The Devaluation of the Naira and The State of the Nigerian Economy 1985 - 2015 (An Econometric Analysis)


  • Margaret Abiola Loto University of Lagos, Nigeria


Devaluation, Co-integration, Nigeria, Import demand, Export demand


The paper investigated the impact of devaluation on the Nigerian economy from 1985–2016. Currency devaluation as a macroeconomic policy could have favorable as well as the unfavorable impact on any economy. The Nigerian government has demonstrated frequent implementation of this policy from 1986 till date, evidenced by the naira exchange rate to the dollar of between 450 and 480 naira at the time of this study. Hence, the need for a thorough examination of the impact (whether positive or negative) of currency devaluation on the Nigerian economy. To analyze the influence of devaluation as a policy on the Nigerian economy this study adopts the elasticity approach by using the import and export demand equation. The study used secondary time series data. For the analysis, Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) regression was adopted, with initial stationarity and stability tests. The result of the unit root test showed that the variables were of the same order of iteration being stationary at first difference. This gave room for the co-integration and error-correction tests. The overall result showed that even at this period, devaluation is yet to provide a solution for the Nigerian economy. This was because the sum of the relative prices of import and export coefficients stood at less than 1. This confirms again that devaluation is not the right policy for the Nigerian economy.


Akinlo E.A. “Improving the Performance of the Nigerian Manufacturing Sub-sector after Adjustment.†Nigerian Journal of Economics and Social Studies 38, no. 2 (1996): 91–110.

Al-Abdelrazag. B. “Does Devaluation Improve Jordan’s Trade Balance (1969-94).†Abath Al-varmouk 3, no. 1 (1997): 65–72.

Gafar J. “Devaluation and the Balance of Payments Adjustment in a Developing Economy: An Analysis Relating to Jamaica, 1954-1972.†Journal of Applied Economics 13, no. 2 (1981): 151–65.

Geofrey W. (1981) “Economics Made Simple†(The Chaucer Press) Ltd. Bungay Suffolk (1981): 280–7.

Goldstein M., and M.S. Khan. “The Supply and Demand for Exports: A Simultaneous Approach.†IMF Staff Papers 23 (1978): 275-286.

Loto, M.A. “Does Devaluation Improve the Trade Balance of Nigeria? (A Test of the Marshall-Lerner Condition.†Journal of Economics and International Finance 3, no. 11 (2011): 624-33.

Momodu A.A., and F.N. Akanni. “The Impact of Currency Devaluation on Economic Growth in Nigeria.†International Journal of Arts and Humanities 5, no. 1 (2016): 151–63.

Navaretti K., J.R. Tybout, and L.R. De Melo. “Firm-level Responses to the CFA Devaluation in Cameroon.†Journal of African Economics 6, no. 1 (1997): 3-34.

Okoroafor O.K., and S.O. Adeniji. “Currency Devaluation and Macroeconomic Variables Responses in Nigeria: A Vector Error Correction Model Approach: 1986-2016.†Journal of Finance and Economics 5, no. 6 (2017): 281-9.

Osundina K.C., and J.A. Osundina. “Effectiveness of Naira Devaluation on Economic Growth in Nigeria.†International Journal of Science and Research 5, no. 3 (2016): 1944–8.

Reinhart C.M. “Devaluation, Relative Prices and International Trade: Evidence from Developing Countries.†IMF working paper WP/94/140, (1994).

Uz I. “Bilateral Trade Elasticities of Turkey.†International Journal of Applied Economics. 7, no. 1 (2010): 28–46.

Vasylenko Y., and O. Bazhenova. “A Causal Macroeconomic Model of Devaluation and Inflation Impact on the Economy of Ukraine.†EKONOMIKA 93, no. 1 (2014): 57–73.

Wolf T.A. “The Simultaneity of the Effects of Devaluation Implication for Modified Planned Economy.†Akademia Kado (2014): 303–24.

Zaidan T.M. “Does Devaluation Improve the Trade Balance of Iraq.†OPEC Review 23, no. 2 (1999): 127–38.




How to Cite

Loto, M. A. (2018). The Devaluation of the Naira and The State of the Nigerian Economy 1985 - 2015 (An Econometric Analysis). International Journal of Economics, Management and Accounting, 26(2), 311–327. Retrieved from