TORNADO FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENT COST ANALYSIS FOR GREEN PROJECT IN MALAYSIA
Keywords:
Green Development, Development Cost, Qualitative Method, and Tornado AnalysisAbstract
In Malaysia, green building has currently become significant as sustainable development. Most of the established developers have incorporated sustainable development in green building projects. Due to the passive evolutionary effects of real estate on the environment and human health, the development and promotion of green buildings for a sustainable environment have become a market trend to attract buyers in this country. Thereby, the qualitative approach methodology is adopted in this study, where a case study has been selected to observe the significant risk impact on the development cost. An in-depth analysis was carried out using a feasibility study, and a discounted cash flow was performed. The simulation runs using tornado analysis to detect the most significant risk affected by development cost. The results indicate that the building cost, mechanical and electrical works, and piling works are the highest risk in developing a green building. Therefore, the client should take extra precautions in green development to monitor the affected cost to minimise project delay and achieve the project objectives. A tornado analysis makes decisionmaking more explicit by the client. It enables the decision-maker to analyse the risk contributing to the development cost and make more effective decisions.
References
Green Building Index (GBI), (April 2009).
Ahiaga Dagbui, D., & Smith, S. (2014). Rethinking Construction Cost Overruns : Cognition, Learning and estimation. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 19, 38-54.
Atherton, E., French, N., & Gabrielli, L. (2008). Decision Theory and Real Estate Development : A Note on uncertainty. Journal of European Real Estate Research, 1(2), 162-182.
B., F. (2014). "What you Should Know About Magaprojects and Why: An Overview. Project Management Journal, 45, 6-19.
Cartlidge, D. (2009). Quantity Surveyor's Pocket Book: Elsevier.
Chau, C. K., Leung, T. M., & Ng.W.Y. (2015). A review on Life Cycle Assessment, Life Cycle Energy Assessment and Life Cycle Carbon Emissions Asssessment on Buildings. Applied Energy, 143, 395-413.
Finkbener, M., Schau, E. M., Lehmann, A., & Traverso, M. (2010). Towards Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment. Sustainability, 2. doi:10.3390/su2103309
Halil, F. M., Ismail, H., Hasim, M. S., & Hashim, H. (2020). A conceptual Study on the Monte Carlo Simulation for Cost Forecasting in the Green Building Project Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 5(13), 75-81.
Huo, X., Yu, A. T. W., Wu, Z., & Jayanthn, W. M. (2020). Site Planning and Design of Green Residential Building Projects: Case Studies in China. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 27(2), 525-543.
Isaac, D. J., O'Leary, J., & Daley, M. (2010). Property Development:Appraisal and Finance: Palgrave Macmillan,Basingstoke.
J, S., Wilkinson, & Sayce, S. L. (2015). Developing Property Sustainable In. London and New York: Routledge,Taylor & Francis Group.
Kamaruddin, S. M., Mohd Rosmi, R., Muhamad Halil, F., Misni, A., & Marzukhi, M. A. (2020). User Awareness, Impediments and Proposed Iimprovements To The ONE STOP CENTRE (OSC) Online 3.0 System. Case Study: Municipal Counsel of Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia. PLANNING MALAYSIA, 18(14). doi:10.21837/pm.v18i14.830
Li, Y., Yang, L., He, B., & Zhao, D. (2014). Green Building in China: Needs Great Promotion Sustainable Cities and Society, 11, 1-6.
Lu, W., Tam, V. W. Y., & Du, H. C. a. L. (2020). A Holistic Review of Research on Carbon Emissions of Green Building Construction Industry. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 27, 1065 - 1092.
Luederitz, C., Long, D. J., & Von Wehrden, H. (2013). A systematic Review of Guiding principles for Sustainable Urban Neighborhood. Lanscape and Urban Planning, 118, 40-52.
Mun, J. (2015). Risk Simulator: Real Options Valuation.
Narayanaswami, S. (2017). Urban Transportation: Innovations in Infrastructure Plannin and Development. The International Journal of Logistic Management, 28(1), 150-169.
Nasrudin, N. a., George, A. I., Abdullah, Y. A., Marzukhi, M. A., Oliver Hoon Leh, L., & Rashid, K. (2020). Public Awareness and Acceptance Towards Transportation Low Carbon City Programme: A Comparison OF MBSA AND DBKL. PLANNING MALAYSIA, 18(14). doi:10.21837/pm.v18i14.821
Piaw, C. Y. (2012). Mastering Research Methods: McGraw-Hill (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd.
Sayce, S. L. (2015). Project Appraisal and the Triple Bottom Line: Routledge,Taylor & Francis Group.
Touny, A. S. E., Ibrahim, A. H., & Mohamad, H. H. (2021). An Integrated Sustainable Construction Project's Critical Success Factors (ISCFs). Sustainability, 13(15). doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158629
Yin, R. K. (1994). Case Study Research
Design and Methods (Vol. 5): SAGE Publications.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Faridah Muhamad Halil, Mohamad Sufian Hasim, Siti Mazuen Kamaruddin, Nasyairi Mat Nasir, Hafiszah Ismail
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Unported License.
Copyright & Creative Commons Licence
eISSN: 0128-0945 © Year. The Authors. Published for Malaysia institute of planner. This is an open-access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.
The authors hold the copyright without restrictions and also retain publishing rights without restrictions.
