Diagnostic Accuracy of Intraoperative Frozen Sections in the Diagnosis of Central Nervous System Lesions: A Hospital-Based Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31436/imjm.v19i3.1662Abstract
Introduction: Intraoperative frozen section (FS) is an important tool in the management of neoplastic and non-neoplastic central nervous system (CNS) lesions. Although the final pathological diagnosis is based on the findings in paraffin tissue sessions, interpreting FS of CNS lesion is to assist the neurosurgeon in making the accurate judgment regarding the nature of the lesion and tissue adequacy. This study was to evaluate the agreement between FS and paraffin sections (PS) results; and to highlight the possible causes of error in discrepancy between FS and PS. Materials & Methods: This is a retrospective study of 85 cases of FS. H&E stained sections of both FS and PS of all these cases were reviewed with their histopathological reports. FS and PS results were compared. Possible causes of errors were reviewed and recorded. Results: Out of 85 cases; 76 cases (89.4%) showed no discrepancy, 2 cases (2.4%) minor discrepancy and 7 cases (8.2%) discrepancy. Sensitivity and specificity of FS were 90.1% and 85.7% respectively. Positive predictive value was 97.0% and negative predictive value was 63.1%. The false positive rate was 14.2% and false negative rate was 36.8%. The overall accuracy of FS was 89.4%. Conclusion: Our results showed high accuracy and specificity of FS. Therefore, FS is still useful, an effective tool for neurosurgeon although there are some challenges for histopathologists in reporting FS. The commonest discrepancy was seen between reactive gliosis and low-grade glioma. Over-diagnosis or under-diagnosis of FS can be reduced by closed cooperation among pathologist, neurosurgeon and radiologist.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All material submitted for publication is assumed to be submitted exclusively to the IIUM Medical Journal Malaysia (IMJM) unless the contrary is stated. Manuscript decisions are based on a double-blinded peer review process. The Editor retains the right to determine the style and if necessary, edit and shorten any material accepted for publication.
IMJM retain copyright to all the articles published in the journal. All final ‘proof’ submissions must be accompanied by a completed Copyright Assignment Form, duly signed by all authors. The author(s) or copyright owner(s) irrevocably grant(s) to any third party, in advance and in perpetuity, the right to use, reproduce or disseminate the research article in its entirety or in part, in any format or medium, provided that no substantive errors are introduced in the process, proper attribution of authorship and correct citation details are given, and that the bibliographic details are not changed. If the article is reproduced or disseminated in part, this must be clearly and unequivocally indicated.