• Munira Shahbuddin Department of Chemical Engineering and Sustainability, Kulliyyah of Engineering, IIUM
  • Raha Abdul Raus Department of Chemical Engineering and Sustainability, Kulliyyah of Engineering, IIUM
  • Aqilah Yusof Department of Chemical Engineering and Sustainability, Kulliyyah of Engineering, IIUM
  • Siti Syazwani Mahamad Department of Chemical Engineering and Sustainability, Kulliyyah of Engineering, IIUM


KGM, bacteria binding polymer, bacteria removal, wound healing, antibacteria, polysaccharide hydrogels


This project focused on the development of polysaccharides hydrogels from Konjac Glucomannan (KGM) and Xanthan gum in removing the bacterial load on wound. This new therapy design is due to the traditional wound care methods using antibiotic and normal hydrogel cannot adequately treat biofilm infected wounds to healing process. For the treatment of bacterial infected wound, bacterial removal need to be done physically and manually by debridement, which is very painful and require the use of general anesthesia. Therefore, to reduce the formation of slough and necrotic tissue by the formation of bacterial biofilm, there is a need of specific hydrogels that will able to remove bacterial from the wounded site so it will prevent further infection and enhance the healing process. This study focused on the design and optimization of polysaccharide based hydrogels for the wound treatment. Polysaccharide based hydrogels from Konjac Glucomannan (KGM) and Xanthan gum were developed at  different ratio to optimize the physical and chemical properties of the hydrogel that relate to the effectiveness of bacterial removal. Film casting technique was used in the development of the hydrogel film. Konjac Glucomannan (KGM) and Xanthan gum were selected because of their natural polymers properties which are non – toxic, biocompatible and safe to be used. The hydrogels were tested in vitro for bacterial removal efficacy, using E.coli species colonies cultured on a gel inside a petri dish to represent the condition of bacteria infested wound bed. Hydrogel with 50 : 50 % composition blend of KGM-XG was found to be the most effective in the removal of E.coli colonies with 13x103 CFU/mL at 95% water content. Morphological studies of hydrogels showed flat interfacial morphologies, except the sample with 100% of Xanthan without KGM. The results present in this study suggested that the biological activities and adhesion of the hydrogels were not controlled only by the chemical structure but also the composition of compound and the amount of water present in the hydrogels.


Download data is not yet available.


Ahmed, E. M. (2015). Hydrogel: Preparation, characterization, and applications: A review. Journal of Advanced Research, 6(2), 105–121. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2013.07.006

Baguet, J., Sommer, F., Claudon-Eyl, V. & Duc, T.M. (1995a). Characterization of lacrymal component accumulation on worn soft contact lens surfaces by atomic force microscopy. Biomaterials, 16, 3–9, 0142-9612 (Print) Comparative Study Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t. 104, 111, 112, 114, 120, 287, 288

Cunliffe, D., Smart, C. a, Alexander, C., & Vulfson, E. N. (1999). Bacterial Adhesion at Synthetic Surfaces Bacterial Adhesion at Synthetic Surfaces, 65(11), 4995–5002.

Daeschel, M. a M. a, & McGuire, J. J. (1998). Interrelationships between protein surface adsorption and bacterial adhesion. Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering Reviews, 15(May), 413–438. http://doi.org/10.1080/02648725.1998.10647964

Das, N. (2013). Preparation methods and properties of hydrogel: A review. International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 5(3), 112–117.

Dutta, D., Cole, N., & Willcox, M. (2012). Factors influencing bacterial adhesion to contact lenses. Molecular Vision, 18, 14–21.

Engelsen, S. B., & Pérez, S. (1997). Internal motions and hydration of sucrose in a diluted water solution. Journal of Molecular Graphics & Modelling, 15(2), 122–31, 107.

Khalili, A. A., & Ahmad, M. R. (2015). A Review of Cell Adhesion Studies for Biomedical and Biological Applications. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 16(8), 18149–84. http://doi.org/10.3390/ijms160818149

Mansur, H. S., Oréfice, R. L., & Mansur, A. A. P. (2004). Characterization of poly(vinyl alcohol)/poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels and PVA-derived hybrids by small-angle X-ray scattering and FTIR spectroscopy. Polymer, 45(21), 7193–7202. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2004.08.036

Mitik-Dineva, N., Stoddart, P. R., Crawford, R. J., & Ivanova, E. (2009). Bacterial cell interactions with optical fiber surfaces.

Palmer, J., Flint, S., & Brooks, J. (2007). Bacterial cell attachment, the beginning of a biofilm. Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology, 34(9), 577–588. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-007-0234-4

Scheuerman, T., Camper, A., & Hamilton, M. (1998). Effects of Substratum Topography on Bacterial Adhesion. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 208(1), 23–33. http://doi.org/10.1006/jcis.1998.5717

Shahbuddin, M., Macneil, S., & Rimmer, S. (2013). Development of konjac glucomannan hydrogel for wound healing, (October).

Sivanmaliappan, T. S., & Sevanan, M. (2011). Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from Diabetes Patients with Foot Ulcers. International Journal of Microbiology, 2011, 605195. http://doi.org/10.1155/2011/605195

Sousa, C., Teixeira, P., & Oliveira, R. (2009). Influence of Surface Properties on the Adhesion of Staphylococcus epidermidis to Acrylic and Silicone. International Journal of Biomaterials, 2009, 1–9. http://doi.org/10.1155/2009/718017



How to Cite

Shahbuddin, M., Abdul Raus, . R. ., Yusof, A. ., & Mahamad, S. S. . (2022). HETEROPOLYSACCHARIDE OF KGM-XANTHAN HYDROGELS FOR THE REMOVAL OF BACTERIA IN A WOUND MODEL. Chemical and Natural Resources Engineering Journal (Formally Known As Biological and Natural Resources Engineering Journal), 6(2), 8–18. Retrieved from https://journals.iium.edu.my/bnrej/index.php/bnrej/article/view/73