THE ANTI-ISLAMIST DISCOURSE: THE CASE OF AL-BUTI

Authors

  • Bachar Bakour
  • Abdelaziz Berghout

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31436/shajarah.v23i1.667

Keywords:

Islamist, discourse, Takfir, da'wah, moderate, extreme, tatarrus

Abstract

This paper explores al-Būṭī’s critical view on contemporary Islamists who, according to al-Būṭī, have misapplied the Islamic law and sacrificed dawah in favour of political gains. Among their dogmatic beliefs is the ruthless and hasty call for the establishment of the Islamic state, the takfīr of rulers, arbitrary application of the question of tatarrus, etc. Having  presented and evaluated al-Būṭī’s views pertaining  to Islamists’ position on the above issues, the paper further attempts to examine  whether they are applicable to contemporary movements or not. This was done through consulting the literature of the most eminent Islamist movements (izb al-Tarīr, the Muslim Brotherhood, jihadists, the AKP, and izb al-Naha). The paper followed textual analysis aspiring towards providing a more comprehensive approach to the study of al-Būṭī’s views. Accordingly, seven important issues were selected and used to assess the position of movements according to al-Būṭī’s approach. It concludes, that al- Būṭī’s anti-Islamist discourse deserves to be taken as a yardstick against which a clear distinction is made between extreme and moderate Islamist movements. The paper also suggested several measures to further enhance research in this important area of study.    

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2018-07-09

How to Cite

Bakour, Bachar, and Abdelaziz Berghout. 2018. “THE ANTI-ISLAMIST DISCOURSE: THE CASE OF AL-BUTI”. Al-Shajarah: Journal of the International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilization (ISTAC) 23 (1):183-206. https://doi.org/10.31436/shajarah.v23i1.667.

Issue

Section

ARTICLES