Phantom Pain in Major Lower Limb Amputation: Primary Ligation Cauterization vs Traction Neurectomy
Introduction: Phantom Limb Pain (PLP) is haunting amputees in silent. Neuroma hyperexcitability is one of the popular peripheral theories which can be addressed during primary amputation by orthopaedic surgeons. There was no study comparing type of neurectomy association with PLP. The objective was to compare the occurrence of PLP between conventional and alternative techniques of neurectomy in major lower limb amputations. Materials and Methods: A prospective, randomized, interventional study was conducted involving 98 patients in Hospital Kuala Lumpur requiring major lower limb amputation due to diabetic complication, tumor and trauma from October 2016 to June 2017. Patients were evenly randomized into two groups; Group A: conventional traction neurectomy (CTN) and Group B: ligation and cauterization neurectomy (LCN). End point of the study was the outcome of PLP which was assessed clinically at post-operative day 3, 14 and 6-month. Results were analyzed using univariate and multivariate simple logistic regression. Results: There were have 47 and 46 patients in Group A and B respectively. Of these, 70.2% in Group A (n=33) and 28.3% in Group B (n=13) end up with PLP (p<0.001). Sixty nine percent of patients who underwent amputation above knee level (n=20) suffered from PLP (p<0.05). Group B patients had higher mean PLP pain score (3.31 and 2.94) but it was not statistically significant. 69.6% of patients with pre-operative pain (n=32) and 43.5% with peripheral vascular disease (n=20) developed PLP (p<0.05). Conclusion: LCN has 0.1 chance to develop PLP compared to CTN. Other significant factors in those who developed PLP include levels of amputation, pre-operative pain and peripheral vascular disease. LCN should be considered in primary amputation.
How to Cite
All material submitted for publication is assumed to be submitted exclusively to the IIUM Medical Journal Malaysia (IMJM) unless the contrary is stated. Manuscript decisions are based on a double-blinded peer review process. The Editor retains the right to determine the style and if necessary, edit and shorten any material accepted for publication.
IMJM retain copyright to all the articles published in the journal. All final ‘proof’ submissions must be accompanied by a completed Copyright Assignment Form, duly signed by all authors. The author(s) or copyright owner(s) irrevocably grant(s) to any third party, in advance and in perpetuity, the right to use, reproduce or disseminate the research article in its entirety or in part, in any format or medium, provided that no substantive errors are introduced in the process, proper attribution of authorship and correct citation details are given, and that the bibliographic details are not changed. If the article is reproduced or disseminated in part, this must be clearly and unequivocally indicated.