A ROUTINE ACTIVITY APPROACH TO UNDERSTANDING THE REASONS FOR TECHNOLOGY-FACILITATED HARASSMENT AGAINST WOMEN IN INDIA

Authors

  • Samina Khan Faculty of Law, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
  • Rohaida Nordin Associate Professor at the Faculty of Law, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
  • Muhamad Sayuti Hassan Senior Lecturer at the Faculty of Law, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31436/iiumlj.v31i2.851

Keywords:

Technology-Facilitated Harassment, India, Routine Activity Theory, Women Harassment

Abstract

The rapid increase in technologies is forcing more people to be online, which is offering perpetrators to commit technology-facilitated harassment (TFH). This paper explores various reasons associated with the rise of TFH cases against women in India by employing routine activity theory (RAT). A conceptual framework is proposed to understand the reasons for technology facilitated- harassment against women (TFHW) in India. This paper adopted a qualitative methodology and observed that accessibility, anonymity, anger, revenge, and political agenda were the vital sources of motivation among perpetrators. The sharing of personal data, underreporting, lack of awareness of laws, negligence, less awareness of technology, gender perception in using the technology, and patriarchal society made women in India suitable targets. Lastly, a lack of effective laws, careless enforcement agencies, and no privacy settings materialised in the absence of a capable guardian. Thus, this paper provides a new perspective on RAT by utilising it on TFHW in India. Further, it will serve as a platform to locate how TFH incidents can be minimised by addressing the reasons in the context of a motivated offender, a suitable target, and a capable guardian. 

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Downloads

Published

2023-12-11

How to Cite

Khan, S., Nordin , R. ., & Hassan , M. S. . (2023). A ROUTINE ACTIVITY APPROACH TO UNDERSTANDING THE REASONS FOR TECHNOLOGY-FACILITATED HARASSMENT AGAINST WOMEN IN INDIA. IIUM Law Journal, 31(2), 229–252. https://doi.org/10.31436/iiumlj.v31i2.851