DISPUTE SETTLEMENT MECHANISMS UNDER THE UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON THE LAW OF THE SEA 1982: THE WAY FORWARD FOR MALDIVES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31436/iiumlj.v31i2.890Keywords:
LOSC 1982, Dispute Settlement Mechanism, Maldives, Mauritius, Maritime DelimitationAbstract
The maritime boundary delimitation judgment by the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea between Mauritius and the Maldives was the first Maldivian dispute settled at an international court or tribunal. Regrettably, misinterpretation and misinformation regarding international laws and the Maldivian domestic laws related to the dispute became prevalent among the Maldivian community. One of the core concerns that need to be addressed is how Maldives got subjected to a legally binding dispute settlement mechanism concerning a dispute that was initially regarding the sovereignty over the Chagos Archipelago between two other States, namely: Mauritius and the United Kingdom. Additionally, it is important to determine whether Maldives has any other legal means to safeguard its maritime zones from future maritime disputes. The main objective of this paper is to explore the dispute settlement mechanisms under Part XV of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (LOSC) and determine how these provisions can be utilised to safeguard the Maldivian maritime zones. This research is primarily a doctrinal legal research. Firstly, the article outlines the provisions under Part XV of the LOSC whilst exploring its drafting history. Next, the article analyses the optional exception on maritime delimitation under LOSC Article 298(1)(a) and its significance to the Maldivian situation. It suggests that considering the undelimited outer continental shelves of Maldives, Maldives should consider declaring an optional exception under LOSC Article 298(1)(a). The article concludes that optional declarations serve as safeguards against premature and costly dispute resolution.
Metrics
References
Agusman, Damos and Bernard H. Oxman, “Adjudicators, Negotiators and the Evolution of Maritime Delimitation Law: Indonesia’s Perspective,” in Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law), vol. 112 (Cambridge University Press, April 4–7, 2018), 288, https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/26628140.
Ásgeirsdóttir, Áslaug and Martin Steinwand, “Dispute Settlement Mechanisms and Maritime Boundary Settlements,” The Review of International Organizations 10, no. 2 (June 2015): 4, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-015-9217-9.
Boyle, Alan. E. “Dispute Settlement and the Law of the Sea Convention: Problems of Fragmentation and Jurisdiction,” International and Comparative Law Quarterly 46, no. 1 (January 1997): 40, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589300060103.
Burri, Thomas and Jamie Trinidad, “Dispute Concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Mauritius and Maldives in the Indian Ocean, Preliminary Objections (ITLOS),” International Legal Materials 60, no. 6 (December 2021): 969–1037, https://doi.org/10.1017/ilm.2021.20
Chakraborty, Anshuman. “Dispute Settlement Under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea and Its Role in Oceans Governance” (LLM Thesis, Victoria University of Wellington, 2006), 79; Sohn, “Ocean Conflicts,” 198.
Churchill, Robin. “Dispute Settlement in the Law of the Sea: Survey for 2022,” The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 38 (September 28, 2023): 21, https://doi.org/10.1163/15718085-bja10145.
“East Timor Country Profile,” BBC News, September 14, 2011, accessed June 9, 2023, https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-pacific-14919009.
Emilia Justyna Powell and Sara McLaughlin Mitchell, “Forum Shopping for the Best Adjudicator: Dispute Settlement in the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea,” The Journal of Territorial and Maritime Studies 9, no. 1 (2022): 8, 23, https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/48684177.
Gaertner, Marianne P. “The Dispute Settlement Provisions of the Convention on the Law of the Sea: Critique and Alternatives to the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea,” San Diego Law Review 19, no. 3 (April 1982): 581,https://digital.sandiego.edu/sdlr/vol19/iss3/8.
Gaver, Craig D. “Dispute Concerning the Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Mauritius and Maldives in the Indian Ocean,” American Journal of International Law 115, no. 3 (July 2021): 524, https://doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2021.24
Hamid, Abdul Ghafur. “Refining Maritime Boundary Delimitation Methodology: The Search for Predictability and Certainty,” IIUM Law Journal 27, no. 1 (June 29, 2019): 61, https://doi.org/10.31436/iiumlj.v27i1.457.
Hamid, Abdul Ghafur. “The Principle That the Land Dominates the Sea in the Context of South China Sea Disputes: A Critical Appraisal,” IIUM Law Journal 30, no. 2 (2022): 52.
Hamid, Abdul Ghafur. Public International Law: A Practical Approach, 4th ed. (Malaysia: Sweet & Maxwell Asia, 2019), 311.
Hamidullah, Muhammad. The Muslim Conduct of State (Kuala Lumpur: Islamic Book Trust, 2012), 34
Hao, Duy Phan, “The Precedent-Setting Timor-Leste and Australia UNCLOS Case,” The Diplomat, September 29, 2016, accessed June 19, 2023, https://thediplomat.com/2016/09/the-precedent-setting-timor-leste-and-australia-unclos-case/.
Hogan, Michael. “U.N. Court Orders Ghana to Release Argentine Naval Ship,” Reuters, December 15, 2012, accessed June 28, 2023, https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-ghana-argentina-ship-idUKBRE8BE07520121215.
Ibrahim, Nafaahath. “Government: No Previous Government Claimed Chagos as Part of Maldives,” Sun Online International, October 26, 2022, accessed September 11, 2023, https://en.sun.mv/78539.
“ICJ Rejects Kenya Case in Somalia Maritime Border Row,” BBC News, October 12, 2021, accessed June 25, 2023, https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-58885535.
“ICJ: Colombia Must Stop Activity in Nicaraguan EEZ Waters,” Al Jazeera, April 21, 2022, accessed June 28, 2023, https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/4/21/icj-colombia-must-stop-activity-in-nicaraguan-eez-waters
Ishan Jan, Mohammad Naqib. Principles of Public International Law: A Modern Approach, 1st ed (Kuala Lumpur: International Islamic University Malaysia, 2008), 284; Powell and Mitchell, “Forum Shopping,” 8.
Islam, Asraful, Amira Paripurna, and Zahidul Islam, “Dispute Settlement under the UNCLOS with Special Reference to Compulsory Procedures: An Appraisal,” Journal of Asian and African Social Science and Humanities 7, no. 2 (2021): 51, https://www.aarcentre.com/ojs3/index.php/jaash/article/view/232/517
Kamali, Mohammad Hashim. Principles of Islamic Jurisprudence, 3rd ed. (United Kingdom: The Islamic Texts Society, 2013), 323, http://archive.org/details/principles-of-islamic-jurisprudence.
Kim, Sun Pyo. Maritime Delimitation and Interim Arrangements in North East Asia, vol. 40, Publications on Ocean Development (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2004), 14.
Klein, Natalie. “Chagos: A Boundary Dispute Tips Over a Sovereignty Ruling,” The Interpreter, February 8, 2021, accessed June 9, 2023, https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/chagos-boundary-dispute-tips-over-sovereignty-ruling.
Kumar Singh, Vinai. “Analysis of Advantages and Disadvantages of Forums Prescribed under the UNCLOS and State Practice: The Way
Ahead for India,” Revista de Direito Internacional, Brasília 13, no. 3 (2016): 333, 10.5102/rdi/bjil.v13i3.4380.
Liu, Chenhong. “How Should International Judicial Bodies Constituted Under UNCLOS Determine If They Have Jurisdiction Over Disputes Involving Territorial Sovereignty?,” Frontiers in Marine Science 9 (2022): 4-5, https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2022.1038843.
National Institute for South China Sea Studies, “A Legal Critique of the Award of the Arbitral Tribunal in the Matter of the South China Sea Arbitration,” in Asian Yearbook of International Law, vol. 24 (Brill Nijhoff, 2018), 151–293, https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004437784_009.
Østhagen, Andreas. “Maritime Boundary Disputes: What Are They and Why Do They Matter?,” Marine Policy 120 (October 2020): 5, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104118.
“Position Paper of the Government of the People’s Republic of China on the Matter of Jurisdiction in the South China Sea Arbitration Initiated by the Republic of the Philippines,” Chinese Journal of International Law 15, no. 2 (August 12, 2016): 450, 454, https://doi.org/10.1093/chinesejil/jmw024.
Rehan, Mohamed. “Speaker Claims Chagos Part of Maldives, Spoke Against UK Colonization,” The Edition, October 27, 2022, accessed September 11, 2023, http://edition.mv/fifa_world_cup_2022/26122.
Republic of the Maldives, “Submission by the Republic of Maldives to the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf - Executive Summary - MAL-ES-DOC,” July 26, 2010, accessed June 11, 2023, https://www.un.org/depts/los/clcs_new/submissions_files/submission_mdv_53_2010.htm.
Seyvanizad, Jaber. “Islamic International Law Concerning Law of Treaties” (International Conference on Law Political Science and Islamic Instructions, Tehran, 2017), 4, https://ssrn.com/abstract=3020173
Shaw, Malcolm N. International Law, 6th ed. (United States of America: Cambridge University Press, 2008), 1012
Sheehan, Anne. “Dispute Settlement under UNCLOS: The Exclusion of Maritime Delimitation Disputes,” The University of Queensland Law Journal, 2005, 172; Sohn, “Ocean Conflicts,” 196.
Sohn, Louis. B. “Peaceful Settlement of Disputes in Ocean Conflicts: Does UNCLOS III Point the Way?,” Law and Contemporary Problems 46, no. 2 (1983): 195, https://www.jstor.org/stable/1191525.
Sparks, Tom. “Reassessing State Consent to Jurisdiction: The Indispensable Third Party Principle before the ICJ,” Nordic Journal of International Law 91, no. 2 (May 9, 2022): 217, https://doi.org/10.1163/15718107-91020005.
“Statement by the Government of Maldives Regarding the Statement by the Progressive Congress Coalition on the Chagos Archipelago Issue,” The President’s Office, April 27, 2023, accessed September 11, 2023, https://presidency.gov.mv/Press/Article/28216.
Taisir Shammout, Hasan. “The Nature of Treaties in Islamic Jurisprudence and International Law,” International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change 15, no. 3 (2021): 281, https://ijicc.net/images/Vol_15/Iss_3/15325_Shammout_2021_E1_R.pdf.
Tanaka, Yoshifumi. The International Law of the Sea, 1st ed (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012), 398.
“The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea - A Historical Perspective,” Division for Ocean Affairs and the Law of the Sea, accessed July 5, 2023, https://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/convention_historical_perspective.htm.
United Nations, Handbook on the Peaceful Settlement of Disputes between States (New York: United Nations Publications, 1992), 74
Yusof, Salma. “The Law of Maritime Delimitation and The Malaysian Practice” (PhD Thesis, International Islamic University Malaysia, 2014), 69.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
- Consent to publish: The Author(s) undertakes that the article named above is original and consents that the IIUM Press publishes it.
- Previous publication: The Author(s) guarantees that the article named above has not been published before in any form, that it is not concurrently submitted to another publication, and that it does not infringe anyone’s copyright. The Author(s) holds the IIUM Press and Editors of IIUM Law Journal harmless against all copyright claims.
- Transfer of copyright: The Author(s) hereby transfers the copyright of the article to the IIUM Press, which shall have the exclusive and unlimited right to publish the article in any form, including on electronic media. The Journal in turn grants the Author(s) the right to reproduce the article for educational and scientific purposes, provided the written consent of the Publisher is obtained.
