THE LGBTQI+ UNDER THE ROME STATUTE AND THE PROSPECTS OF THE STATUTE’S UNIVERSAL RATIFICATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31436/iiumlj.v34i1.1217Keywords:
Rome Statute, ICC, LGBTQI Individuals, Universal Ratification, AmendmentAbstract
Since the Rome Statute, which established the International Criminal Court (ICC), came into force in July 2002, it has been ratified or acceded to by 125 states at present. These numbers have been fluctuating due to many factors, among others, for its universal ratification and its jurisdiction. Article 7(3) of the Rome Statute defines the term “gender” to be only male and female, but the Office of the ICC Prosecutor came out with a number of Policies on “Gender-Based Crimes” to broaden such a definition to also include LGBTQI+ persons as part of its definition. Based on the doctrinal analysis, this paper argues that to legally recognise LGBTQI+ persons under the term “gender”, it must be amended and approved by the Assembly of the State Parties to the Rome Statute and ratified by the State Parties in accordance with Part 11 and Article 121 of the Rome Statute. This paper concludes that such recognition, if succeeds, will hinder universal ratification or accession to the Rome Statute since many countries, both Parties and non-State Parties to the Rome Statute have not legally recognised LGBTQI+ persons under their respective laws.
Metrics
References
Alam, Aftab. “ICC and the Crime of Aggression: The Kampala Compromise or Consensus.” ISIL Year Book of International Humanitarian and Refugee Law 10 (2010): 149–81.
Alexander, James F. “The International Criminal Court and the Prevention of Atrocities: Predicting the Court’s Impact.” Villanova Law Review 54, no. 1 (2009): 1–56.
Almohawes, Mohamad. “The Obstacles To the Right To a Fair Trial Under the International Law: A Case Study of Al-Anfal and Srebrenica Genocide Trials.” Access to Justice in Eastern Europe 7, no. 4 (November 2024): 67–92.
Balisacan, Ryan Hartzell C. “Potential Legal Challenges to President Rodrigo Duterte’s Decision to Withdraw the Philippines from the Rome Statute.” Philippine Law Journal 91, no. 4 (2018): 774–804.
Bhaghamma, G. “A Comparative Analysis of Doctrinal and Non-Doctrinal Legal Research.” ILE Journal of Governance and Policy Review 1, no. 1 (2023): 88–94.
Carney, Charlotte. “Abolishing the International Criminal Court.” International Journal of Human Rights, ahead of print, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2025.2501570.
Carvalho, J. S. de. “The Powers of Silence: Making Sense of the Non-Definition of Gender in International Criminal Law.” Leiden Journal of International Law 35, no. 4 (2022): 963–85.
Clarke, Kamari Maxine. Affective Justice: The International Criminal Court and the Pan-Africanist Pushback. Durham; London: Duke University Press, 2019.
Coalition for the International Criminal Court. “Burundi and the ICC.” Accessed January 14, 2026. https://www.coalitionfortheicc.
org/latest/resources/burundi-and-icc.
———. “Our Story – Coalition for the International Criminal Court.” Accessed January 14, 2026. https://www.coalitionfortheicc.
org/about/our-story.
Colangelo, Anthony J. “The Emerging Crime of Persecution Based on Sexual Orientation.” Northwestern Journal of Human Rights 22, no. 3 (2024): 215–304.
Dissenha, Rui Carlo, and Derek Assenco Creuz. “The International Criminal Court at the Crossroads: Selectivity, Politics, and the Prosecution of International Crimes in A Post-Western World.” Brazilian Journal of International Law 21, no. 1 (2024): 52–88.
Dutton, Yvonne; and Milena Sterio. “Prosecuting Gender Persecution at the ICC: Definitions, Policies, and Practice.” Fordham International Law Journal 46, no. 5 (2023): 575–622.
Edwards, George E. “International Human Rights Law Challenges to the New International Criminal Court: The Search and Seizure Right to Privacy.” Yale Journal of International Law 26, no. 2 (2001): 323–412.
Ent, Lars van der. “Queering the Rome Statute: Searching for the International Criminal Court’s Potential to Do Justice to Queer People.” Australian Feminist Law Journal 50, no. 2 (July 2024): 185–206.
Eser, H. C. Mult Albin. “Towards an International Criminal Court: Genesis and Main Features of the Rome Statute.” University of Tasmania Law Review 20, no. 1 (2001): 1–28.
Fujita, Hisakazu. “Establishment of the International Criminal Court: Historic Significance of the Rome Statute.” Japanese Annual of International Law 42 (1999): 32–65.
Galand, Alexandre Skander. UN Security Council Referrals to the International Criminal Court: Legal Nature, Effects and Limits. Brill | Nijhoff, 2019.
Gegout, Catherine. “The International Criminal Court: Limits, Potential and Conditions for the Promotion of Justice and Peace.” Third World Quarterly 34, no. 5 (June 2013): 800–818.
Ghaeminasab, Fateme. “Examining the Dimensions of War Crimes in the Third Generation of International Criminal Courts.” Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory 27, no. 5 (2024): 1–16.
Grey, Rosemary. “On Hope, Reform and Risk: The Rome Statute’s Definition of ‘Gender’ and the Crimes Against Humanity Convention.” European Journal of International Law 36, no. 2 (2025): 369–98. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chaf026.
———. “On Hope, Reform and Risk: The Rome Statute’s Definition of ‘Gender’ and the Crimes Against Humanity Convention.”
European Journal of International Law 36, no. 2 (September 2025): 369–98. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chaf026.
Gupta, Pranita. “Child Soldiers and Gender-Based Crimes.” Indian Journal of Integrated Research in Law 3, no. 3 (2023): 1–9.
Haddad, Heidi Nichols. “After the Norm Cascade: NGO Mission Expansion and the Coalition for the International Criminal Court.”
Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations 19, no. 2 (August 2013): 187–206.
Hamid, Abdul Ghafur. “Malaysia and the Rome Statute: The Issue of Sovereignty.” IIUM Law Journal 27, no. 2 (December 2019): 279–316. https://doi.org/10.31436/iiumlj.v27i2.509.
International Criminal Court. Understanding the International Criminal Court. The Hague, 2020.
International Criminal Court / Assembly of States Parties. “States Parties – Chronological List.” Accessed January 14, 2026. https://asp.icc-cpi.int/states-parties/states-parties-chronological-list.
Isaac, Maike, and Olga Jurasz. “Towards an Intersectional Understanding of Conflict-Related Sexual Violence: Gender, Sexuality, and
Ethnicity at the ICTY.” International Criminal Law Review 18, no. 5 (2018): 853–82.
Jahan, Ramisa. “Can Israel Prevent The ICC From Conducting An Investigation In The Situation In Palestine?” JURNAL UNDANG-UNDANG DAN MASYARAKAT 31 (December 2022): 57–69. https://doi.org/10.17576/juum-2022-31-05.
Killingsworth, Matt. “Head of State Immunity, Order, Justice and the International Criminal Court: Limits of International Criminal Justice in International Society.” International Politics, ahead of print, September 26, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-024-00628-y.
Kirsch, Philippe, and John T. Holmes. “The Birth of the International Criminal Court: The 1998 Rome Conference.” Canadian Yearbook of International Law/Annuaire Canadien de Droit International 36, no. 1 (March 1999): 3–39. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0069005800006871.
Konforta, Marijana, and Maja Munivrana Vajda. “The Principle of Complementarity in the Jurisprudence of the ICC.” Zagreb Law Review 3, no. 1 (2014): 9–28.
Landrum, B. D. “The Globalization of Justice: The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.” Army Lawyer 2002, no. 9 (2002): 1–20.
Lasharie, Neiha. “Definitional Problems, Indefinite Solutions: Revisiting the ICC’s Conception of Gender in a Gender-Critical World.” Wisconsin International Law Journal 41, no. 1 (2024): 33–72. https://doi.org/10.59015/wilj.BHXV4659.
Mancini, Marina. “A Brand New Definition for the Crime of Aggression: The Kampala Outcome.” Nordic Journal of International Law 81, no. 2 (2012): 227–48.
Marlies Glasius. The International Criminal Court. 1st ed. London; New York: Routledge, 2006.
Mayans-Hermida, Beatriz E., and Barbora Hola. “Balancing ‘the International’ and ‘the Domestic’: Sanctions under the Icc Principle of Complementarity.” Journal of International Criminal Justice 18, no. 5 (2020): 1103–30.
Mohd Hassan, Fareed, and Noor Dzuhaidah Osman. “The Obligation to Prosecute Heads of State Under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC) And Customary International Law: The African and U.S. Perspectives.” Malaysian Journal of Syariah and Law 7, no. 1 (June 2019): 33–56. https://doi.org/10.33102/mjsl.v7i1.112.
Mouthaan, Solange. “Sexual Violence against Men and International Law – Criminalising the Unmentionable.” International Criminal Law Review 13, no. 3 (2013): 665–95. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718123-01303004.
Ncame, Noluthando P. “Justice in Conflict: Principle of Complementarity or Principle of Competition?” African Human Rights Law Journa 23, no. 1 (2023): 75–95.
Nurdyawati, Tika Tazkya, Anne Mardiah, and Raden Radhytia Rizal. “Equality Agenda, Sustainable Development Goals, and Muslim Countries’ Acceptance of LGBTQ.” PCD Journal 9, no. 2 (2022): 171–89.
Nwokike, Livinus I. “Law and Policy on Ecocide and Genocide: An Imperative Road to Amend the Rome Statute of International Criminal Court.” International Journal of Comparative Law and Legal Philosophy 2, no. 3 (2020): 74–80.
Office of the Prosecutor, International Criminal Court. Policy on Gender-Based Crimes: Crimes Involving Sexual, Reproductive and
Other Gender-Based Violence. The Hague, 2023.
Policy on the Crime of Gender Persecution. The Hague, 2022.
Office of the Prosecutor, International Criminal Court. Policy Paper on Sexual and Gender-Based Crimes. The Hague, 2014.
Prosecution’s Application under Article 58 for a Warrant of Arrest against Abdul Hakim Haqqani. ICC-02/17-225-Red. The Hague: International Criminal Court, 2025. https://www.icc-cpi.int/court-record/icc-02/17-225-red.
Prosecution’s Application under Article 58 for a Warrant of Arrest against Haibatullah Akhundzada. ICC-02/17-224-Red. The Hague: International Criminal Court, 2025. https://www.icc-cpi.int/sites/default/files/CourtRecords/0902ebd180a915c7.pdf.
Oosterveld, Valerie. “The Definition of ‘Gender’ in the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Step Forward or Back for International Criminal Justice?” Harvard Human Rights Journal 18, no. 1 (2005): 55–84.
Reed, Kyle, and M. P. Broache. “Partisanship, Military Constituencies, and District Competitiveness: Explaining Congressional Opposition to the International Criminal Court.” Global Studies Quarterly 5, no. 1 (December 2024): ksae088. https://doi.org/10.1093/isagsq/ksae088.
Review Conference of the Rome Statute. Resolution RC/Res.6 / Adopted at the 13th Plenary Meeting, on 11 June 2010. Kampala, 2010.
Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (1998).
Rosenne, Shabtai. “Antecedents of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court Revisited.” International Law Studies Series, U.S. Naval War College 75 (2000): 387–420.
Schmitt, Michael N., and Peter J. Richards. “Into Uncharted Waters: The International Criminal Court.” Naval War College Review 53, no. 1 (2000): 93–136.
Shatzman, Aliza. “The Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo: Persistent Evidentiary Challenges Facing the International Criminal Court.” George Mason International Law Journal 12, no. 2 (2021): 1–38.
Shereshevsky, Yahli. “Complementarity (Un)Fairness.” Journal of International Criminal Justice 23, no. 2 (May 2025): 227–48. https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqaf013.
Ssenyonjo, Manisuli. “State Withdrawal Notifications from the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: South Africa, Burundi and the Gambia.” Criminal Law Forum 29, no. 1 (2018): 63–120.
The African Centre for Democracy and Human Rights Studies. “Joint Communiqué of the States of the AES Confederation Relating to the Withdrawal from the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.” African Union, 2025.
United Nations. “Official Records, Volume I: Final Documents.” United Nations Diplomatic Conference of Plenipotentiaries on the
Establishment of an International Criminal Court (New York) I (2002).
“Official Records, Volume II: Summary Records of the Plenary Meetings and of the Meetings of the Committee of the Whole.”
United Nations Diplomatic Conference of Plenipotentiaries on the Establishment of an International Criminal Court (New York), 2002.
Report of the Fourth World Conference on Women Beijing, 4-15 September 1995. 1995.
Resolution 1 of The Fourth World Conference on Women / Adopted at the 16th Plenary Meeting, on 15 September 1995. 1995.
United Nations General Assembly. Report of the Preparatory Committee on the Establishment of an International Criminal Court. Volume 1, Proceedings of the Preparatory Committee during March-April and August 1996. New York, 1996.
Resolution 50/46 (1995) / Adopted by the General Assembly at Its Fiftieth Session, on 18 December 1995. New York, 1995.
Resolution 51/207 (1997) / Adopted by the General Assembly at Its Fifty-First Session, on 16 January 1997. New York, 1997.
United Nations Security Council. Resolution 827 (1993) / Adopted by the Security Council at Its 3217th Meeting, on 25 May 1993. New York, 1993.
Resolution 955 (1994) / Adopted by the Security Council at Its 3453rd Meeting, on 8 November 1994. New York, 1994.
Weisbord, Noah. “Diplomatic Practices: Activating the Crime of Aggression.” American University International Law Review 40, no. 2 (2025): 485–536.
Zimmermann, Andreas. “Finally...Or Would Rather Less Have Been More? The Recent Amendment on the Deletion of Article 124 of the Rome Statute and the Continued Quest for the Universality of the International Criminal Court.” Journal of International Criminal Justice 14 (2016): 505–17.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
© Copyright 1993-2026 IIUM Press![]()
The IIUM Law Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
- Consent to publish: The Author(s) undertakes that the article named above is original and consents that the IIUM Press publishes it.
- Previous publication: The Author(s) guarantees that the article named above has not been published before in any form, that it is not concurrently submitted to another publication, and that it does not infringe anyone’s copyright. The Author(s) holds the IIUM Press and Editors of IIUM Law Journal harmless against all copyright claims.
- Transfer of copyright: The Author(s) hereby transfers the copyright of the article to the IIUM Press, which shall have the exclusive and unlimited right to publish the article in any form, including on electronic media. The Journal in turn grants the Author(s) the right to reproduce the article for educational and scientific purposes, provided the written consent of the Publisher is obtained.







