شبهات مخالفة القواعد النحوية والصرفية في القرآن الكريم لدى المستشرقين والرد عليها

Abstract

The study investigated how orientalists responded to allegations and suspicions that the Holy Qur'an violated grammatical and morphological rules. Orientalists began to have doubts regarding the Qur'anic language's authenticity, both in terms of grammatical and morphological standards, as well as its rhetorical impact on some verses of the Holy Qur'an. The study mentioned some examples of these suspicions through two topics, the first topic dealt with the suspicion of violating the grammatical rules, brought by the suspicion reported by orientalists about the plural (iqtataloo "اقتتلوا" (fought)) [Al-Hujurat: 9] and the second suspicion is the separation of the genitive and the added in the recitation of Ibn Amer in Surat [Al-An’am: 137] as he recited (shurakaohum"شُرَكَاؤُهُمْ" partners) (shrkaehm "شركائهم" (While the second topic dealt with the suspicion of the Holy Qur’an’s violation of the morphological rules in the Almighty’s saying in [Al-Baqarah: 177], claiming that the right is to recite Al-Birr "البِر" Al-Barr "البَر" depending on a statement by Al-Mubarrad that the last word is the right one. Also, the orientalists criticize the verb “ohkum” "احكم" in Almighty’s saying “O my Lord! judge Thou in truth!” based on an unacceptable recitation by reciting the verb in the form of the elative “Afa’al”. These suspicions were conveyed through the study, and the results are suitable for responding to all suspicions of the Quranic language's authenticity. The study concluded many results including: The plural in the verb (iqtataloo "اقتتلوا" (fought)) because the addressee is a group as the speech is for the group and not for the Muthanna (dual).There is a mistake in separating the genitive and the added if the speech was clear and the speaker was eloquent.