Means of Modern Criminal Evidence for Testimony: A Comparative Study between Sunnah and Libyan Law

وسائل الإثبات الجنائي الحديثة للشهادة: دراسة مقارنة بين السنة والقانون الليبي

Authors

  • Amer Ali Mohammad Aljadi MA Researcher, Department of Quran and Sunnah Studies, AHAS KIRKHS, International Islamic University Malaysia
  • Saadeldin Mansour Gasmelsid Associate Professor, Department of Quran and Sunnah Studies, AHAS KIRKHS, International Islamic University Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31436/ijfus.v8i1.334

Keywords:

Modern Methods, Testimony, Criminal and Legal Evidence

Abstract

The researchers discuss about an important topic through which they shed light on the effects of modern means of testimony on Libyan society in light of the Sunnah of the Prophet. This study aims to clarify the concept of testimony and its features, the position of modern means of proof in the Sunnah of the Prophet, and the effects of these means on Libyan law. This study approaches to compare different elements to understand the differences and similarities between them. The central problem of this topic is the modern development of means of proof for testimony and its impact on the Sharīʽah courts. Its value and the efforts of the Libyan legislator in these means are demonstrated. We also presented the extent of the authenticity of modern means of testimony in the Sunnah of the Prophet, following in this the most accurate writings about the means of proof, and relied on the Sunnah, following the method of reasoning according to the companion and jurist ʽAbd Allāh bin ʽUmar, may Allah be pleased with them both. We explained the modern means of testimony in the Prophetic Sunnah and its pillars in terms of criminal and Sharīʽah proof, then we explained the way in which these means were used in terms of criminal and Sharīʽah proof. We also explained the efforts of the Libyan jurists towards these means, and then we proceeded to detail in talking about them according to the Libyan legislator in terms of Proof.  Then we talked about its characteristics, conditions, scope of proof, and its validity in proof. Applied examples of these means have been mentioned. The most prominent feature of this study is that it shed light on the types of means of proof in the Sunnah of the Prophet, and it has contributed to reviewing the place of proof by testimony in Libyan society.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Abū Zayd, Dunyā Ismāʿīl Muḥammad. (2013). Mulazimat Māddat Qānūn al-Ithbāt.

al-Azadī, Abū Bakr Muḥammad bin al-Ḥasan bin Durayd. (1987). Jamharat al-Lughah. al-Ṭabʿah al-Ūlá. Bayrūt: Dār al-ʿIlm lil-Malāyīn.

al-Bukhārī, Abū ʿAbd Allāh Muḥammad bin Ismāʿīl bin Ibrāhīm bin al-Mughīrah ibn Bardizbah. (2001). Ṣaḥīḥ al-Jāmiʿ. al-Ṭabʿah al-Ūlá. Bayrūt: Dār Ṭawq al-Najāh.

al-Fārāhīdī, Abū ʿAbd al-Raḥmān al-Khalīl bin Aḥmad. (2010). Kitāb al-ʿAyn. al-Qāhirah: Dār wa Maktabat al-Hilāl.

al-Kharshah, Muḥammad Amīn. (2011). Mashrūʿīyat al-Ṣawt wa-al-Ṣūrah fī al-Ithbāt al-Jināʾī (no edition). ʿAmmān: Dār al-Thaqāfah.

al-Mullā, Sāmī Ṣādiq. (1986). Iʿtirāf al-Muttaham. al-Ṭabʿah al-Thānīyah. Miṣr: al-Qāhirah.

al-Qurṭubī, Abū ʿAbd Allāh Muḥammad bin Aḥmad al-Anṣārī. (1964). Al-Jāmiʿ li-Aḥkām al-Qurʾān al-Ṭabʿah al-Thānīyah. Aḥmad al-Bardūnī (Taḥqīq). al-Qāhirah: Dār al-Kutub al-Miṣrīyah.

al-Rāzī, Muḥammad bin ʿUmar. (1987). Al-Firāsah Dalīlaka ilá Maʿrifat Akhlāq al-Nās wa Ṭabāʾiʿihim Kaʾannahum Kitābun Miftūḥ. al-Ṭabʿah al-Ūlá. al-Qāhirah: Maktabat al-Qurʾān.

al-Sijistānī, Abū Dāwūd Sulaymān bin al-Ashʿath al-Azadī. (2010). Sunan Abī Dāwūd (no edition). Bayrūt: al-Maktabah al-ʿAṣrīyah Ṣaydā.

al-Zaylaʿī, ʿUthmān bin ʿAlī Fakhr al-Dīn. (1896). Tabayyun al-Ḥaqāʾiq Sharḥ Kanz al-Daqāʾiq wa Ḥāshiyat al-Shalabī. al-Ṭabʿah al-Ūlá. al-Qāhirah: al-Maṭbaʿah al-Kubrá bi-Wulāq.

Awḥaybīyah, ʿAbd Allāh. Sharḥ Qānūn al-Ijrāʾāt al-Jazāʾīyah fī al-Taḥqīq al-Nihāʾī wa-al-Muḥākamah (2018). al-Jazāʾir: Dār Hūmah.

Ibn al-Qayyim, Muḥammad bin Abī Bakr. (1985). Al-Firāsah. al-Ṭabʿah al-Ūlá. al-Qāhirah: al-Maktabah al-Iskandarīyah.

Ibn Fāris, Aḥmad bin Fāris bin Zakarīyāʾ al-Qazwīnī. (1989). Muʿjam Maqāyīs al-Lughah. al-Ṭabʿah al-Ūlá. Taḥqīq: ʿAbd al-Salām Muḥammad Hārūn. Bayrūt: Dār al-Fikr.

Ibn Humām, Kamāl al-Dīn. (1970). Fatḥ al-Qadīr ʿalá al-Hidāyah. al-Ṭabʿah al-Ūlá. Lubnān: Dār al-Fikr.

Ibn Manẓūr, Muḥammad bin Mukarram. (1994). Lisān al-ʿArab. al-Ṭabʿah al-Thālithah. Bayrūt: Dār Ṣādir.

ʿImrān, Wafāʾ. (2009). Al-Wasāʾil al-ʿIlmīyah al-Ḥadīthah fī al-Ithbāt al-Jināʾī. al-Jazāʾir: Qasanṭīnah.

Khālid, Kūthar Aḥmad. (2007). Al-Ithbāt al-Jināʾī bi-al-Wasāʾil al-ʿIlmīyah al-Ḥadīthah. al-ʿIrāq: Arbīl.

Khaṭṭāb, Khālid ʿAwnī. Dawr Ajhizat al-Taṣwīr al-Ḥadīthah fī al-Ithbāt al-Jināʾī. Majallat al-Rāfiḍayn lil-Ḥuqūq. al-Mujallad (15). al-ʿAdad (55). al-Sanah (2017)

Lajnah Mukawwanah min ʿIddat ʿUlamāʾ wa Fuqahāʾ fī al-Khilāfah al-ʿUthmānīyah. (2010). Majallat al-Aḥkām al-ʿAdlīyah.

Markaz al-Dirāsāt wa-al-Maʿlūmāt al-Qurʾānīyah, (2017). Mawsuʿat al-Tafsīr al-Maʾthūr. al-Ṭabʿah al-Thānīyah. Taḥqīq: Musāʿid bin Sulaymān al-Ṭayyār. Bayrūt: Dār Ibn Ḥazm.

Markūs, Sulaymān. (1981). Mabādiʾ al-Dalīl wa-Ijra'ātuhu fī al-Masā'il al-Madanīyah, Lubnān: ʿĀlam al-Kutub, al-Ṭibʿah al-Ūlá.

Muslim, Ibn al-Ḥajjāj al-Naysābūrī. (2010). Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim. Bayrūt: Dār Iḥyāʾ al-Turāth al-Kutub al-ʿArabīyah.

Ṣaqr, Nabīl. (2005). Al-Ithbāt fī al-Mawād al-Jazāʾīyah al-Ṭabʿah al-Ūlá. al-Jazāʾir: Dār al-Hudá.

Sikkīkur, Muḥammad ʿAlī. (2008). Taḥqīq al-Daʿwá al-Jināʾīyah wa Ithbātuhā fī Ḍawʾ al-Tashrīʿ wa-al-Fiqh wa-al-Qaḍāʾ. Miṣr: Dār al-Fikr al-Jāmiʿī.

Ṣubḥī, Najm Muḥammad. Sharḥ Qānūn al-Ijrāʾāt al-Jināʾīyah (2006). ʿAmmān: Dār al-Thaqāfah.

Published

31-01-2024

How to Cite

Aljadi, A. A. M., & Gasmelsid, S. M. (2024). Means of Modern Criminal Evidence for Testimony: A Comparative Study between Sunnah and Libyan Law: وسائل الإثبات الجنائي الحديثة للشهادة: دراسة مقارنة بين السنة والقانون الليبي. International Journal of Fiqh and Usul Al-Fiqh Studies, 8(1), 72–85. https://doi.org/10.31436/ijfus.v8i1.334

Issue

Section

Arabic Articles