The Phenomenology of Dhu’l-Qarnayn’s Community Engagement: A Theoretical Model for Environmental, Social and Corporate Governance (ESG) Sustainability

Authors

  • Saheed Busari IIUM
  • Noor Mohammad Osmani International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31436/ijrcs.v5i2.250

Keywords:

Dhu’l-Qarnayn, Community Engagement, Environmental, Social and Corporate Governance (ESG) Sustainability, Phenomenology

Abstract

Government and non-government agencies are concerned in recent times about the sustainability of socio-economic and environmental resources because the continuous survival of humanity relies strongly on the extent of ensuring a sustainable economy, society and environment. Sustainability studies have suggested the dire need to promote the implementation of environmental, social and corporate governance (ESG) to enhance and guarantee the interests of stakeholders, such as customers, employees, investors and the entire ecosystem. However, a community engagement programme is distinct from community service as the former empowers the society for sustainability, similar to what Dhu’l-Qarnayn did to enhance socio-economic and environmental protection for the people of a territory. Through a phenomenology approach to the exegeses of textual sources of Dhu’l-Qarnayn, this article explicates how the implication of community engagement sustains the people of that time and its relevance to contemporary society. This article uses qualitative method based on a doctrinal approach to explore the historical implication of Dhu’l-Qarnayn’s community engagement approach and its application to modern ESG sustainability. This study found that the community engagement approach by Dhu’l-Qarnayn is a sustainable empowerment model, rather than mere services to the people for free or in exchange for socio-economic and environmental benefits. The article identifies knowledge, wisdom, spirituality, engagement and empowerment as the fundamental principles used by Dhu’l-Qarnayn towards sustainable ESG in modern society. This study suggests the need to further conduct an empirical study on the understanding and application of sustainable ESG by religious institutions.

References

Al-Bagwī, M. S. A. M. A.-H. bin M. (1997). Mualim Tanzīl fī Tafsīr al-Quran. Dar Ihya Turath Al-Arabi.

Alhazmi, A. A., & Kaufmann, A. (2022). Phenomenological Qualitative Methods Applied to the Analysis of Cross-Cultural Experience in Novel Educational Social Contexts. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.785134.

Al-Qurtubī, M. A. (2006). Al-Jāmiʻu Li Aḥkām Al-Qurān (A. M. Aturuqi, Ed.; 1st ed.). Al-Risālah Publisher.

At-Tabari, M. I. J. bin Y. (2001). Jāmiu Al-Bayan an Ta’wīl (Abdul Sanad hassan Yamama, Ed.; 1st ed.). Markaz Buhus wa Dirasat Al-Arabiyyah.

Boffo R. and Patalano. (2020). ESG Investing: Practices, Progress and Challenges.

Bruce, D. (2008). How sustainable are we? In EMBo reports (Vol. 9).

Christens, B. D., & Zeldin, S. (2016). Community Engagement. In Encyclopedia of Adolescence (pp. 1–11). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32132-5_24-2.

Davidsen, A. S. (2013). Phenomenological Approaches in Psychology and Health Sciences. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 10(3), 318–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2011.608466.

Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance and Investment, 5(4), 210–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2015.1118917.

Henisz, W., Koller, T., & Nuttall, R. (2019). Five ways that ESG creates value Getting your environmental, social, and governance (ESG) proposition right links to higher value creation. Here’s why.

Ibn Kathīr, bin Umar, I. (1997). Tafsīr-al-Qurān-al-‘Azīm (S. bin M. Al-Salāmah, Ed.; 2nd ed.). Dār Ṭībah.

Ibn Qayyim Al-Jawziyyah Muhammad bin Abu Bakri bin Ayub. (1432). Ighathah Al-lahfan fi Masayid As-Shaitan (1st ed., Vol. 2). Dar Alam al-Fawaid.

Ismail bin Umar Al-Fida Hafith bin Kathir. (1990). Al-Bidayah wa Nihaayah (Vol. 2). Maktabah Al-Maarif.

Kiehne, D.-O. (2019). Environmental, social and corporate governance (ESG)-also an innovation driver? Patent Valuation View project Innovation Management View project. https://www.cooperativepatentclassification.org/cpcScheme.

Kong, F. (2022). How to realize the better integrated disaster risk governance by public financial investment in China? Sustainable Environment, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/27658511.2021.2007592.

Majmau Al-Buhus al-Islamiyyah Al-Azhar. (1992). At-Tafsir Al-Waseet lil Quran Al-Karim (3rd ed., Vol. 2). Al-Mashaf As-Sharif.

Nur Asma AB Aziz & Muhd Norzam Jamian. (2016). ArtikelJurnalMelayu-AkhlakPemimpindalamHikayatIskandarZulkarnanin.

Saudi, A., Tbakhi, A., & Amr, S. S. (2007). Arab and Muslim Physicians and Scholars Ibn Al-Haytham: Father of Modern Optics. In 3579 · Abdelghani.Tbakhi@hdgh.org Ann Saudi Med (Vol. 27, Issue 6). www.saudiannals.net.

Schlake, M. (2015). Community Engagement: Nine Principles. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/agecon_cornhusker.

van der Waldt, G. (n.d.). The Role of Government in Sustainable Development: Towards a Conceptual and Analytical Framework for Scientific Inquiry Local Governance View project Project Management in Government View project. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/306510560.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-30

How to Cite

Busari, S., & Noor Mohammad Osmani. (2022). The Phenomenology of Dhu’l-Qarnayn’s Community Engagement: A Theoretical Model for Environmental, Social and Corporate Governance (ESG) Sustainability. IIUM Journal of Religion and Civilisational Studies, 5(2), 143–157. https://doi.org/10.31436/ijrcs.v5i2.250