INCORPORATING THE ROME STATUTE INTO NATIONAL LAW: LESSONS FOR MALAYSIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31436/iiumlj.v31i2.895Keywords:
Rome Statute, Implementing Legislation, Dualist Theory, Single Comprehensive Enactment Modality, Consequential Amendments to National Laws.Abstract
Although the former Malaysian government, due to political pressure, decided not to proceed with accession to the Rome Statute, this is not the end of the game. To join the Rome Statute had been in principle accepted by preceding governments and has been the ardent hope of the civil society. How to incorporate the Rome Statute into the Malaysian legal system has been deliberated among the Malaysian government (including the Attorney General’s Chambers and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs), Malaysian Parliamentarians, and civil society since a long time ago. As adopting the Rome Statute is in the best interest of humanity as a whole, the idea will definitely revive at any time in the future when the political climate is favourable. The objectives of the present paper, therefore, are to rebut the main objections against the Rome Statute and to identify the best way of incorporating the Rome Statute into the Malaysian law once Malaysia decides to accede to it. This is a doctrinal legal research supplemented by a comparative methodology, focusing on an analysis of key provisions of the Rome Statute and the Malaysian laws that could be affected, and a comparison between the practices of selected dualist and monist countries. The paper finds that Malaysia, as a dualist State, should opt for applying the single comprehensive enactment modality rather than the multiple one. It is in the best interest of Malaysia for clarity and effectiveness purposes. It concludes with recommendations for the proposed draft implementing legislation, together with suggestions for consequential amendments.
Metrics
References
“ABIM Supports Malaysia Move to Accede to Rome Statute of ICC,” The Sun Daily, 05-03-2019, https://www.thesundaily.my/local/abim-supports-malaysia-move-to-accede-to-rome-statute-of-icc-YE644643, accessed September 10, 2023.
Abu Yusuf, Kitab al Kharaj, 5th ed. (Cairo: al-Matba’ah al-Salafiyyah, 1396AH), cited in Kamali, Freedom, Equality, at 56.
Abul A’la Mawdúdí, Human Rights in Islam, (Islamic Foundation: London, 1980) 33.
Badar, Mohamed Elewa. “Is There a Place for Islamic Law within the Applicable Law of the International Criminal Court?”, in Tallyn Gray (ed.), Islam and International Criminal Law and Justice, (Torkel Opsahl Academic EPublisher: Brussels, 2018) 201-232.
Baderin, Mashood A. “Islamic Socio-Legal Norms and International Criminal Justice in Context: Advancing an ‘Object and Purpose’ cum ‘Maqásid’ Approach,” in Islam and International Criminal Law and Justice, ed. Tallyn Gray, (Torkel Opsahl Academic Epublisher, 2018) 79; Kamali, above note 54, at 180.
Bekou, Olympia “In the hands of the State: Implementing legislation and complementarity,” in The International Criminal Court and Complementarity: From Theory to Practice, ed. C. Stahn, and Mohamed M. El Zeidy, (Cambridge University Press, 2011) 830.
Cassese, Antonio. “When May Senior State Officials be Tried for International Crimes? Some Comments on the Congo v Belgium Case,” British Yearbook of International Law, 13 (2002): 853-875.
Denza, Eileen. “The Relationship between International and National Law,” in International Law, ed. Malcolm Evans, 4th edn (Oxford University Press, 2014) 412. See also Olympia Bekou and S. Shah, “Realising the Potential of the International Criminal Court: The African Experience,” Human Rights Law Review, 6(3) (2006): 503.
Gillen, Mark R. “The Malay Rulers’ Loss of Immunity,” Occasional Paper 6, (University of Victoria: Canada, 1994); Mustafa, Che Norlia, The 1993 Royal Immunity Crisis: the Kerajaan, the Constitution and the Dilemma of a New Bangsa. Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) thesis, University of Kent, (2000), 75-79, https://kar.kent.ac.uk/86148/, accessed September 17, 2023.
Hamid, Abdul Ghafur @ Khin Maung Sein, Public International Law: A Practical Approach, 5th edn (Sweet & Maxwell, 2023) 54.
Harding, Andrew and Harshan Kumarasingham, “The Malay Monarchies in Constitutional and Social Conception,” Asian Journal of Law and Society, 9(3) (2022): 399-417.
“Implementing the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court,” Case Matrix Network (CMN), Centre for International Law Research and Policy, September 2017, https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/e05157/pdf/, accessed October 1, 2023.
James R, Crawford, Brownlie’s Principles of Public International Law, 8th edn. (Oxford University Press, 2008) 31-32.
Jasiuka, Ewa, Anna Konerta , Aleksandra Detynieckaa , Elwira Targońska, “The Responsibility of a State in the Shooting Down of Malaysian Airlines Flight MH 17,” Transportation Research Procedia 43 (2019):113–118.
Kamali, Mohammad Hashim. Freedom, Equality, and Justice in Islam. Petaling Jaya: Ilmiah Publishers, 2002.
Kamali, Mohammad Hashim. Shari‘ah Law: An Introduction. Oxford: One world Publication: 2008.
Kamel, Taymour. “The Principle of Legality and Its Application in Islamic Criminal Justice,” in Islamic Criminal Justice System, ed. M. Cherif Bassiouni, (Oceana Publications: New York, 1982) 149–50.
Kaul, Hans- Peter. “Germany: Methods and Techniques Used to Deal with Constitutional Sovereignty and Criminal Law Issues, in States’ Responses to Issues Arising from the ICC Statute, edited by Roy S.K. Lee, 73. London: Transnational Publishers, 2005.
Lim, Ida. “AG Calls Out Hypocrisy, Says BN Government Agrees to Rome Statute Since 2011,” Malay Mail, 27 April 2019, https://www.malaymail.com/news/malaysia/2019/04/27/ag-calls-out-hypocrisy-says-bn-government-agreed-to-rome-statute-since 2011/1747513, accessed August 15 2023.
“Malaysia Accedes to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court,” Press Release, Ministry of Foreign Affairs: Wisma Putra, Putra Jaya, 4 March 2019. https://www.kln.gov.my/web/guest/home, accessed September 28, 2023.
“Malaysia and the Rome Statute,” Parliamentarians for Global Action (PGA), https://www.pgaction.org/ilhr/rome-statute/malaysia.html, accessed September 28, 2023.
“Malaysia Should Not Ratify ICC Just to Look Good, Says Gani Patail”. BERNAMA. 10 March 2011; “AG: Don’t Join the ICC to Look Good,” Malaysia Kini, 10 March 2011, https://www.malaysiakini.com/news/158296, accessed August 19, 2023.
“Malaysia Should Ratify the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court,” Press Release of AG Khalidas, President of the Malaysian Bar, 16 July 2021, https://www.malaysianbar.org.my/article/news/press-statements/press-statements/press-release-malaysia-should-ratify-the-rome-statute-of-the-international-criminal-court-, accessed August 15, 2023.
“Malaysia Withdraws from the Rome Statute,” The Star Online, 5 April 2019, https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2019/04/05/malaysia-withdraws-from-the-rome-statute, accessed August 12, 2023; See also
“KL’s Rome Statute U-Turn A Move to Prevent Coup – Minister,” The Straits Times, 8 April 2019, https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/se-
asia/kls-rome-statute-u-turn-a-move-to-prevent-coup-minister, accessed August 13, 2023.
“Malaysian Bar Convenes Meeting to Discuss ICC,” Malaysian Bar (Badan Penguam Malaysia), 14 February 2007, https://www.malaysianbar.org.my/article/news/barnews/news/malaysian-bar-convenes-meeting-to-discuss-icc, accessed August 13, 2023.
“Malaysian Bar Urges the Malaysian Government to Accede to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court without Delay,” Press release: Malaysian Bar, 13 December 2011, https://www.malaysianbar.org.my/article/news/press-statements/press-statements/press-release-malaysian-bar-urges-the-malaysian-government-to-accede-to-the-rome-statute-of-the-international-criminal-court-without-delay, accessed August 14, 2023.
“Minister: Fear of Malay Rulers losing immunity reason Putrajaya yet to ink Rome Statute,” Malay Mail, 7 Nov 2013, citing the speech of the de facto Law Minister Nancy Shukri, https://www.malaymail.com/news/malaysia/2013/11/07/minister-fear-of-malay-rulers-losing-immunity-reason-putrajaya-yet-to-ink-r/558033 accessed November 17, 2023.
Muhammad Abu Zahrah, Tanzim al-Islam li’l-Mujtama, Cairo: Dar al-Fikr al-‘Arabi, 1385/1965, 160, cited in Kamali, Freedom, Equality, at 56.
Report on Constitutional Issues raised by the Ratification of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, CDL-INF (2001) 1, 15 January 2001, hereinafter, Venice Commission Report 2001) https://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDL-INF(2001)001-e, accessed 2 September 2023, 4-6.
Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala, Uganda, 31 May - 11 June 2010, Assembly of States Parties (ASP), https://asp.icc-cpi.int/reviewconference#registration, accessed August 15, 2023.
Schabas, William A. The International Criminal Court: A Commentary on the Rome Statute (Oxford University Press: Oxford, 2010), 403; Bruce Broomhall, “Article 22: Nullum crimen sine lege,” in Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, ed. Otto Triffterer and Kai Ambos), 2nd. ed., (Nomos: Baden-Baden, 2008), 714.
Second PGA Asia-Pacific Parliamentary Consultation on the Universality of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, Parliament of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, 9-10 March 2010, https://www.pgaction.org/news/kuala-lumpur.html, accessed August 15, 2023.
Shanmuga K., “International Criminal Court – An Update,” Praxis: Chronicle of the Malaysian Bar, July-August 2006, 35-37, at 37.
Tommy, Thomas. Forum on “Malaysia and Rome Statute,” held at Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur on 27 April 2019.
“UN Confirms Malaysia’s Withdrawal from the Rome statute,” New Straits Times, 16 May 2019. https://www.nst.com.my/news/nation/2019/05/488950/un-confirms-malaysias-withdrawal-rome-statute, accessed August 16, 2023.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
- Consent to publish: The Author(s) undertakes that the article named above is original and consents that the IIUM Press publishes it.
- Previous publication: The Author(s) guarantees that the article named above has not been published before in any form, that it is not concurrently submitted to another publication, and that it does not infringe anyone’s copyright. The Author(s) holds the IIUM Press and Editors of IIUM Law Journal harmless against all copyright claims.
- Transfer of copyright: The Author(s) hereby transfers the copyright of the article to the IIUM Press, which shall have the exclusive and unlimited right to publish the article in any form, including on electronic media. The Journal in turn grants the Author(s) the right to reproduce the article for educational and scientific purposes, provided the written consent of the Publisher is obtained.