SYNTHETIC BIOLOGY AND BIOSAFETY GOVERNANCE IN THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE UNITED STATES

Authors

  • Frank Akpoviri Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
  • Zinatul Zainol Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
  • Syarul Baharum Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31436/iiumlj.v28i1.520

Keywords:

synthetic biology, biosafety, European Union, United States

Abstract

This article examines how synthetic biology, which is the construction of novel biological parts, devices, and systems, as well as the modification of regular organisms, impacts biosafety regimes in the European Union (EU) and the United States (US). The article examines the nature and benefits of synthetic biology. It then reviews associated biosafety challenges, before analysing the suitability of governance frameworks in the EU and the US in dealing with these challenges. Based on this analysis, the article contends that, despite some similarities with older technologies, synthetic biology is essentially novel. Consequently, it undermines existing biosafety regimes in both jurisdictions. The article advocates for effective governance, combining formal regulation and self-governance, in addition to the global coordination of governance measures. This will help maintain an agile policy and curtail any regulatory loopholes. This article fosters awareness on the existence of many unresolved controversies over the synthetic biology technology.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Frank Akpoviri, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia

Frank I. Akpoviri is a postgraduate research student at the Faculty of Law, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

Syarul Baharum, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia

Syarul N. Baharum is an Associate Professor and Deputy Director at the Institute of Systems Biology (INBIOSIS), Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

Downloads

Published

2020-06-30

How to Cite

Akpoviri, F. ., Zainol, Z., & Baharum, S. (2020). SYNTHETIC BIOLOGY AND BIOSAFETY GOVERNANCE IN THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE UNITED STATES . IIUM Law Journal, 28(1), 37–71. https://doi.org/10.31436/iiumlj.v28i1.520