Gender Issues and the Distorted Narrative in Women Leadership in China: The Case of Empress Dowager Cixi (1861-1908)

Authors

  • Muhamad Daniel Ibrahim Yaacob Universiti Sains Malaysia
  • Siti Zuliha Razali School of Social Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia
  • Muhammad Febriansyah School of Social Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31436/id.v31i2.1976

Abstract

Throughout history, the controversial Empress Dowager Cixi has been portrayed as a cruel and ineffective leader, despite contradicting evidences. This study assesses the narratives that vilified her via library and historical research methods, and analysed using critical discourse analysis. The Qing’s social system became an instrument of prejudice and discrimination which fostered a gender-biased mindset and disparity that was used against Qing women like Cixi. This scenario paved the way for prejudiced and fabricated narratives about Cixi written by scholars and foes, and were accepted and cited in the vast majority of subsequent English historical and scholarly works, which are still regarded as accurate today. The study discovers that Cixi’s contribution can be traced through China’s political, development, and social sectors, such as in the empowerment of Qing women. This article examines Cixi under the theme of gender, and accentuated how gender has become a crucial key in creating a massive impact on her life and how Qing’s societal system itself becomes a tool of suppression, bias and discrimination towards Qing women, specifically Cixi. This article bridges a major research gap in gender and political studies by filling in the studies on historical women’s leadership. Cixi broke down gender barriers to reform China, and she should be honoured for her contributions to society.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Siti Zuliha Razali, School of Social Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia

Siti Zuliha Razali is a senior lecturer at the School of Social Sciences in Universiti Sains Malaysia. She received her undergraduate degree from the International Islamic University of Malaysia and her MA and PhD degrees from the University of Denver, USA. Her research interests and expertise span within the disciplines of Political Science and International Studies with concentration on International and Comparative Politics. She has published a number of papers in accredited journals and chapters in books. She has also participated in a range of forums and seminars at both the local and international levels. Currently, Siti Zuliha is conducting research on the status of Religion and its significance as a variable in the discipline of International Relations. She is also the editorial board member of the SINERGI journal published by Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia and a reviewer in the Voice of Academia journal published by Universiti Utara Malaysia.

Muhammad Febriansyah , School of Social Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia

Muhammad Febriansyah is a political scientist and a senior lecturer at the School of Social Sciences at Universiti Sains Malaysia. He obtained his undergraduate degree from Pasundan University and received his MA and PhD from the Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. He was invited as a visiting fellow at the Institute of Asia Pacific Studies (IAPS) in the University of Nottingham- Malaysia Campus. His research interest and expertise fall within Indonesian Politics, Social Movements, and Youth Politics which has published many papers on contemporary politics including “Competing not complementing: KPU, Bawaslu, and the dynamic of election monitoring in PEMILU 2019” which was published in the Asian Journal of Political Science. He also contributed to a book chapter in Asia in Transition book series entitled “Alternative or Mainstream? Malay Independent Book Publishing in Malaysia

Downloads

Published

2023-12-28

How to Cite

Yaacob, M. D. I., Razali, S. Z., & Febriansyah , M. . (2023). Gender Issues and the Distorted Narrative in Women Leadership in China: The Case of Empress Dowager Cixi (1861-1908) . Intellectual Discourse, 31(2). https://doi.org/10.31436/id.v31i2.1976