Government of the People?” Asian Journal of Comparative Law, no. 1 (January 2010): 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1017/S219460780000034X.
The Jakarta Post. "Losing Presidential Candidate Ganjar Calls for New Election." March 24, 2024. https://www.thejakartapost.com/indonesia/2024/03/24/losing-presidential-candidate-ganjar-calls-for-new-election.html.
The Jakarta Post. “Constitutional Court Also Rejects Petition by Losing Presidential Candidate Ganjar.” April 22, 2024. https://www.thejakartapost.com/indonesia/2024/04/22/constitutional-court-also-rejects-petition-by-losing-presidential-candidate-ganjar.html.
The Sun. “Federal Court Allows BN Candidate’s Appeal for Full Hearing of Segamat Election Petition.” August 18, 2023. https://thesun.my/local-news/federal-court-allows-bn-candidate-s-appeal-for-full-hearing-of-segamat-election-petition-EL11382134.
Yap, Po Jen, ed. Judicial Review of Elections in Asia. New York: Routledge, 2016.
Yatim, Hafiz. “Eleven Election Petitions Filed Nationwide, Four in Sabah.” The Edge Malaysia, January 31, 2023. https://theedgemalaysia.com/node/653581.
Yatim, Hafiz. “Eleven Election Petitions Filed Nationwide, Four in Sabah.” The Edge Malaysia, January 31, 2023. https://theedgemalaysia.com/node/653581.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
© Copyright 1993-2024 IIUM Press![]()
The IIUM Law Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
- Consent to publish: The Author(s) undertakes that the article named above is original and consents that the IIUM Press publishes it.
- Previous publication: The Author(s) guarantees that the article named above has not been published before in any form, that it is not concurrently submitted to another publication, and that it does not infringe anyone’s copyright. The Author(s) holds the IIUM Press and Editors of IIUM Law Journal harmless against all copyright claims.
- Transfer of copyright: The Author(s) hereby transfers the copyright of the article to the IIUM Press, which shall have the exclusive and unlimited right to publish the article in any form, including on electronic media. The Journal in turn grants the Author(s) the right to reproduce the article for educational and scientific purposes, provided the written consent of the Publisher is obtained.







