ADVERSE IMPACT ANALYSIS OF BLOCKCHAIN APPLICATION ON SUSTAINABILITY FOR CHEMICAL INDUSTRY

Authors

Keywords:

Blockchain, Chemical Industry, Proof-of-Work, sustainability.

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Due to security, transparency, traceability, and efficiency, blockchain technology has become more popular in the financial, healthcare, education, and industrial sectors as well. However, before the commercial use of this technology for the chemical industry, the adverse impact of the same should be considered carefully. A study of detailed adverse impact analysis of blockchain applications on the sustainability of the chemical industry has been highlighted in this paper. This research complies with accepted publication standards, in particular, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) recommendations. A variety of primary and supplemental databases are used in our research. Scopus and Science Direct are two well-known databases that we have accessed, along with Emerald Insight, IEE Explore, and Google Scholar as other sources. After comprehensive adverse impact analysis on sustainability from chemical production to blockchain application has been considered such as 1) Environmental: Higher energy use and CO2 emissions linked to the blockchain, 2) Social: The adoption of blockchain technology that may extend the digital divination in society who have less technological privilege, and 3) Economical: Resource-constrained businesses entities may face difficulties due to the costs of developing and integrating blockchain technology in business. This paper will help the stakeholders in the chemical production business to make wise decisions on the adoption of blockchain applications to maximize the benefits by identifying potential risks, developing mitigation strategies, and ensuring that blockchain applications align with sustainable development goals and practices.

References

Zhou, X. ev Kraft, M., (2022). Blockchain Technology in the Chemical Industry, Annual Review of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Rev. Chem. Biomol. Eng. 13, 347–71.

Sankaran, K. (2019). Carbon Emission and Plastic Pollution: How Circular Economy, Blockchain, and Artificial Intelligence Support Energy Transition? The Articles Content is of the Author's exclusive responsibility, 7, 4, ISSN- 2183-0606.

Jian, T., Song, J., ev Yu, Y., (2022). The influencing factors of carbon trading companies applying blockchain technology: evidence from eight carbon trading pilots in China, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29, 28624–28636.

Shanshan, J., Kine, J., Jonas, B., ve Jingyue, L., (2022). A Tertiary Review on Blockchain and Sustainability with Focus on Sustainable, IEEE Access, 10, 11476-115006

Esmaeilian, B., Sarkis, J., Lewis, K., & Behdad, S. (2020). Blockchain for the future of sustainable supply chain management in Industry 4.0. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 163, 105064.

Thalhammer, F., Schöttle, P., Janetschek, M., ev Ploder, C., (2022). Blockchain Use Cases Against Climate Destruction, Cloud Computing and Data Science, Universal Wiser Publisher, 22-38.

Pan, Y., Zhang, X., Wang, Y., Yan, J., Zhou, S., Li, G., ev Bao, J., (2018). Application of Blockchain in Carbon Trading, Preceding of 10th International Conference on Applied Energy (ICAE2018), 22-25 August 2018, Hong Kong, China, 158 (2019) 4286–4291.

Islam, M. R., Rashid, M. M., Rahman, M. A., Mohamad, H. S. B. Embong, ev Abd. H. B., (2022). International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, Vol. 13, No. 4.

Qin, M., Su, C., Lobon?, O., ev Umar, M. (2023). Blockchain: A carbon-neutral facilitator or an environmental destroyer? International Review of Economics & Finance, 86, 604-615.

Erdogan, S., Ahmed, M. Y., ev Sarkodie, S. A., (2021). Analyzing asymmetric effects of cryptocurrency demand on environmental sustainability, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29-31723–31733.

Borowski, P. F., (2021). Digitization, Digital Twins, Blockchain, and Industry 4.0 as Elements of Management Process in Enterprises in the Energy Sector, energies, 14, 1885.

Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, DG., (2009). PRISMA Group, Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement, 151(4), 264-9.

United Nations, Sustainable Development, the 17 goals. Available: https://sdgs.un.org/goals.

Downloads

Published

2023-10-12

How to Cite

Islam, M. R. (2023). ADVERSE IMPACT ANALYSIS OF BLOCKCHAIN APPLICATION ON SUSTAINABILITY FOR CHEMICAL INDUSTRY. IIUM Engineering Congress Proceedings, 1(1), 106–110. Retrieved from https://journals.iium.edu.my/ejournal/index.php/proc/article/view/3004

Issue

Section

Chemical Engineering & Sustainability