The Indirect Impact of Liberalization on Detached (Luxury) Housing Market in Malaysia

Authors

  • Ema Izati Zull Kepili Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31436/ijema.v28i1.713

Keywords:

FDI, House price, Detached home, Malaysia, Liberalization

Abstract

Local demand for houses in Malaysia is different than by the international buyers due to the macroeconomic factors. The growing number of international buyers might also be caused by the liberalization policy in the real estate sector. By acknowledging the possible influence of external investment, the research objective of this study includes foreign direct investment (FDI) as a determinant for housing affordability in Malaysia. This study intends to estimate the long-run effect of FDI and house price on housing affordability by employing the Johansen Cointegration approach. The extension of this study is the inclusion of liberalization using the Channel Method. We observe the impact of liberalization on housing affordability in the presence of FDI. The results of this study i) suggest that liberalization has negatively affected housing affordability; clearly the openness of the real property sector has caused an influx of foreign buyers, pushing house prices beyond the locals’ affordability level; and ii) suggest that through FDI, liberalization has changed its sign to positive, signifying the presence of FDI has caused a higher degree of liberalization to influence a higher affordability level. It shows that the openness of the real estate sector has elevated the affordability level among Malaysians for the average house but not for the luxury segment. The results imply that those who benefit from buying luxury houses are not Malaysians. Locals who might previously afford to buy luxury houses were no longer able to do so due to affordability issues. As for financial institutions, unaffordability problem has caused them to offer credit facilities to the locals. Central authorities such as housing ministries are suggested to check whether the luxury segment is largely pushed by locals or foreigners. 

References

Abelson, P. “Affordable Housing: Concepts and Policies.†Economic Papers: A Journal of Applied Economics and Policy 28, no. 1 (2009): 27-38.

Boey, E. “Trends in the Malaysian Property Market.†2015. https://www.Edgeprop.My/Content/Trends-Malaysian-Proper ty-Market.

Dogan, E., K.N. Wong, and M.M. Yap. “Vertical and Horizontal Spill overs from Foreign Direct Investment: Evidence from Malaysian Manufacturing.†Asian Economic Papers 16, no. 3 (2017): 158-83.

Fadhil, M.A., andM.K. Almsafir. “The Role of FDI Inflows in Economic Growth in Malaysia (Time Series: 1975-2010).†Procedia Economics and Finance 23 (2015): 1558-66.

Nwuba, C.C., I.U. Kalu, and J.A. Umeh. “Determinants of Homeownership Affordability in Nigeria’s Urban Housing Markets.†International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis8, no. 2 (2015): 189-206.

Global Property Guide, “House Price Statistics In Malaysia.†Global Property Guide. 2018, https://www.Globalpropertyguide.Com /Asia/Malaysia.

Ismail, M.H.B., S.M.H.S. Khairuddin, and S.N.D.H.M. Ali. “The Housing Affordability Issues ofthe Middle Income Households Groups in Malaysia.†2016. http://ir.unikl.edu. my/jspui/handle /123456789/15086.

Johansen, S., and K. Juselius. “Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inference on Cointegration - With Applications to the Demand for Money.†Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 52, no. 2 (1990): 169-210.

Kepili, E.I.Z., and T.A. Masron. “Finding the Role of FDI in Housing Affordability Level in Malaysia.†Proceeding of ICARBSS. Langkawi, Malaysia, 2017 (29th): 275-81.

Masron, T.A., and Z. Yusop. “Optimum Currency Area Criteria and Volatility in Asean.†Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance 2, no. 2 (2006): 1-17.

Osterwald-Lenum, M. “A Note with Quantiles of the Asymptotic Distribution of the Maximum Likelihood Cointegration Rank Test Statistics1.†Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 54, no. 3 (1992): 461-72.

Pavlov, A., and S. Wachter. “Subprime Lending and Real Estate Prices.†Real Estate Economics 39, no. 1 (2011): 1-17.

Stone, M.E. “What is Housing Affordability? The Case for the Residual Income Approach.†Housing Policy Debate 17, no. 1 (2006): 151-84.

Wacziarg, R. “Measuring The Dynamic Gains from Trade.†The World Bank Economic Review 15, no. 3 (1999): 393-429.

Worthington, A.C. “The Quarter Century Record on Housing Affordability, Affordability Drivers, and Government Policy Responses in Australia.†International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis 5, no. 3 (2011): 235-52.

Yates, J., and V. Milligan. “Housing affordability: a 21st century problem,†AHURI Final Report No. 105, Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute Limited, Melbourne, 2007. https://www.ahuri.edu.au/research/final-reports/105.

Downloads

Published

2020-06-28

How to Cite

Zull Kepili, E. I. (2020). The Indirect Impact of Liberalization on Detached (Luxury) Housing Market in Malaysia. International Journal of Economics, Management and Accounting, 28(1), 63–78. https://doi.org/10.31436/ijema.v28i1.713

Issue

Section

Articles