The The Cues Constitute to Deception in Islamic-Websites Text and Design
Findings from The Interview with Experts
Keywords:
Cues; Deception; Islamic website; Text; Design; Interview; ExpertsAbstract
Deception in the Islamic websites is viewed as manipulation of the truth either by hiding truthful information or showing false information on the Islamic Website. In response to this, this study evaluates cues to deception in the Islamic Websites text and design from the point of view of the experts. This study uses interviews with the experts to gain insights from the cues to deception in text and design. Prior sto conducting the interviews, the interview instruments were developed based on the findings of the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) that was conducted and published earlier. To this end, there were six experts involving three from the Islamic background, and the other three from the Human Computer Interaction (HCI) background to evaluate the cues derived from the SLR. This paper presented nine heuristics (themes) generated from the transcript data, four heuristics were from textual content and five heuristics from the design. Each of these heuristics were divided into sub-categories comprising the cues to deception. The finding shows that there were many cues to deception on the website that claimed to be Islamic, and the most deceiving content found on the Internet were from the websites that discusses Prophet Muhammad PBUH biography
References
Aliyu, M., & Mahmud, M. (2013). A Preliminary Investigation of Islamic Websites’ Design Features That Influence Use: A Proposed Model. The Electronic Journal on Information Systems in Developing Countries Http://Www.Ejisdc.Org, 1–21.
Aliyu, M., Mahmud, M., & Nassr, R. M. (2013). An Empirical Investigation of Factors Influencing Islamic Websites Use and Their Positive Impact from Muslim User Perception. Asia-Pacific Journal of Information Technology and Multimedia, 2(2), 13–26.
Badi, M. J. (2013). Evaluation of Multimedia Elements in Islamic Websites Element [Master Dissertation]. International Islamic University Malaysia.
Banerjee, S., & Chua, A. Y. K. (2014). A theoretical framework to identify authentic online reviews. 4 Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 38(5). http://hdl.handle.net/10220/25873%0A©
Baru, R., Hadzrullathfi, S., Omar, S., & Ibrahim, B. (2017). MALAYSIAN JOURNAL FOR ISLAMIC STUDIES IDENTIFYING FALSE HADITH GUIDELINES JILID 1 2017. Malaysian Journal for Islamic Studies, 62–73.
Bradley, E. H., Curry, L. A., & Devers, K. J. (2007). Qualitative data analysis for health services research: Developing taxonomy, themes, and theory. Health Services Research, 42(4), 1758–1772. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00684.x
Buller, D., & Burgoon, J. (1996). Interpersonal Deception Theory.
Catalina L, T., & Hancock, J. T. (2010). Reading between the Lines: Linguistic Cues to Deception in Online Dating Profiles. ACM, 5–8.
Chapman, N., & Chapman, J. (2006). Web Design. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, the Atrium, Southern gate, Chichesters, West Sussex PO198SQ, England.
Choi, W., & Stvilia, B. (2015). Web credibility assessment: Conceptualization, operationalization, variability, and models. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(12), 2399–2414. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23543
Connell, C. A. (2012). Linguistic Cues to Deception [Master of Arts in Communication Douglas, State University]. https://theses.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-05092012-160131/unrestricted/Connell_CA_T_2012rev.pdf
DePaulo, B. M., Lindsay, J. J., Malone, B. E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., & Cooper, H. (2003). Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129(1), 74–118. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.129.1.74
Edgar, T. W., & Manz, D. O. (2017). Research Methods for Cyber Security.
Elkins, A., Zafeiriou, S., Burgoon, J., & Pantic, M. (2014). Unobtrusive Deception Detection. Handbook of Affective Computing, 503–515. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199942237.013.037
Emma Nuraihan Mior Ibrahim, Noor, N. L. Md., & Mehad, S. (2008). Trust or distrust in the web-mediated information environment (W-MIE): A perspective of online Muslim users. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 22(5), 523–547. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410390910993527
Grazioli, S. (2004). Where did they go wrong? An analysis of the failure of knowledgeable Internet consumers to detect deception over the internet. Group Decision and Negotiation, 13(2), 149–172. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:GRUP.0000021839.04093.5d
Hancock, J. T. (2007). digital deception. In Chapter for the Oxford Handbook of Internet Psychology. Chapter for the Oxford Handbook of Internet Psychology.
Hartwig, M. (2005). Interrogating to detect deception and truth: Effects of strategic use of evidence.
Holtskog, H. (2017). Defining the Characteristics of an Expert in a Social Context Through Subjective Evaluation. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 8(3), 1014–1031. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-015-0312-1
Ibrahim, E. N. M., Izzati, W. N. I., Hamzah, W., Taslim, J., & Adnan, W. A. W. (2010). Evaluating trust elements in the context of Islamic based informational websites. Proceedings - 2010 International Conference on User Science and Engineering, i-USEr 2010, 268–272. https://doi.org/10.1109/IUSER.2010.5716764
Ishak, M. S. B. H., & Solihin, S. M. (2012). Islam and Media. Asian Social Science, 8(7), 263–269. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v8n7p263
Jennifer, K. (2017). What is Web Content? ThoughtCo, March 15, 2017. thoughtco.com/what-is-web-content-3466787
Kitchenham, B. (2004). Procedures for performing systematic reviews. Keele, UK, Keele University, 33(TR/SE-0401), 28. https://doi.org/10.1.1.122.3308
Mahmud, M., & Abubakar, A. (2014). Investigating the Act of Deception in Online-Islamic Content. 3rd International Conference on User Science and Engineering (i-USEr) Investigating, 242–247.
Masip, J., Garrido, E., & Herrero, C. (2004). Defining deception. 20, 147–171.
Mehad, S. (2010). Muslim User Interface Evaluation Framework (Muslim-UI) for Islamic Genre Website: A Quantitative Approach. Proceeding 3rd International Conference on ICT4M 2010 Muslim.
Merriam-Webster. (2021). Definition of Cue. Https://Www.Merriam-Webster.Com/Dictionary/Cue.
Mohamed, F. A., Sheikh, M., Aziz, A., & Zulkifli, Z. (2021). Cues To Deception in Islamic Websites Text-Based Content and Design: A Systematic Literature Review. In International Journal on Perceptive and Cognitive Computing (IJPCC) (Vol. 7, Issue 1).
Mohamed, R. (2016). Developing Text-Based Measurable Reliability Factors for Islamic Websites [Thesis].
Mughal, M. A. (2016). Media and Guidance from the Holy Qur’an and Sunnah. SSRN, 283. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2731470
Muhammad Khurram Khan, Y. M. A. (2013). The Holy Quran Digitization: Challenges and Concerns. Life Science Journal 2013;10(2), 10(2).
Najiyah, I., Susanti, S., Riana, D., Wahyudi, M., Nusa, S., & Jakarta, M. (2017). Hadith Degree Classification for Shahih Hadith Identification Web Based.
Nassr, R. M. (2016). Developing Text-Based Measurable Reliability Factors For Islamic Websites By Rasheed (Issue March). International Islamic University Malaysia.
Newman, M. L., Pennebaker, J. W., Berry, D. S., & Richards, J. M. (2003). Lying words: predicting deception from linguistic cues. Society Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(5), 665–675. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203251529
Othman, S. S., Hassan, F., Sabri, S. A., & Nayan, L. M. (2020). Fake News from The Islamic Perspective. MIMBAR: Jurnal
Sosial Dan Pembangunan, 36(1), 159–168. https://doi.org/10.29313/mimbar.v36i1.5467
Picornell, I. (2013). Cues to deception in a textual narrative context: lying in written witness statements. http://eprints.aston.ac.uk/19316/
Rahman, A. A., Hashim, N. H., & Mustafa, H. (2015). Muslims in cyberspace: exploring factors influencing online religious engagements in Malaysia. Media Asia, 42(1–2), 61–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/01296612.2015.1072343
Saad, S., Salim, N., & Zainal, H. (2009). Islamic knowledge ontology creation. 2009 International Conference for Internet Technology and Secured Transactions, (ICITST), November 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICITST.2009.5402635
Saleh, A. G. (2015). Assessment of the Quality of Hadith Information on the Internet. Journal of Information and Knowledge Management, 6(2).
Toma, C. L., & Hancock, J. T. (2012). What Lies Beneath: The Linguistic Traces of Deception in Online Dating Profiles. Journal of Communication, 62(1), 78–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01619.x
Vrij, A., Edward, K., Roberts, K. P., & Bull, R. (2000). Detecting deceit via analysis of verbal and nonverbal behavior.
Wan Khairul Aiman Wan Mokhtar, Wan Mohd Khairul, Firdaus Wan Khairuldin, Abdul Malik Mohammad, & Mohd
Mustaffami Imas. (2013). The authoritativeness of sunnah in the development of Islamic worldview research. International Journal of Education and Research, 1(11), 2201–6333. www.ijern.com
Wan-chik, R. Z. (2014). Islamic and Quranic information on the Web: Information Retrieval challenges and u ser’ s preferences. 2nd International Conference on Islamic Applications in Computer Science and Technology, 12-13 Oct 2014, Amman, Jordan Islamic, 12–13.
Wan-chik, R. Z. (2015). Information Credibility Assessment of Islamic and Quranic Information on the Information Credibility Assessment of Islamic and Quranic Information on the Web. January. https://doi.org/10.1145/2701126.2701185
Yousif, A. F. (2006). IT in the 21st Century: JURNAL PEMIKIRAN ALTERNATIF KEPENDIDIKAN, 11(3), 1–13.
Yusof, N. (2016). The Credibility of Islamic Religious Institutional Websites in Malaysia. Jurnal Komunikasi, Malaysian Journal of Communication, 32(2), 82–104. https://doi.org/10.17576/jkmjc-2016-3202-05
Zhou, L. (2003). A Longitudinal Analysis of Language Behavior of Deception in E-mail. Conference Paper in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, January. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44853-5
Zhou, L., Burgoon, J., & Twitchell, D. (2004). A comparison of classification methods for predicting deception in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Management Information Systems, 20(4), 139–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2004.11045779
