URBAN ART IN MALAYSIA: EXPLORATION OF LEGAL ISSUES AND OPPORTUNITIES

Suriyati Salim

doi:10.31436/iiumlj.v32i1.894

Authors

Suriyati Salim Advocate & Solicitor of the High Court of Malaya (Non-Practising) and Ph.D. Candidate, Ahmad Ibrahim Kulliyyah of Laws, International Islamic University Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31436/iiumlj.v32i1.894

Keywords:

Urban Art, Public Art, Street Art, Graffiti, Mural, Regulatory and Legal Frameworks

Abstract

In Malaysia, there has been an increasing interest in arts within the urban spaces. Urban art, also known as public art, street art, graffiti and murals is used as a form of creative expression. However, the legal frameworks and complexities surrounding urban art have been underexplored. This study examines the existing legal frameworks and issues governing urban art in Malaysia through qualitative and doctrinal researches that involves a literature review of primary and secondary sources. The findings reveal a fine line between artistic expression and potentially criminal acts, particularly in cases of unauthorised creation. This highlights the urgent need to strengthen legal protection and recognition for artists. The study also highlights the economic benefits of integrating art into urban planning and policies, such as increased tourism and community development. However, analysis of relevant legal frameworks, including the Copyright Act 1987 and the National Heritage Act 2005, reveals their inadequacy in comprehensively addressing legal issues intrinsic to urban art. Therefore, this study concludes that there is a need for improved legal frameworks that protect artists’ rights and support the growth of urban art within the country.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Abdullah, Sarena, and Norshahidan Mohamad. ‘Incorporation and Exploration of Local Imageries and Identities in Malaysia’s Graffiti Art’. Journal of Visual Art and Design 7 (2015): 39–52. https://doi.org/10.5614/j.vad.2015.7.1.4.

Adelvand, Padideh, Ashrafosadat Mousavilar, and Seyed Amir Mansouri. ‘“Urban Art” as a Landscape Phenomenon in Today’s Society’. The Scientific Journal of NAZAR Research Center (Nrc) for Art, Architecture & Urbanism 13, no. 39 (2016): 43–50.

Bernama. ‘Selangor Sultan Describes Vandalism of “Covid-19 Heroes” Mural as Uncivilised’. Malaymail, 20 July 2020. https://www.malaymail.com/news/malaysia/2020/07/20/selangor-sultan-describes-vandalism-of-covid-19-heroes-murals-as-uncivilise/1886300.

Bonadio, Enrico. ‘Copyright Protection of Street Art and Graffiti under UK Law’. Intellectual Property Quarterly, no. 2 (2017): 1–331. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108563581.

Brajer, Isabelle. ‘The Problem of Vandalism on Contemporary Outdoor Murals and Street Art’. OpenEdition Journals, 2018. https://journals.openedition.org/ceroart/5761#text.

Castillo v. G&M Realty L.P., 950 F.3d 155 (2020).

Cheng, Chin Tiong, Gabriel Hoh Teck Ling, Hon-Choong Chin, and Pau Chung Leng. ‘Effects of Multifaceted Street Art on Price Premium of Pre-War Commercial Buildings: The Case of Georgetown UNESCO World Heritage Site’. Land 12 (2023): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12030626.

Copyright Act 1987 [Act 332], Pub. L. No. (Act 332), Intellectual Property Corporation of Malaysia (1987). https://www.myipo.gov.my/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Copyright-Act-1987-Act-332.pdf.

Director of Public Prosecutions v Noam Jason Shoan [2007] VSCA 220 (2007).

Fun, Chang Shu. ‘Street Art Sparkle As a New Economic Driver in Penang’. In 1st International Conference on Creative Media, Design & Technology (REKA) 2014. Pulau Pinang, Malaysia, 2014. http://eprints.usm.my/38640/.

Kamaruddin, Norfadilah, and Nik Nor Azidah Nik Aziz. ‘Exploration of Malaysian Public Awareness Towards Visual on Street Art Mural as a Medium of Communication’. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH) 7, no. 7 (2022): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v7i7.1595.

Lin, Phuah Ken. ‘Street Artists Get the Thumbs Down’. New Straits Times, 26 August 2014. https://www.nst.com.my/news/2015/09/street-artists-get-thumbs-down.

Local Government Act 1976 (Act 171) (2012). https://www.ppj.gov.my/storage/7423/171---LOCAL-GOVERNMENT-ACT-1976.pdf.

Mohamad Amirul Idham Mohd Ikhram, and Dr Yong Adilah Shamsul Harumain. ‘Mural And Graffiti: Street Art Or Vandalism?’ BERNAMA Thoughts, 12 May 2023. https://www.bernama.com/en/thoughts/news.php?id=2186237.

Mohd Fabian, H., M. T. Osman, and B. Mohd Nasir. ‘Towards Integrating Public Art in Malaysian Urban Landscape’. Pertanika Journal of Social Science and Humanities 20, no. 2 (2012): 251–63. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/289400407_Towards_integrating_public_art_in_Malaysian_urban_landscape.

Mustafa, M., M. Begum, A. Backer, and J. Dollah. ‘Questioning Public Art’. WIT Transactions on Ecology and The Environment 165 (2012): 103–14. https://doi.org/10.2495/ARC120101.

Mustafa, Muhizam B. ‘Public Sculpture in Malaysia: A Case Study of Putrajaya’. Birmingham City University, 2009. https://www.open-access.bcu.ac.uk/4930/.

National Heritage Act 2005 (Act 645) (2005). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203203330_chapter_6.

NNISA. ‘Murals and the Copyright Act’. New Straits Times, 19 October 2021. https://www.nst.com.my/opinion/letters/2021/10/737712/murals-and-copyright-act.

Penal Code [Act 574] (2018). http://www.agc.gov.my/agcportal/uploads/files/Publications/LOM/EN/Act 15.pdf.

Poon, Stephen T.F. ‘Street Murals as a Unique Tangible Cultural Heritage: A Case Study of Artifact Value Preservation’. International Journal of Cultural and Creative Industries 4, no. 1 (2016): 48–61. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Stephen-Poon-5/publication/310329387_Street_Murals_as_a_Unique_Tangible_Cultural_Heritage_A_Case_Study_of_Artifact_Value_Preservation/links/582bd05008ae102f0720987d/Street-Murals-as-a-Unique-Tangible-Cultural-Heritage-

Radosevic, Lliljana. ‘Graffiti, Street Art, Urban Art: Terminological Problems and Generic Properties’. International Journal of Special Education 30, no. 2 (2013): 3–14. https://jyx.jyu.fi/bitstream/handle/123456789/43965/radosevicgraffiti.pdf?isAllowed=y&sequence=1.

Razak, Dzulkifli Abdul. ‘Vandalism a Form of Hatred That Must Be Eliminated’. New Straits Times, 23 July 2020. https://www.nst.com.my/opinion/columnists/2020/07/610799/vandalism-form-hatred-must-be-eliminated.

Salau, Jimmy Anak, Qistina Donna Lee Abdullah, Salmiah Abdul Hamid, Abdul Hamid, and Aliffazraie Jali. ‘Developing A Conceptual Framework of Street Arts Project In Preserving The Malaysian Culture’. Journal of Business and Social Development 6, no. 1 (2018): 84–93. https://jbsd.umt.edu.my/wp-content/uploads/sites/53/2018/03/6.1.8.pdf.

Shipley, David E. ‘Architects, Artists, Photographers, Property Owners, the Public and Their Rights: Reconciling VARA, the AWCPA, and Copyright Fundamentals’. University of Georgia School of Law Research Paper Series Paper 2 (2023).

Shobri, Nor Izana Mohd, Siti Rasidah Md Sakip, and Noorlida Daud. ‘Public Perception Towards Graffiti Art in Malaysia’. Advanced Science Letters 23, no. 7 (2017): 6203–7. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2017.9236.

Smith, Cathay Y. N. ‘Street Art: An Analysis under U.S. Intellectual Property Law and Intellectual Property’s Negative Space Theory’. DePaul Journal of Art, Technology and Intellectual Property Law 24 (2014): 259–93.

Talent & Tagging in Harmony: A Study of Graffiti Art as Subculture & Aesthetic Expression of Urbanization in Malaysia’. Journal of Urban Culture Research 26 (2023): 5–28. https://doi.org/10.14456/jucr.2023.1.

Young, Alison. ‘Criminal Images: The Affective Judgment of Graffiti and Street Art’. Crime, Media, Culture, 2012, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741659012443232.

Zakariya, Khalilah, and Syamim Azhari. ‘Eco Public Art Placemaking Framework: A Case Study Of Laman Seni Shah Alam, Malaysia’. Journal of the Malaysian Institute of Planners 15, no. 4 (2017): 91–104.