SCREENING OF FABRICATION PARAMETERS FOR A LOW-COST MOLECULARLY IMPRINTED POLYMER (MIP)-BASED SENSOR FOR SULFAMETHOXAZOLE DETECTION

Authors

  • Muhammad Azri Rafiq Mohd Rasyidi IIUM
  • Amanatuzzakiah Abdul Halim
  • Rosminazuin Ab. Rahim
  • Aliza 'Aini Md Ralib

Abstract

The presence of sulfamethoxazole (SMX) residues in dairy products poses serious public health concerns, necessitating the development of low-cost and field-deployable screening instruments. While molecularly imprinted polymer (MIP)-based electrochemical sensors have shown promise selectivity for antibiotic detection, little attention has been paid to the screening of fabrication factors that have a significant impact on sensor performance. As a result, this research focuses on the screening of the critical fabrication parameters for a low-cost MIP-modified screen-printed carbon electrode (MIP/SPCE) platform for SMX detection. Cyclic voltammetry was used to assess the impact of carbon ink type (water-based versus solvent-based), stencil type (mesh stencil versus plotter cutter stencil), and MIP deposition volume (5 µL and 10 µL) on the electrochemical performance of the sensor. The MIP was synthesized by bulk polymerization and analyzed with scanning electron microscopy (SEM), which confirmed the successful creation of SMX-specific binding sites. Electrochemical screening findings showed that solvent-based carbon ink and plotter cutter stencils produced SPCEs with lower resistance (200-400 ?) and well-defined redox peaks than their equivalents. Furthermore, a 5 µL MIP deposition volume exhibited optimum electron transport properties, providing a larger anodic peak current than thicker MIP layers. These findings emphasize the importance of fabrication parameter selection in obtaining consistent and sensitive MIP/SPCE performance. The improved manufacturing structure provides a solid platform for the future development of low-cost electrochemical sensors designed for routine antibiotic residue detection in food safety applications.

References

Abdelgalil AA, Alkahtani HM, Al-Jenoobi FI. (2019) Profiles of Drug Substances, Excipients, and Related Methodology. Sorafenib, 44:239-266. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.podrm.2018.11.003

Sachi S, Ferdous J, Sikder M, Hussani S. (2019) Antibiotic residues in milk: Past, present, and future. Journal of Advanced Veterinary and Animal Research, 6(3):315. https://doi.org/10.5455/javar.2019.f350

Sayari A, Alzyadi GA, Almudhihi TF, Aljabr SM. (2025) Determination of Antibiotic Residues in Milk Marketed in SaudiArabia and Their Dietary Risk Assessment. Journal of Food Science and Nutrition Research, 07-13. https://doi.org/10.26502/jfsnr.2642-110000171

Shen Y, Sun Z, Zhao S, Chen F, Shi P, Zhao N, Sun K, Ye C, Lin C, Fu L. (2024) Screen-Printed Electrodes as Low-Cost Sensors for Breast Cancer Biomarker Detection. Sensors, 24(17):5679-5679. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24175679

Simbine-Ribisse EO, Bila NM, Manhiça AJ, Macuamule CJ, Pavesi A. (2024) Antibiotic residues in dairy products in Africa: A systematic review. Food Chemistry Advances, 5:100822-100822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.focha.2024.100822

Virto M, Santamarina-García G, Amores G, Hernández I. (2022) Antibiotics in Dairy Production:Where Is the Problem? Dairy, 3(3):541-564. https://doi.org/10.3390/dairy3030039

Mello GAB, Benjamin SR, de Lima F, Dutra RF. (2025) Recent Advances in Electrochemical Sensors for the Detection of Anti-Inflammatory and Antibiotic Drugs: A Comprehensive Review. Biosensors, 15(10):676. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios15100676 ?

Margaux F, Krupa MP, Hooyberghs, G Lowdon JW, Cleij TJ, Diliën H, Eersels K, Van Grinsven B. (2024) Electrochemical Sensors for Antibiotic Detection: A Focused Review with a Brief Overview of Commercial Technologies. Sensors, 24(17):5576-5576. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24175576 ?

Hatala M, Gemeiner P, Hvojnik M, Mikula M. (2018) The effect of the ink composition on the performance of carbon-based conductive screen printing inks. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics, 30(2):1034-1044. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-018-0372-7 ?

Supatinee K, Tubtimtong S, Thavarungkul P, Kanatharana P, Chang KH, Fahmi A, Limbut W. (2022) A Fabrication of Multichannel Graphite Electrode Using Low-Cost Stencil-Printing Technique. Sensors, 22(8):3034-3034. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22083034 ?

Bravo-Yagüe, JC, Paniagua-González G, Garcinuño RM, García-Mayor A, Fernández-Hernando P. (2025) Colorimetric Molecularly Imprinted Polymer-Based Sensors for Rapid Detection of Organic Compounds: A Review. Chemosensors, 13(5):163-163. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors13050163 ?

Kadhem AJ, Gentile GJ, Fidalgo de Cortalezzi MM. (2021) Molecularly Imprinted Polymers (MIPs) in Sensors for Environmental and Biomedical Applications: A Review. Molecules, 26(20), 6233. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26206233

?Quinto KS, Vega-Chacón J, Mortari B, Wong A, Del M, Picasso G. (2023) Development and Characterization of a Molecularly Imprinted Polymer for the Selective Removal of Brilliant Green Textile Dye from River and Textile Industry Effluents. Polymers, 15(18):3709-3709. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15183709

Thibault C, Séverac C, Mingotaud AF, Vieu C, Mauzac M. (2007) Poly(dimethylsiloxane) Contamination in Microcontact Printing and Its Influence on Patterning Oligonucleotides. Langmuir, 23(21):10706-10714. https://doi.org/10.1021/la701841j

Published

2026-07-31

How to Cite

Mohd Rasyidi, M. A. R., Abdul Halim, A., Ab. Rahim, R., & Md Ralib, A. ’Aini. (2026). SCREENING OF FABRICATION PARAMETERS FOR A LOW-COST MOLECULARLY IMPRINTED POLYMER (MIP)-BASED SENSOR FOR SULFAMETHOXAZOLE DETECTION. IIUM Engineering Congress Proceedings, 1(1), 26–33. Retrieved from https://journals.iium.edu.my/ejournal/index.php/proc/article/view/4443

Conference Proceedings Volume

Section

Chemical Engineering & Sustainability