E-Governance System Key Successful Implementation Factors
Keywords:
E-governance framework system, Syrian citizens, Structural equation modelAbstract
The usage of innovative communication technology and new computer systems increases the value of the E-governance for the provision of services to remote citizens. Such development provides the government and its organization an option to address the challenges connected with conventional delivery approaches. Within this consideration, the approval of the E-governance is deemed crucial in deciding the effectiveness of its application. The primary objectives of this research are therefore to define the reasons that contribute to the recognition of citizens in Syria by the e-governance system in order to suggest a model of technical acceptance of the e-governance system by citizens in Syria. Questionnaires were distributed through a survey to citizens of Syria. As partially of the structural equation model, (AMOS and SPSS) version 21.0 used to examine the collection data. As a consequence, on the basis of these results, a final study framework is suggested to clarify and forecast Syrian citizens’ decision to use the E-governance framework.
References
Silcock, R. (2001). What is e-government. Parliamentary affairs, 54(1), 88-101.
Fang, Z., 2002. E-government in digital era: concept, practice, and development. International journal of the Computer, the Internet and management, 10(2), pp.1-22.
Leitold, H., Hollosi, A., & Posch, R. (2002). Security architecture of the Austrian citizen card concept. Paper presented at the 18th Annual Computer Security Applications Conference, 2002. Proceedings.
Alzahrani, A.I., 2011. Web-based e-Government services acceptance for G2C: A structural equation modelling approach.
UN-DPEPA. (2001). Benchmarking E-government: A Global Perspective.
Moon, J., & Kim, Y. (2001). Extending the technology acceptance model for the World Wide Web context: Playfulness salient belief. Information & Management, 38(4), 217-230.
Schaupp, L.C. and Carter, L., 2005. E-voting: from apathy to adoption. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 18(5), pp.586-601. Alkhuwaylidee, A. (2019). ICT CHALLENGES IN EDUCATION AND ITS IMPLEMENTATION. Paper presented at the Technologies for developing information systems TRIS-2019.
Ebbers, W. E., Pieterson, W. J., & Noordman, H. N. (2008). Electronic government: Rethinking channel management strategies. Government Information Quarterly, 25(2), 181-201.
Streib, G., & Navarro, I. (2006). Citizen demand for interactive e-government: The case of Georgia consumer services. The american review of public administration, 36(3), 288-300.
Cordella, A., & Tempini, N. (2015). E-government and organizational change: Reappraising the role of ICT and bureaucracy in public service delivery. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 279- 286.
Algharibi, A., Keung, L. C., Niukyun, S., Zhao, L., Tyler, E., Taweel, A., Hobbs, R. (2012). Adapting the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) as a tool for assessing future technology adoption of e-trial software tools. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Information Communication Technologies in Health.
Alzahrani, M.E. and Goodwin, R.D., 2012. Towards a UTAUT-based model for the study of E- Government citizen acceptance in Saudi Arabia. In Proceedings of World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology (No. 64). World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology.
Carter, L. and Belanger, F., 2004. The influence of perceived characteristics of innovating on e- government adoption. Electronic Journal of E-government, 2(1), pp.11-20.
Lean, O.K., Zailani, S., Ramayah, T. and Fernando, Y., 2009. Factors influencing intention to use e- government services among citizens in Malaysia. International Journal of Information Management, 29(6), pp.458-475.
Phang, C.W., Sutanto, J., Li Y. & Kankanhalli, A, 2005, senior citizens' adoption of egovernment: in quest of the antecedents of perceived usefulness, proceedings of the 38th Hawaii international conference on system sciences, IEEE.
Al-Zu'bi, M.I.S., 2012. Electronic government adoption model among business organizations in Jordan (Doctoral dissertation, Universiti Utara Malaysia).
Alkhuwaylidee, A., & Almahdy, A. S. (2019). SYRIAN E-GOVERNMENT FRAMEWORK TOWARD GOVERNMENT EXCELLENCE SERVIC. Paper presented at the Technologies for developing information systems TRIS-2019.
Unger, P. and Dougherty, R., 2013. Accreditation: Facilitating world trade. In International Accreditation Forum. Retrieved July (Vol. 18, p. 2013).
Weerakkody, V., Janssen, M. and Dwivedi, Y.K., 2011. Transformational change and business process reengineering (BPR): Lessons from the British and Dutch public sector. Government Information Quarterly, 28(3), pp.320-328.
Cable, V., 2013. Transparency & trust: enhancing the transparency of UK company ownership and increasing trust in UK business. IDBR, Retrieved November, 10
Alaaraj, H. and Ibrahim, D.F.W., 2014. The mediating effect of employee’s trust on egovernment and good governance in the public sector of developing countries. International Journal of Learning and Development, 4(3), pp.92-103.
Al-Busaidy, M.M., 2011. Evaluating the institutional factors affecting e-government implementation (Doctoral dissertation, Brunel University, School of Information Systems, Computing and Mathematics).
Alaaraj, H. and Hassan, S., 2014. Developing SWOT/TOWS Strategic Matrix for Egovernment in Lebanon. IJMRD, UUM, Malaysia.
Alaaraj, H, 2015, the mediating effect of employee’s trust on e-government and good governance in the public sector of developing countries, [e-thesis], UUM, Malaysia
Al-Khouri, A.M. and Bachlaghem, M., 2011. Towards federated e-identity management across GCC–A solution’s framework. Global Journal of Strategies & Governance, 4(1), pp.30-49.
Rufín, R., Bélanger, F., Molina, C. M., Carter, L., & Figueroa, J. C. S. (2014). A cross-cultural comparison of electronic government adoption in Spain and the USA. International Journal of Electronic Government Research (IJEGR), 10(2), 43-59.
Deloitte Research, 2000. At the Dawn of e-Government: The Citizen as Customer. Deloitte Consulting.
Chadwick, A. and May, C., 2003. Interaction between States and Citizens in the Age of the Internet: “e?Government” in the United States, Britain, and the European Union.Governance, 16(2), pp.271- 300.
Marche, S. and Mcniven, J.D, 2003, ‘e-government and e-governance: the future isn’t what it used to be,’ Canadian journal of administrative sciences-revue comedienne des sciences de l administration, vol. 20, 1, mar, pp 74-86.
Al-Adawi, Z., Yousafzai, S. and Pallister, J., 2005, September. Conceptual model of citizen adoption of e-government. In The Second International Conference on Innovations in Information Technology (IIT’05) (pp. 1-10)
Relly, J. E., & Sabharwal, M. (2009). Perceptions of transparency of government policymaking: A cross-national study. Government Information Quarterly, 26(1), 148-157.
Alkhuwaylidee, A. R. (2019). Extended Unified Theory Acceptance and Use Technology (UTAUT) for E-Learning. Journal of Computational and Theoretical Nanoscience, 16(3), 845-852.
Cody-Allen, E., & Kishore, R. (2006). An extension of the UTAUT model with e-quality, trust, and satisfaction constructs. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2006 ACM SIGMIS CPR conference on computer personnel research: Forty four years of computer personnel research: achievements, challenges & the future.
Nanayakkara, C., & Widdett, D. (2005). A model of user acceptance of e-learning technology: A case study of a polytechnic in New Zealand. The fourth international conference on information system technology and applications. New Zealand, 180-189.
Chau, P. Y. K., & Hu, P. J. H. (2002). Investigating healthcare professionals' decisions to accept telemedicine technology: An empirical test of competing theories. Information & Management, 39(4), 297-311.
Friedrich, H.F., & Hron, A. (2010). Factors influencing pupils' acceptance of an e-learning system for secondary schools. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 42, 63-78.
Elaiza, O. N., & Geri, N. (2008). Easy as e-mail? Probing the slow adoption of an online assignment submission system. Proceedings of the Chais conference on instructional technologies research 2008, 94-101.
Marchewka, J., Liu, C., & Kostiwa, K. (2007). An application of the UTAUT model for understanding student perceptions using course management software. Communications of the IIMA, 7(2), 93-104.
Sumak, B., Hericko, M., Polancic, G., & Pusnik, M. (2010). Investigation of e-learning system acceptance using UTAUT. International Journal of Engineering Education 26(6), 1327-1342.
Hermans, R., Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., & Valcke, M. (2008). The impact of primary school teachers’ educational beliefs on the classroom use of computers. Computers & education, 51(4), 1499-1509.
Sahin, I., & Shelley, M. (2008). Considering students’ perceptions: The distance education student satisfaction model. Educational Technology & Society, 11(3), 216–223.
Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., & Koestner, R. (2008). Reflections on self-determination theory. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 49(3), 257.
Hermans, C. M., Haytko, D. L., & Stenerson, M.B. (2009) Student satisfaction in web enhanced learning environments. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 1, 296-304.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M., David, G. & David, F, 2003, user acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view, miss quarterly 27(3):425–478.
Algharibi, A. J., & Arvanitis, T. N. (2011). Adapting the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) as a tool for validating user needs on the implementation of e-trial software systems. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 25th BCS Conference on Human-Computer Interaction.
Nanayakkara, C., & Widdett, D. (2005). A model of user acceptance of e-learning technology: A case study of a polytechnic in New Zealand. The fourth international conference on information system technology and applications. New Zealand, 180-189.
Chau, P. Y. K., & Hu, P. J. H. (2002). Investigating healthcare professionals' decisions to accept telemedicine technology: An empirical test of competing theories. Information & Management, 39(4), 297-311.
Friedrich, H.F., & Hron, A. (2010). Factors influencing pupils' acceptance of an e-learning system for secondary schools. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 42, 63-78.
Elaiza, O. N., & Geri, N. (2008). Easy as e-mail? Probing the slow adoption of an online assignment submission system. Proceedings of the Chais conference on instructional technologies research 2008, 94-101.
Marchewka, J., Liu, C., & Kostiwa, K. (2007). An application of the UTAUT model for understanding student perceptions using course management software. Communications of the IIMA, 7(2), 93-104.
Sumak, B., Hericko, M., Polancic, G., & Pusnik, M. (2010). Investigation of e-learning system acceptance using UTAUT. International Journal of Engineering Education 26(6), 1327-1342.
Hermans, R., Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., & Valcke, M. (2008). The impact of primary school teachers’ educational beliefs on the classroom use of computers. Computers & education, 51(4), 1499-1509.
Sahin, I., & Shelley, M. (2008). Considering students’ perceptions: The distance education student satisfaction model. Educational Technology & Society, 11(3), 216–223.
Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., & Koestner, R. (2008). Reflections on self-determination theory. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 49(3), 257.
Hermans, C. M., Haytko, D. L., & Stenerson, M.B. (2009) Student satisfaction in web enhanced learning environments. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 1, 296-304.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M., David, G. & David, F, 2003, user acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view, miss quarterly 27(3):425–478.
Algharibi, A. J., & Arvanitis, T. N. (2011). Adapting the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) as a tool for validating user needs on the implementation of e-trial software systems. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 25th BCS Conference on Human-Computer Interaction.
Lai, D. C.-F., Lai, I. K.-W., & Jordan, E. (2009). An extended UTAUT model for the study of negative user adoption behaviours of mobile commerce. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Electronic Business.
Barua, M., 2012. E-governance adoption in government organization of India. International Journal of Managing Public Sector Information and Communication Technologies, 3(1), p.1.
Delone, W.H. and Mclean, E.R., 2004. Measuring e-commerce success: Applying the DeLone & McLean information systems success model. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 9(1), pp.31-47.
Hung, S.-Y., Chang, C.-M., & Yu, T.-J. (2006). Determinants of user acceptance of the e-Government services: The case of online tax filing and payment system. Government Information Quarterly, 23(1), 97-122.
Davis F., Bagozzi R., & Warshaw P. (1992). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computer in the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(14), 1111-1132.
Naor, O., & Geri, N. (2008). Easy as e-mail? Probing the slow adoption of an online assignment submission system. Proceedings of the Chais conference on instructional technologies research 2008, 5, 94-101.
ALEH, A. A., ALKHUWAYLIDEE, A. R. and THANGIAH, M. (2021) ‘E-GOVERNMENT SYSTEM FRAMEWORK SUCCESSFUL FACTORS’, 99(2).
Mohan, Nawaf Rashid, Et Al. "Using Cloud–Based Web Application For Universityes: A Case Of University Of Technology In Iraq." Advances In Computing 4.1 (2014): 15-17.
Ahmed, Alkhuwaylidee, And Alhaj Saleh Almahdy. "Syrian E-Government Framework Toward Government Excellence Servic." 2019. 2019.
Razzaq,Arif, And Ali A. Mohammed. "Cloud Erp In Malaysia: Benefits, Challenges, And Opportunities." International Journal 9.5 (2020).
AA Saleh, AR Alkhuwaylidee, M Thangiah . Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1963 (1), 012161.
AA Saleh, AR Alkhuwaylidee, M Thangiah. Annals of the Romanian Society for Cell Biology, 19977-19989
AA Saleh, IFT Alyaseen, Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics 10 (6), 3460-3470 , Successful factors determining the significant relationship between e-governance system and government operational excellence.
